Are you Intelligent..?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FurtherSuntime
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

FurtherSuntime

Guest
The Quran…A literal and linguistic miracle…true ?..why or why not. That is the question.

hamzatzortzis.com/?page_id=170

What… Nature of God …finds comfort inside the minds I am chatting with…please answer question in your own words.
 
Internal chuckle. I was accepted by three universities, does that count!
Really though, within the framework of my own mind, how shall I rate my intelligence, except empirically and from others’ responses to me?
My intelligence is uneven, good in some ways, I have areas of insight…but in some ways can be a complete dill. Intellectual intelligence/ emotional intelligence, in both I can be almost brilliant (tongue in cheek) and sometimes a complete idiot.
Sometimes I can rustle up enough intellectual and emotional intelligence to help others,
but you know what,
I only care because it does mean I can sometimes help to enrich others’ lives.
But what matters is that I love, and am loved,
and that my very intelligent sons adore me just as I am…or is it just what and who they think I am. I’m never quite sure about that.
My husband is highly intelligent, and he’s quite fond of me…
and I’m entertaining myself at the expense of failing to supply a serious answer to your question.
Because humor matters a lot too. Whether intelligent or not, I’m glad to be able to laugh internally and externally!
 
Internal chuckle. I was accepted by three universities, does that count!
Really though, within the framework of my own mind, how shall I rate my intelligence, except empirically and from others’ responses to me?
My intelligence is uneven, good in some ways, I have areas of insight…but in some ways can be a complete dill. Intellectual intelligence/ emotional intelligence, in both I can be almost brilliant (tongue in cheek) and sometimes a complete idiot.
Sometimes I can rustle up enough intellectual and emotional intelligence to help others,
but you know what,
I only care because it does mean I can sometimes help to enrich others’ lives.
But what matters is that I love, and am loved,
and that my very intelligent sons adore me just as I am…or is it just what and who they think I am. I’m never quite sure about that.
My husband is highly intelligent, and he’s quite fond of me…
and I’m entertaining myself at the expense of failing to supply a serious answer to your question.
Because humor matters a lot too. Whether intelligent or not, I’m glad to be able to laugh internally and externally!
great , where is answer to question, its straight forward enough…The Quran…A literal and linguistic miracle…true or false ?..why or why not. That is the question. God or …?

hamzatzortzis.com/?page_id=170
 
Yes, I only answered your title, which is where it helps if the title relates directly to the question.
I perhaps shouldn’t have responded at all because my interest is in the truth within Scripture, and though I won’t pursue it further, it is a remarkable literary work of imagery, poetry, and prose
 
The Quran…A literal and linguistic miracle…true ?..why or why not. That is the question.

hamzatzortzis.com/?page_id=170

What… Nature of God …finds comfort inside the minds I am chatting with…please answer question in your own words.
There used to be a book online titled “A Restatement of the History of Islam.” My info comes from it.

The article says this:
Not being able to read or write …
It’s mythology, afaik, because Mohammed was of the only literate tribe in Arabia and he was the manager of his wife’s business. He could certainly read and write.
 
No, but I was a Muslim, and I’ve taken up Muhammad’s challenge:

And if doubt that which We [Allah] have revealed to Our slave [Muhammad],
then produce a surah [chapter] like it, and call on your intercessor, if [you think you can have] one besides Allah, and if you are of truth.

The same challenge issued on that page - and have written surat and ayat that conform to the “Koran 19” code, as well as being as harmonious sounding as the most harmonious parts of the Koran (like surah al Ikhlas): many parts of the Koran are inharmonious (surah al Baqarah), and the Koran Code people remove certain verses because they don’t fit the code. It meets all of the criteria given.

There certainly is nothing even slightly miraculous about the Koran (without even getting in to the contradictions and untruths said within), let alone Islam and the myriad less-than-completely-sane beliefs (Muhammad was absolutely perfect): the most miraculous thing about it is that people still believe in a religion founded on it, or ever did (even though the religion itself comes from the hadith, not the Koran). People think the Bible is boring: the Bible reads like a most excellent thriller or Neal Stephenson novel compared to the Koran; the Bible is for lectio divina, the Koran is for penance. It has no cohesiveness, no story, no point - it’s a series of random injunctions, sometimes pithy, sometimes rambling, and “revelations” to settle Muhammad’s domestic disputes and disputes about war and leadership (coincidentally, always when things were getting out of hand for him, Allah came to the rescue).

An entire surah (109) is dedicated to Allah promising to curse one of Muhammad’s enemies, Abu Lahab, and his wife, to Hell, and a short but graphic depiction of the torture Allah has in store for them. That is not divine.

For example of a “surah like unto one Allah hath revealed”:

We gave Moses before you ten commandments
We give you multiple tens [of commandments]
To show that you are the king of the prophets, with more [than all the previous prophets]
We have made you the last of the prophets, prince of prophets
Seal of the Prophets, King of the Prophets!

We’ve given him our slave so you [Muhammad]
Can abrogate whatever, whenever it please m’lord
Of the orders We have given them.
We give leave to you to change all of our decisions.

Order my slaves who have faith in submission in Islam
To seek refuge in Allah when they yawn
In the Most Merciful to prevent Shaytan from farting at them,
And to greatly glorify Allah with “ALLAHU AKBER!” when they sneeze.
Order them not to allow dogs in their homes
Not to keep pictures in home or wall.
If they want to wear shoes, clothes, or do [a deed]
Order them to do the right before the left
If they do not they surely commit a heinous, grievous, mortal sin.

It even has the tell-tale shifts in noun, case, mood, tense, aspect, and perspective so characteristic of the Koranic text in the original Arabic. The translation is loose, not literal, as literal Arabic makes no sense in English. It also has a quite complex rhyme scheme in Arabic, and scans decently (although a few words are out of place, there’s nowhere in the actual Koran where there are none).

It plays on several words and puns on some of the more ridiculous beliefs of Muslims, i.e. sneezes are Satanic, extreme legalism, angels are scared of dogs and pictures, doing something left before right is a sin, that Satan breaks wind so he doesn’t have to hear the sound of the Koran, and that the Koran is a contradiction through-and-through explained away by “abrogation” of verses when it was convenient to Muhammad’s needs.

In the Arabic, it also conforms to the 19 Koran Code if laid in as surah 115, and further, makes the rest of the Koran (even parts that don’t fit the code in the Koran’s canonical form, i.e. the last several ayat of surah al tawbah) fit it. And writing it took me all of two hours, with no divine assistance (unless the Holy Spirit helped). Bracketed words are not in the Arabic, both for poetic license and for lack of need, but are supplied for clarification in English where the text would otherwise be unreadable.

I’ve written a few more for use in discrediting the “Koran is the miracle of Muhammad” tactic used by Islamic apologists, but only this one and a modification of surah 112 (instead of “Say He is Allah, the One” it becomes “Say, he is Hubal *, a one”) fit the Koran Code.

P.S. The Arabic script won’t display here but if anyone speaks Arabic and wants a transliteration to check my translation, I’d be more than happy.

Alright, maybe I am intelligent. I don’t know 🤷*
 
thanks Julia and good to hear from you… the question of the thread was put to myself this week…I read the link carefully and provided an answer which was, I think very interesting…
I’m curious as to what others think on this and how they would approach the question…
this is meant to be interesting and inspire creative thought as…creative thought is in view.
Is God in view , if so explain, if not why?
 
this is meant to be interesting and inspire creative thought as…creative thought is in view.
Is God in view , if so explain, if not why?
I actually am a bit smarter than a box o’ rocks and I have no idea what this means. Could you restate this as a direct question?

BTW, he was also multilingual. So being outside the scope of the Arabic language also isn’t relevant. He had also read Jewish Scripture and Christian writings.
 
The Koran also contains a decent helping of Syriac in the form of various transliterations and calques. It contains vestiges of Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, at the minimum, and, according to computer analysis, has at least four authors (more likely seven) that contributed sizable portions, over the course of over two hundred years, to the Koran, and possibly a single hand that unified all the sources, but likely two different unifiers.

Source: The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran: A Contribution to the Decoding of the Language of the Koran, Christoph Luxenburg, 2007
 
No, but I was a Muslim, and I’ve taken up Muhammad’s challenge:

And if doubt that which We [Allah] have revealed to Our slave [Muhammad],
then produce a surah [chapter] like it, and call on your intercessor, if [you think you can have] one besides Allah, and if you are of truth.

The same challenge issued on that page - and have written surat and ayat that conform to the “Koran 19” code, as well as being as harmonious sounding as the most harmonious parts of the Koran (like surah al Ikhlas): many parts of the Koran are inharmonious (surah al Baqarah), and the Koran Code people remove certain verses because they don’t fit the code. It meets all of the criteria given.

There certainly is nothing even slightly miraculous about the Koran (without even getting in to the contradictions and untruths said within), let alone Islam and the myriad less-than-completely-sane beliefs (Muhammad was absolutely perfect): the most miraculous thing about it is that people still believe in a religion founded on it, or ever did (even though the religion itself comes from the hadith, not the Koran). People think the Bible is boring: the Bible reads like a most excellent thriller or Neal Stephenson novel compared to the Koran; the Bible is for lectio divina, the Koran is for penance. It has no cohesiveness, no story, no point - it’s a series of random injunctions, sometimes pithy, sometimes rambling, and “revelations” to settle Muhammad’s domestic disputes and disputes about war and leadership (coincidentally, always when things were getting out of hand for him, Allah came to the rescue).

An entire surah (109) is dedicated to Allah promising to curse one of Muhammad’s enemies, Abu Lahab, and his wife, to Hell, and a short but graphic depiction of the torture Allah has in store for them. That is not divine.

For example of a “surah like unto one Allah hath revealed”:

We gave Moses before you ten commandments
We give you multiple tens [of commandments]
To show that you are the king of the prophets, with more [than all the previous prophets]
We have made you the last of the prophets, prince of prophets
Seal of the Prophets, King of the Prophets!

We’ve given him our slave so you [Muhammad]
Can abrogate whatever, whenever it please m’lord
Of the orders We have given them.
We give leave to you to change all of our decisions.

Order my slaves who have faith in submission in Islam
To seek refuge in Allah when they yawn
In the Most Merciful to prevent Shaytan from farting at them,
And to greatly glorify Allah with “ALLAHU AKBER!” when they sneeze.
Order them not to allow dogs in their homes
Not to keep pictures in home or wall.
If they want to wear shoes, clothes, or do [a deed]
Order them to do the right before the left
If they do not they surely commit a heinous, grievous, mortal sin.

It even has the tell-tale shifts in noun, case, mood, tense, aspect, and perspective so characteristic of the Koranic text in the original Arabic. The translation is loose, not literal, as literal Arabic makes no sense in English. It also has a quite complex rhyme scheme in Arabic, and scans decently (although a few words are out of place, there’s nowhere in the actual Koran where there are none).

It plays on several words and puns on some of the more ridiculous beliefs of Muslims, i.e. sneezes are Satanic, extreme legalism, angels are scared of dogs and pictures, doing something left before right is a sin, that Satan breaks wind so he doesn’t have to hear the sound of the Koran, and that the Koran is a contradiction through-and-through explained away by “abrogation” of verses when it was convenient to Muhammad’s needs.

In the Arabic, it also conforms to the 19 Koran Code if laid in as surah 115, and further, makes the rest of the Koran (even parts that don’t fit the code in the Koran’s canonical form, i.e. the last several ayat of surah al tawbah) fit it. And writing it took me all of two hours, with no divine assistance (unless the Holy Spirit helped). Bracketed words are not in the Arabic, both for poetic license and for lack of need, but are supplied for clarification in English where the text would otherwise be unreadable.

I’ve written a few more for use in discrediting the “Koran is the miracle of Muhammad” tactic used by Islamic apologists, but only this one and a modification of surah 112 (instead of “Say He is Allah, the One” it becomes “Say, he is Hubal *, a one”) fit the Koran Code.

P.S. The Arabic script won’t display here but if anyone speaks Arabic and wants a transliteration to check my translation, I’d be more than happy.

Alright, maybe I am intelligent. I don’t know 🤷*

The day is late, toms another day…( thread title designed for those interested in creative approach…there are many implications in the over all summation-opinion, Will read above tom…I’m certainly not an expert but…I don’t think the general public is either, which may provide for a worthwhile thread
 
… my dear friends ,

… my view : intelligence is an ability of the mind , you cannot measure it with knowledge at all , although at least some knowledge is needed to know if your intelligent , but what is most important is ones ability to understand and appreciate what knowledge one has , if this is perfect humanly speaking then ones ability to solve problems is as perfect as can humanly be , to solve a problem you musty solve it correctly , perfectly and permanently , i see none that can do this bar the holy family , this is why we have an unprecedented explosion of problems ever expanding in the world today and things just go from worse to worse , too many new problems keep coming and none evere get solved , things are out of control now , this is also why history keeps repeating itself as the same problems keep popping up too – the old problems never get solved either , it is the loss of the preternatural gifts that has made mans nind the opposite of reality and thus no longer able to solve a single problem , a sorry state of affairs , i know it appears probs are solved but the reality is none ever are i’m afraid , intelligence is measured by mans ability to solve problems , that’s how i see it …

… may god bless and love you all 👍🙂 ,

… john …
 
The Quran…A literal and linguistic miracle…true ?..why or why not. That is the question.

hamzatzortzis.com/?page_id=170

What… Nature of God …finds comfort inside the minds I am chatting with…please answer question in your own words.
I heard Hamza go through this same spill before. I know this can be said to some extent of conversations in this thread, but his word semantics are radically different from those that you may use in every day spoken language. This often leads to your arguments being taken in a manner that doesn’t align with the thoughts you are trying to express. It also makes his words come across as meaning something entirely different than you might intuit and you’d be considerably deep into a discussion before you find out “no, that’s not what I meant by that word! You are arguing against a strawman argument, not my argument.”

BTW: He’s incredibly skilled at giving you the answer to the questions you are not asking.
 
No, but I was a Muslim, and I’ve taken up Muhammad’s challenge:

And if doubt that which We [Allah] have revealed to Our slave [Muhammad],
then produce a surah [chapter] like it, and call on your intercessor, if [you think you can have] one besides Allah, and if you are of truth.

The same challenge issued on that page - and have written surat and ayat that conform to the “Koran 19” code, as well as being as harmonious sounding as the most harmonious parts of the Koran (like surah al Ikhlas): many parts of the Koran are inharmonious (surah al Baqarah), and the Koran Code people remove certain verses because they don’t fit the code. It meets all of the criteria given.

There certainly is nothing even slightly miraculous about the Koran (without even getting in to the contradictions and untruths said within), let alone Islam and the myriad less-than-completely-sane beliefs (Muhammad was absolutely perfect): the most miraculous thing about it is that people still believe in a religion founded on it, or ever did (even though the religion itself comes from the hadith, not the Koran). People think the Bible is boring: the Bible reads like a most excellent thriller or Neal Stephenson novel compared to the Koran; the Bible is for lectio divina, the Koran is for penance. It has no cohesiveness, no story, no point - it’s a series of random injunctions, sometimes pithy, sometimes rambling, and “revelations” to settle Muhammad’s domestic disputes and disputes about war and leadership (coincidentally, always when things were getting out of hand for him, Allah came to the rescue).

An entire surah (109) is dedicated to Allah promising to curse one of Muhammad’s enemies, Abu Lahab, and his wife, to Hell, and a short but graphic depiction of the torture Allah has in store for them. That is not divine.

For example of a “surah like unto one Allah hath revealed”:

We gave Moses before you ten commandments
We give you multiple tens [of commandments]
To show that you are the king of the prophets, with more [than all the previous prophets]
We have made you the last of the prophets, prince of prophets
Seal of the Prophets, King of the Prophets!

We’ve given him our slave so you [Muhammad]
Can abrogate whatever, whenever it please m’lord
Of the orders We have given them.
We give leave to you to change all of our decisions.

Order my slaves who have faith in submission in Islam
To seek refuge in Allah when they yawn
In the Most Merciful to prevent Shaytan from farting at them,
And to greatly glorify Allah with “ALLAHU AKBER!” when they sneeze.
Order them not to allow dogs in their homes
Not to keep pictures in home or wall.
If they want to wear shoes, clothes, or do [a deed]
Order them to do the right before the left
If they do not they surely commit a heinous, grievous, mortal sin.

It even has the tell-tale shifts in noun, case, mood, tense, aspect, and perspective so characteristic of the Koranic text in the original Arabic. The translation is loose, not literal, as literal Arabic makes no sense in English. It also has a quite complex rhyme scheme in Arabic, and scans decently (although a few words are out of place, there’s nowhere in the actual Koran where there are none).

It plays on several words and puns on some of the more ridiculous beliefs of Muslims, i.e. sneezes are Satanic, extreme legalism, angels are scared of dogs and pictures, doing something left before right is a sin, that Satan breaks wind so he doesn’t have to hear the sound of the Koran, and that the Koran is a contradiction through-and-through explained away by “abrogation” of verses when it was convenient to Muhammad’s needs.

In the Arabic, it also conforms to the 19 Koran Code if laid in as surah 115, and further, makes the rest of the Koran (even parts that don’t fit the code in the Koran’s canonical form, i.e. the last several ayat of surah al tawbah) fit it. And writing it took me all of two hours, with no divine assistance (unless the Holy Spirit helped). Bracketed words are not in the Arabic, both for poetic license and for lack of need, but are supplied for clarification in English where the text would otherwise be unreadable.

I’ve written a few more for use in discrediting the “Koran is the miracle of Muhammad” tactic used by Islamic apologists, but only this one and a modification of surah 112 (instead of “Say He is Allah, the One” it becomes “Say, he is Hubal *, a one”) fit the Koran Code.

P.S. The Arabic script won’t display here but if anyone speaks Arabic and wants a transliteration to check my translation, I’d be more than happy.

Alright, maybe I am intelligent. I don’t know 🤷*

Well I guess the phrase “informed and capable” should have been used rather than intelligence
to avoid the imaturity.thats seen in the un-informed and in-capable.

Thank you for above and it is what I was hoping to un-cover for the obvious in an ever increasing multi-cultural world. Hopefully viewers can learn something from above and the very
few other… mature posts.

My approach to the question was from a critical perspective of natural talent through art- creativity… in order to deconstruct the general “theme and presentation” in the Koran using this skill . I do not speak the languages,am not a historian and cannot even begin to correctly challenge the so called un-explained phenomenon put forward in the OP link. I don’t think many people could draft a proper complaint to the link…well done and appreciated.

If the belief is in absolute error which I believe, everyone should know exactly why… I find your
analogy incredibly thorough. and should be understood by anyone interested in understanding
the environment and the many Muslims who are now pushing this faith on the world with great vigor, no doubt about it.
 
The following post lacks any systematic thought or analysis, but contains a few thoughts on the matter of Koranic composition and early Islamic history. I can expand on any given thought if anyone here so desires.

Muhammad likely was virtually illiterate, but likely multilingual in a basic sense, that he could speak various creoles and pidgins of the traders: if he was literate, he wouldn’t have made the mistakes that he did (confusing Miriam sister of Moses with Mary mother of Jesus, as “Maryam” is the word for each in Arabic, or confounding the Trinity of God-Word-Spirit with God-Word-Mary, although he may have come into contact with the Collyridians, who were true Mariolaters, and he most definitely had contact with Ebionites - his wife Khadijah was - and likely had contact with Nestorians, as Khadijah’s cousin likely was) - so he had a whole stream of heresy, orthodoxy, and apocryphal traditions to draw on, as evidenced by the nativity story in the Koran (Gospel of James), the breathing of clay birds to life, the inclusion of Alexander the Great in the form of an abridged Alexander romance in the Koran as a prophet (Dhu-al-Qarnayn), etc.

It’s likely that he heard a great deal of oral tradition, being a far-travelled merchant from Damascus to Jerusalem and everywhere in between, and had an excellent memory, as is very common in oral cultures that depend on the speech of memory instead of its writing. Pre-Islamic Arabia was most definitely a culture soaked in orality; poetry was esteemed as the highest art-form, and many people could memorize extremely complex and quite long rhetorical constructs, and could engage in something like “rapping” today, making up new verses on the fly. Poetry, having a rhyme-scheme, like music, is much easier to memorize than prose: here, I see a connection between the poetic nature of vast tracts of the Koran and the need to have it memorized by his followers, and the lack of a written culture: it was a religious poem, adapting the highest art-form of the Bedouins to his own purposes.

I highly doubt that Muhammad wrote or recited all of the Koran, but that he was one of several authors, and possibly the earlier unifier in the multiple-recension theory, but it seems unlikely that he was a unifier, as the earliest evidence of even part of the Koran (half of surah 7 to the beginning of surah 42, mostly intact: remember, that the first five surat of the Koran contain almost 25% of the entire Koran, and the last 50 surat contain only 10%, out of 114 total) comes from about 150-200 years after Muhammad’s death (the Sana’a manuscripts), and earlier attestations, such as the inscription on the Dome of the Rock (50-70 years after Muhammad’s death), combine several different verses into one, all in altered form: so, while alluding to a Proto-Koranic tradition, it is far from the Koran, as the mixing of different ayat would have been highly irregular and improper; it is likely this is from an Oral Proto-Koran, or an earlier and lost recension (unlikely).

At the time, Mecca was a large trading center/super-caravanserai as well, with people of all types and creeds present - it was also used at times as a refuge for heretics escaping Byzantium.

It’s also possible (I believe likely) that Muhammad was at first presenting himself as a Jewish messianic figure (a view more fully elucidated in Hagarism: the Making of the Islamic World by Patricia Crone and Michael Cook, and The Sectarian Milieu: the Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History by John Wansbrough) who then broke with Judaism when it became obvious the Jews would not accept him as anything more than a false prophet, and attempted to establish a coincidental line of Ishmaelite prophets, to parallel the Israelite prophets, to legitimize his own claims to prophethood, and to create a Judaeo-Christian-independent history and soteriology (this is the co-opting of all Judaeo-Christian tradition as Islamic, claiming that all of the Prophets of all times were Muslims and preached Islam) at the same time drawing in elements of pagan Meccan culture (the Hajj, veneration of the Kaaba), or was invented by Uthman for the aforementioned reasons, as Uthman himself is recorded as having the name “the Redeemer”, which adds evidence to the circumstantial case for Jewish messianism in proto-Islam. Other evidence includes the earlier Jerusalem Kaaba (the same direction the Jews prayed) and his early diplomacy with the Jews in Yathrib (Medina).
 
There are in the Koran, discernible even to the untrained eye in translation, a minimum of two phases, and likely two authors, traditionally divided by Muslims in to the Meccan (early) and Medinan (late) phases (the Medinan surat always abrogate the Meccan surat, leading to the violence taking precedence over the peace, as the last surat, chronologically, are believed to be 5 or 9, the two most imperialist and violent, in the traditional Muslim account). The Meccan phase is characterized by short revelations, generally sincere in character, that are peaceful in nature and are extremely poetic, and lack extensive law and regulation. The Medinan phases are characterized by much longer revelations that are much more violent/imperialist in character and lack the poetry of the Meccan verses, and are obsessed and laden with legal regulations; this may be explained by his coming into contact with Jewish law, and copying it for himself, in a further attempt to win the Jews over, the nature of his new political power (or both of the above), or may be explained by being of two different schools and two different authors (both are well supported theories). One theory also has to do with the death of his first wife and first believer (with who he remained monogamous for many years, in contrast to his notorious later bigamy) as dealing him a severe psychological blow, which happened shortly after he emigrated to Medina: this theory is incidental to, and can bolster, any of the above in this paragraph.

P.S. Muhammad’s title “seal of the prophets”, in Arabic, like English, can be interpreted in two different ways: it is likely that earlier the first, and later the second, were meant. The first, and most obvious interpretation, is that he took the title “Seal of the Prophets” as one puts a seal on a document: imagine a long list of Prophetic utterances; he, like the seal, was viewed as a vouch-safe for them, in a time when the proto-Muslims still revered and used the Jewish and Christian Scriptures and apocryphal traditions as their own (as we Christians use the Alexandrian Jewish Scriptures, with the exception of 3-4 Maccabees and the Psalms of Solomon, as our own, and believe that they do prophesy and testify to the coming of our Lord and the incidents of his life). The second became like unto a seal on a jar, whereupon “Seal of the Prophets” meant “the last of the Prophets”, after the Koran began to be, or was, codified, supplanted the earlier Judaeo-Christian and apocryphal Scriptures, and the doctrine of tahrif, or purposeful corruption of the Judaeo-Christian Scriptures by the Jews and Christians was devised.
 
The two phase’s do seem detached from each other in theme and from what I understand the Surat portion is discretionary or at least suggested to be followed by extremists … The first query which comes to mind with respects to the wealth of knowledge provided, is the power the Jews must of enjoyed in order to influence to this degree. I can only wonder if it had to do with an advantage in general trade at this particular time…

It almost seems there may have been unrest socially within the society and possibly with the Jews which created a demand for order and consequently the seal as well the Surat phase…Wondering if history tells us of any government influence at these times
 
The Jews had complete, unchallenged dominance of Yathrib (and several other Hejaz oases) according to all history, both traditional Islamic and secular, before Muhammad ascended to power there and renamed it “Medina al Nabi”, or “City of the Prophet”.
 
Early on there were two branches of Islamic thought. The Mu’tazalites said that reason leads us to an understanding of the nature of God. They thought that if the Koran didn’t correspond to reason, it shouldn’t be taken literally. The Mu’tazalites thought that God, Himself, was reason and that reason was his gift to human beings. Reason could discover what is right and wrong and come to an understanding of moral imperatives. One of their great theologians, Abd al Jabbar, stated, “It is obligatory for you to carry out what accords with reason.” Interestingly, their ideas matched Christian apologetics unlike the Ash’urites’ way of thinking. They were followers of al-Ash’ari and thought that God is not reason but pure will and power.

It’s hard to win over Muslims since they view Mohammed’s interpretation of Scripture as rectifying the views of the Jews (the Torah) and the Christians (the Bible). IOW, to Muslims, Mohammed is the final prophet. They can’t see returning to an adulterated interpretation such as they view the Torah and the Bible. It would be like Christians converting to Judaism when we see Christianity as a fulfillment of the Jewish revelation. Mohammed said that God gave His word to the Jews and the Jews didn’t understand it. He then gave His word to the Christians, but the Christians came up with a story that God, who is all-powerful in Himself, had a Son.

(See article on Robert Reilly. He’s an authority on Islam.)

catholic.org/ae/books/review.php?id=37873
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top