B
buffalo
Guest
Bogus alert!Also you must understand that if you deny evolution then you in effect deny all science, however given the above i doubt you will accept that either.
Bogus alert!Also you must understand that if you deny evolution then you in effect deny all science, however given the above i doubt you will accept that either.
To whom do you refer?You should try to explain that to some the FOUNDERS OF SCIENCE who accepted biblical creation, the list is many and their belief did not hinder their science. A denial of the philosophy of evolutionary speculation, extrapolation and storytelling is not a denial of science.
There is nothing bogus about it, i just so happen to understand how scientific research works.Bogus alert!
Even wiki will tell you. Newton and Robert Grosseteste (inventor of the scientific method)are good examples.You should try to explain that to some the FOUNDERS OF SCIENCE who accepted biblical creation, the list is many and their belief did not hinder their science. A denial of the philosophy of evolutionary speculation, extrapolation and storytelling is not a denial of science.
Are you addressing me? How exactly could Newtron and Gosseteste accept Darwinin evolution?Even wiki will tell you. Newton and Robert Grosseteste (inventor of the scientific method)are good examples.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thinkers_in_science
"Originally Posted by jackfrost10Are you addressing me? How exactly could Newtron and Gosseteste accept Darwinin evolution?
Notice i did NOT say that one could not be a creationist, i said one would not deny evolution. Pretty hard to deny a theory that was not in existance.![]()
And overwhelming holes in the theory.If you have found nothing substantive enough then you clearly have not looked for, or not understood the evidence. For there is overwhelming evidence in support of evolution.
It’s a massive problem. Irreducible complexity. A step-by-step, gradual increase in information and functionality with intermediate forms serving some kind of function?And complexity is still a big problem…
Right, evolution must have stopped in this day and age because I don’t see nothing changing into a new species. Billions and Billions (so they sayAnd overwhelming holes in the theory.
I am still waiting on those transitional species you promised.
I read through the materials, underwhelming is one word.
And complexity is still a big problem, one you have failed to address.
You can stick with your appeal to ignorance if you wish, but that places you in the company of mystics and cultists rather then real scientsts.
Here is a very interesting talk about transitionals. Including tiktaallik ( around 25:00 and look at predictions at 47:00)And overwhelming holes in the theory.
I am still waiting on those transitional species you promised.
I read through the materials, underwhelming is one word.
And complexity is still a big problem, one you have failed to address.
You can stick with your appeal to ignorance if you wish, but that places you in the company of mystics and cultists rather then real scientsts.
Famous Medical Breakthroughs - The Christian Pioneers"Originally Posted by jackfrost10
Also you must understand that if you **deny evolution **then you in effect deny all science, however given the above i doubt you will accept that either."
Well you would not want to deny yourself being subjected to an MRI scan when your doctor says you need one, since it was Raymond Damadian an “evolution denier” who invented it. It has provided huge benefits to the Medical profession, he was awarded 2001 Lemelson-MIT Lifetime Achievement Award Winner, he is is an inductee of the National Inventors Hall of Fame, a recipient of the National Medal of Technology.
Excellent link…there is a lot of great videos there, I particularly enjoyed No.56 “Tracing your Ancestors through History”…just keep em coming.
it seems that your go to when the discussion turns against you is to post another link
LOL…it seems that your go to when the discussion turns against you is to post another link
I prefer the reasonable to the mysticism any day.it seems that your go to when the discussion turns against you is to post another link
And I prefer actual discussion to “ya, but let’s talk about this instead cause this isn’t working out so well for me!”I prefer the reasonable to the mysticism any day.
Hi tjm,Evolution is over a century old, and despite the nit picks by self described scientists, the evidence gathered in that time by and large supports evolution,