Are You Ready for a U.S. President ('08) with Muslim Roots? Who Supports Infanticide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PLAL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PLAL

Guest
Are You Ready for a U.S. President with Muslim Roots in '08? Who Supports Infanticide?

He is eloquent, well spoken, with a membrane-thin veiled socialist agenda cloaked in flowery speech. But unlike Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn. – who had to be reminded by Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., that while congressional blacks were no longer relegated to ticket taker in a cloakroom, they had better not forget their place – Barack Obama, D-Ill., is just the kind of black man elite liberals can use.

But also unlike Ford, Barack Obama is much more appealing to blacks nationwide and thus much more formidable when you combine that with his ability to raise large contributions, his Muslim roots and education, his ability to rivet national audiences with his snake-charmer oratory skills and an appealing mien that connects well with liberal voters. Accordingly, Lord Obama could very easily morph into “Darth Democrat.”

It should be no surprise that he is from Illinois. Illinois has a long history (from Capone to Daley) of empowering the unsavory. This unsavory comes with a smooth veneer that reverberates a thirst for power.

MUST READ ON…

worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41479
RELATED…

Why Jesus Would Not Vote For Barack Obama by Jill Stanek

wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51121
 
And who cares if he has “Muslim Roots”?

“no religious test shall ever be required, as a qualification to any office or public trust, under the United States.”

Oh that’s right. The 1st Amendment only applies to Christians, and Muslims aren’t part of this “Christian Nation”, so anyone even remotely associated with Islam can’t hold office.
 
BioCatholic said:
“no religious test shall ever be required, as a qualification to any office or public trust, under the United States.”
Click to expand...
What about the myriad of judges which the Democrats tried to use a “religious test” to disqualify them. I guess “religious tests” are not allowed only if you are a Democrat.:rolleyes:
 
This is why I’m one of the proud 30% who voted for Keyes. Both our senators are a disgrace.
 
Dale_M said:
Well, its par for the course with World Nuts Daily.
Click to expand...
I don’t understand what you’re saying? It’s par for them to report on the absurd voting record of Obama from when he was in the Illinois General Assembly?
 
gmarie21 said:
I don’t understand what you’re saying? It’s par for them to report on the absurd voting record of Obama from when he was in the Illinois General Assembly?
Click to expand...
But the article didn’t discuss his record (other than abortion) - it simply slapped derogatory labels on him and set up straw man arguments. Okay, at the tail end of the article, the author says:
His positions on crime, sex education for grades K-5, homosexual marriage and taxes are out of the mainstream of the so-called liberal mainstream.
Click to expand...
But what on earth does that mean? What are his positions on these issues? They are never discussed.
 
Dale_M said:
But the article didn’t discuss his record (other than abortion) - it simply slapped derogatory labels on him and set up straw man arguments. Okay, at the tail end of the article, the author says: But what on earth does that mean? What are his positions on these issues? They are never discussed.
Click to expand...
This doesn’t scare you?
Another trademark of uber-liberal socialists like Lord Obama is complete disregard for human life – especially the lives of the elderly, physically challenged and the unborn. Or in Obama’s case, even the “Live-born abortion victims.” He claimed his reason for not supporting SB1093, the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act,” was the measure didn’t include the “life and health of the mother” provision…
Click to expand...
 
I would just like to say that, as a citizen of Illinois, I am ashamed that Obama and Durbin represent this state. I did not vote for them and never will, for anything.

Scout :tiphat:
 
Gmarie21, his support for abortion is enough for me not to support him.
 
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I feel that WND is a good source of information and that the article was fair.

It is a fact that Obama favors infanticide. Just look at his record. Many pro abortion democrats voted for the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act”. This act is not the same as the partial birth abortion ban act. It protects babies who are born during abortions from being killed. Obama did not think this was a good idea however.
He claimed his reason for not supporting SB1093, the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act,” was the measure didn’t include the “life and health of the mother” provision
Click to expand...
 
estesbob said:
There are very few who are as eloquent in the defense of life as Alan Keyes.
Click to expand...
If he’s eloquent he sure didn’t show it during the 2004 election. He came accross as an abrasive, arrogant, moralizer. I was quite happy to see the back of him when he and his boxspring (about the only furniture he took there) slunk on out of his spot in Calumet City.
 
a_cermak said:
If he’s eloquent he sure didn’t show it during the 2004 election. He came accross as an abrasive, arrogant, moralizer. .
Click to expand...
Unfortunately the people of IL would think the same about Christ if he was running in place of Keyes. Face it, IL only supports the Culture of Death Political Candidates and I believe God sent Dr. Alan Keyes here to send a message to the people of IL to clean up their act!
 
matt1985 said:
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I feel that WND is a good source of information
Click to expand...
Okay, but WND is also an extreme right-wing fanatically “Christian” Zionist, mildly anti-Catholic, conspiracy-minded (cabals run the world), basically anti-Conservative (Farah dislikes Conservatives because they always want to work within the law) opinion site. But, each to his own taste.
 
Haven’t they been running a series of articles condemning those modern practices of Christian mysticism like contemplative prayer?

I get their newletter just so I can laugh at it and file it under religious crazies.
 
worldnetdaily.com/news/ar…TICLE_ID=41479

in Obama’s case, even the “Live-born abortion victims.” He claimed his reason for not supporting SB1093, the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act,” was the measure didn’t include the “life and health of the mother” provision.
A question that begs an answer is where, exactly, does the threat to the mother lie in said infant protection? Interestingly enough, Obama refused to support two bans which did include exceptions for safety of the mother. So his refusal to support anti
partial-birth abortion bills HB382 and SB230 comes as no surprise.
Click to expand...
He also refused to support SB1095, which creates a cause of action for harm or neglect that comes to a child “born-alive” after a labor-induced abortion. Add to that his “no” vote on SB1661, also part of the “Abortion Alive Protection Act,” which created the “Induced Birth Infant Liability Act.”
His positions on crime, sex education for grades K-5, homosexual marriage and taxes are out of the mainstream of the so-called liberal mainstream. Obama embraces the darkest interests of the uber-liberal socialist. It can be argued there are worse things than a Clinton ticket in 2008 – and any ticket with Barack Obama on it is one of them.
Click to expand...
Racial, religious, and family disrespect aside. The information included about the lack of respect for life is enough to make me work hard to make sure he is not elected in 2008. If I lived where I could vote him out of office now I would do so.
 
What this article points to is what I have been saying for months. Barack is the nominee if he chooses to run. Insiders on the Republican Party are very concerned about facing him in '08. They would much prefer Hillary. The typical right wing playbook would have to be modified slightly against Barack. The Republicans fear him for this reason. I believe Barack will be very difficult to defeat. He is very polished and will appeal to those in the middle.
BTW, the Republicans may not even have Pro-life nominee. Rudy G.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top