Arrogance & Intolerance of Nontraditionalists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exporter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
From: Patrick Johnson <patjohnson_au@yahoo.com.au
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002

Dear Sir,

I just have to reply to some of the articles you have written in recent times with regard to the Society of Saint Pius X. I must say “Sir” that you are an idiot who has deprived some poor village somewhere in the world of a village idiot. Amazing isn’t it that a man ejeculates millions of sperm in a sexual act yet somehow you snuck in there, and here we are with the greatest moron of all times. You “sir” obviously have more time on your hands than sense, and in attempting to profile someone of your ilk, I would guess that you are narcissistic, self opinionated, fat, inert, inept, incompetent, impotent, uneducated and I bet the Australian Tax Payer supports you. One Hundred and thirty six pages…hmmmm No wonder Ratzinger had his minion Perl reply.

I might be a convert to the Catholic Church, and one does not need to be a Rhodes Scholar to notice what is actually going on. You shite head are no Henry VIII, no.you can never be known as Defender of the Faith…Dickhead of the Faith more likely.

I am just glad that there are probably not many like you in this world…afterall we know God is Merciful and the chances of your clone or others like you are mercifully few and far between. It is people such as you who reinforce the Therory of Evolution, and support the argument for abortion.

Yours in contempt
From: Thomas Sparks tommythelesser@lycos.com
Date: Tue. 13 Aug 2002

Louton, you must be a queer to bitch so much. Admit it, you are a sad old queer with nothing better to do.
From: David Ycavall@aol.com
Date: Sat. 9 Aug. 2003

“(“F” word deleted) *******!!!”
Hmmmmmmmmm?
 
Exporter said:
****************************************************************************
White Dove, Please, I do not understand “shrill”. Shrill sounds like a term ladies use. I am a man, and a retired H.S. football coach. I don’t use that word. Can you substitute another word? Yes? Do it.

Cute is another French word I am not in the habit of using. There are three ,eamings for “cute”. Your context didn’t help me. Usually plain language is best for comunication.
Click to expand...

You are cute, Exporter.

Shrill is when you do a little rant and it looks like your blood pressure might have also gone up at the same time. 🙂 You know, Dr Laura is pretty shrill. She gets on a rant, her voice gets louder and higher, and the vein on her neck sticks out! 😉
 
40.png
dumspirospero:
LOL…good thread Exporter.
Click to expand...
Originally Posted by Exporter
*There is a thread that asks about the Arrogance & Intolerance of “Traditional Catholics”.

I believe that the traditional Catholic is no more arrogant nor intolerant than any other Catholic group.

I ask, IF the Nontraditional Catholic, the Modernists, the Liberals, the ones who want to change the Mass and the ones who want to change the role of women in the Church ARE NOT EVEN MORE INTOLERANT while walking an ARROGANT walk, don’t you agree.

There are at least two threads on this Forum on which a traditional or conservative statement is met with intolerance and harsh words.

This poster says the nontraditionalists are arrogant and lack tolerance. Any comments?*
WHITE DOVE, this is saying that both ends of the spectrum are equally arrogant. I see nothing “cute” here. But maybe you are just trying to make friends with me, is that correct?
 
No I dont think Exporter is a vuclan-try visiting the string that is bashing the Traditionalists and SSPX-this string is TAME by comparison-the outright nastiness of the so called “liberal left” who are supposed to be the Love wing of the church is disgusting.

It came to light this past election with liberal groups like Move on.org and the nastiness and hatred of the Michael Moores and the Howard Dean Scream of the world. The left is very very shifty-they are the wolf in sheeps clothing that our Lord warned as about as they play it very coy- and pretend they are all “in communion” with the Pope-but they have their own schismatic agenda and it is worse as it is right in the church.

I was reading a traditionalist writer the other day comparing the present state of the church as compared to all of the past heresy’s, and he hit the nail on the head as he said in the past we always knew who were our enemies-but now the enemies are right there within the church-the Modernist, liberals, the Hans Kung theologians and they have infiltrated the Priesthood and Bishops and Cardinals-and it may take centuries to root them out. And is that not the truth
40.png
WhiteDove:
Dear Exporter,

Are you a vulcan, perhaps??? 😃
http://www.vegontv.com/vegontv/images/spock_giving_vulcan_salute_286x215.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Deacon Ed:
The other problem with the claim above is that it denies to Rome the right (divinely given!) to regulate the liturgy and the Church itself. Now that is, IMNSHO, arrogant!

Deacon Ed
Click to expand...
**## Except that this is itself a very recent claim - prior to 1570, the Popes did not legislate for a whole Rite on how the Mass was to be celebrated. The claim made by Pius XII to regulate the Liturgy, is quite unhistorical. **
**Rome’s “right” to legislate for the entire Church, is modern, not traditional. A right is not well-founded merely by being claimed, even if the Pope is the claimant. That would be a theological absurdity. Patriarchs are no more Papal vicars in this or other matters than any bishops: and the liturgy is the care of the bishop, not of the Pope. To claim the contrary, is nothing but usurpation by the Pope, for which he should be rebuked, as Peter was rebuked by Paul. **
Ultramontanism - which is what is usually meant by being “traditional” - is an RC equivalent of 19th-century “empire building”. But it is a far cry from representing the whole tradition of the CC. It’s a two hundred year segment of that tradition, no more. ##
 
40.png
WhiteDove:
Dear Exporter,

Are you a vulcan, perhaps??? 😃
http://www.vegontv.com/vegontv/images/spock_giving_vulcan_salute_286x215.jpg
Click to expand...
I have been called a “computer mind”, a “mean old man” and “Archie Bunker”. Personally I like Archie Bunker the best. The guy who called me that is a Nuclear Engineer for General Electric, I guess he knows.

Hey White Dove, are you one of those little ladies who peek out from behind the window curtins when you hear a noise?
 
40.png
Exporter:
Hey White Dove, are you one of those little ladies who peek out from behind the window curtins when you hear a noise?
Click to expand...
I think she is flirting with you. Be nice or she’ll start a poll about you.
 
Dear Newton,
Not a bad idea… Maybe I SHOULD do a poll on Exporter. He’s kind of cute, sort of a quinsessential sports guy, a meat and potatoes fellow through and through. He is very basic, down to earth, straight forward, cut to the chase. He doesn’t eat quiche and strongly identifies with Tim Allen of “Tool Time”. 😃
 
40.png
WhiteDove:
Dear Newton,
Not a bad idea… Maybe I SHOULD do a poll on Exporter. He’s kind of cute, sort of a quinsessential sports guy, a meat and potatoes fellow through and through. He is very basic, down to earth, straight forward, cut to the chase. He doesn’t eat quiche and strongly identifies with Tim Allen of “Tool Time”. 😃
Click to expand...
:rotfl: I am waiting on pins and needles:rotfl: 😃 God Bless
 
Originally Posted by WhiteDove
Dear Newton,
Not a bad idea… Maybe I SHOULD do a poll on Exporter. He’s kind of cute, sort of a quinsessential sports guy, a meat and potatoes fellow through and through. He is very basic, down to earth, straight forward, cut to the chase. He doesn’t eat quiche and strongly identifies with Tim Allen of “Tool Time”. 😃
Hey, White Dove, all the things you said about me are probably true. Yep, you got the meat and potatos right. I don’t know what “quiche” is. BUT, who’s this dude “Tim”? Does he walk funny? I never trusted a man named “Tim”. (Tiny Tim, Timmy or Tim Tam uhgg)
*:tsktsk: *
 
Exporter said:
There is a thread that asks about the Arrogance & Intolerance of “Traditional Catholics”.

I believe that the traditional Catholic is no more arrogant nor intolerant than any other Catholic group.

I ask, IF the Nontraditional Catholic, the Modernists, the Liberals, the ones who want to change the Mass and the ones who want to change the role of women in the Church ARE NOT EVEN MORE INTOLERANT while walking an ARROGANT walk, don’t you agree.

There are at least two threads on this Forum on which a traditional or conservative statement is met with intolerance and harsh words.

This poster says the nontraditionalists are arrogant and lack tolerance. Any comments?
Click to expand...
Hello, I think God led me here. I was using google to check the spelling on the word quintessential, and at the top of the search was this thread! Praise God. I so agree with the opening post! This is the way it is in my parish! The modernists want to just have their own way and change Church teaching, and then point fingers at more traditional people, calling us intolerant! They are bullies in my parish!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top