R
redrosetea
Guest
I don’t know how you can be? Either you think Jesus is the Son of God, born of a Virgin or you don’t…I don’t think Mathew ,Mark ,Luke, and John were liars…
I don’t, either.I don’t know how you can be? Either you think Jesus is the Son of God, born of a Virgin or you don’t…I don’t think Mathew ,Mark ,Luke, and John were liars…![]()
Oh, I see.I read that Rowan Williams has said the nativity story was a myth.
I am guessing he would say that it is a “myth” in the sense of being a story that people commonly tell to explain how Jesus came to be on the earth. (Which happens in this case to be a true story.)it seems a strange position for a clergyman to take
In what sense ‘mock her’? Please give your sources. Otherwise that’s a scandalous thing to say, and a gross misrepresentaion of mainstream Protestantism, and especially Anglicanism/the Episcopalian church.No wonder they hold Mary in such low esteem, and mock her…I am so glad I am a Catholic
?
Not at all. Many clergy both Catholic and protestant buy into a modernistic liberal view of the Gospels where everything miraculous is explained away. Where Christianity is reduced to the historical accuracy of the man Jesus, the existence of God, the dignity of man and his soul and ethical behavior. Where salvation is seen as the upraising of society in order to hasten the kingdom of God on earth and where Christs death wasn’t salvific at all, but mere martyrdom.I read that Rowan Williams has said the nativity story was a myth…it seems a strange position for a clergyman to take
Yes, there are people who don’t believe Jesus was literally born of a virgin or that he literally fed a multitude on the pittance that his disciples had managed to round up for the project. There are also people on the not-so-liberal side who don’t believe that Jesus literally meant that it is harder for a rich man to enter heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle or that he didn’t really mean it when he referred to as evildoers whom he would order out of his sight the people who would ignore the imprisoned, the hungry, thirsty, naked, and the other “least of these”, that he didn’t mean that business about turning the other cheek, and so on. (Have you noticed that Jesus’ account of the Last Judgement is noticeably short on judgement based on adherence to doctrinal truths?)Not at all. Many clergy both Catholic and protestant buy into a modernistic liberal view of the Gospels where everything miraculous is explained away. Where Christianity is reduced to the historical accuracy of the man Jesus, the existence of God, the dignity of man and his soul and ethical behavior. Where salvation is seen as the upraising of society in order to hasten the kingdom of God on earth and where Christs death wasn’t salvific at all, but mere martyrdom.
Liberal Christianity. It is murky, it is dirty it is impure and it is frightening.
A system of ethics.If you take the miracles out of the gospels what is left?![]()
No.Atheists can be ethical can’t they? Will that get them to heaven if they deny Christ?
Sorry - I meant that they can’t go to Heaven if they deny Christ.No to which? Atheists can’t be ethical, or they can’t get to heaven if they deny Christ?