Articles on "Separated Brethren"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bballer32
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus the Christ doesn’t foster your pandering to pondering. Such rejection of the Christ while claiming to follow the Bible is now habitual.

Accept the clarity and directness of Christ – “This IS My Body” at the Last Supper after carefully teaching in Jn 6:51: “I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh," establishes the reality.

Jn 6:55: For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. And many walked no more with Him. (Jn 6:66). Did he say “you misunderstood Me”? No, He let them go – take note.

Then, to make absolutely certain there was no mistaking what He was saying, Jesus said to the Twelve, “What about you, do you want to go away too?” To which Simon Peter replied, “Lord, who shall we go to? You have the message of eternal life, and we believe” (John 6:59-68).


With Christ’s teaching on His Body to eat and His Blood to drink, He made sure that this was not misunderstood by:
  1. Reemphasizing His teaching and refusing to change it even when many left Him
  2. By questioning, ensuring that His Apostles, with Peter the Supreme Vicar of His Church, understood and assented to His teaching – so clear as to His meaning – that the doubters left Him.
The doubters left Him because they took it literally and did not believe from the beginning.

There is no evidence that the apostles took it literally at this point, none.

There is evidence the false disciples took it literally.
 
With Christ’s teaching on His Body to eat and His Blood to drink, He made sure that this was not misunderstood by:
  1. Reemphasizing His teaching and refusing to change it even when many left Him
He used such language, even hyperbole, precisely to chase them away.
 
Where do you get the idea that they “did not believe from the beginning”?
Oh they believed alright, that He could take care of them , even feed them, and do wondrous works and perhaps save them …from hunger, disease, the Romans, or at least bring back the Glory days and re-establish the Davidic Kingdom…they believed alright, yet they had it all wrong, and envisioned what Satan offered the Lord, to be King of kings. They totally forgot John the Baptist’s message and behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.

John 2:23,4, "many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles, but Jesus did not commit himself to them,because He knew all men

John 6 :15 “Jesus perceived they would make him king by force”

John 6:64,66 " For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not…from that time many disciples left…"
 
Oh they believed alright, that He could take care of them , even feed them, and do wondrous works and perhaps save them …from hunger, disease, the Romans, or at least bring back the Glory days and re-establish the Davidic Kingdom…they believed alright, yet they had it all wrong, and envisioned what Satan offered the Lord, to be King of kings. They totally forgot John the Baptist’s message and behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.

John 2:23,4, "many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles, but Jesus did not commit himself to them,because He knew all men

John 6 :15 “Jesus perceived they would make him king by force”

John 6:64 " For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not…
But how do you know that the people who left doubted from the beginning?

How do you know that one of these folks who left wasn’t the Good Thief, St. Dismas?

How do you know that these grumblers didn’t come back and repent?
 
benhur #340
There is no evidence that the apostles took it literally at this point, none.
Totally false.

Such unbelievable rejection of the Christ in the denial of the history in the Sacred Scriptures is the hallmark of the selfist who is so immersed in his own selfism that even after the fact of the words of the Savior and St Peter’s acceptance of the reality he refuses to assent to the reality

The confusion and rejection of the Christ, His teaching, and the truth preserved by His Church here is endless, even when the reality is so clearly expressed by St Peter upon whom, and no other, Christ bestowed the leadership of His Catholic Church, which Scripture benhur now knows, but rejects:
Then, to make absolutely certain there was no mistaking what He was saying, Jesus said to the Twelve, “What about you, do you want to go away too?” To which Simon Peter replied, “Lord, who shall we go to? You have the message of eternal life, and we believe” (John 6:59-68). [My emphasis].
 
Hi, PR,

Quick question…how do you know the name of the Good Thief from the cross?

Blessings!!

Rita
It’s tradition.

There are numerous Catholic homes for the needy/poor/addicted/homeless named after this saint–Dismas House, Dismas Home, St. Dismas Society, etc etc
 
It’s tradition.

There are numerous Catholic homes for the needy/poor/addicted/homeless named after this saint–Dismas House, Dismas Home, St. Dismas Society, etc etc
Thanks, never heard it before… 🤷

😃 Blessings to you!

Rita
 
How do you know that one of these folks who left wasn’t the Good Thief, St. Dismas?
Strictly speaking, he was the Repentant Thief, not the Good Thief. He was a thief, after all, and that’s not good 🙂

We now return to our regularly scheduled thread.
 
\

There is no evidence that the apostles took it literally at this point, none.

.
And what is your evidence the did not? Can you present your evidence here for all to examine your conclusion?
 
And what is your evidence the did not? Can you present your evidence here for all to examine your conclusion?
I am not alledging literal understanding of eating to Peter’s words, you are. I have no evidence for something that did not happen or was not said.
 
But how do you know that the people who left doubted from the beginning?

How do you know that one of these folks who left wasn’t the Good Thief, St. Dismas?

How do you know that these grumblers didn’t come back and repent?
it is in the Catholic text.
 
B]Then, to make absolutely certain there was no mistaking what He was saying,
Yes, and what was He really saying ? The future transubstantiation ? The future consubstantiation ? No, at best only as a secondary lesson, but not primary. Jesus had bigger fish to fry, like plain old unbelief, and in disciples ! Jesus said to the Twelve,
“What about you, do you want to go away too?” To which Simon Peter replied, “Lord, who shall we go to? You have the message of eternal life, and we believe” (John 6:59-68).
[My emphasis].
See, Jesus stopped talking as soon as faith was professed, His primary goal. Faith in Christ, not withstanding any future mode of eucharisting remembrance. "We believe " in You . Those who departed did not.

I do not reject the main theme of 71 verses of John 6, to believe on the Lord Jesus as the Christ , and that is a special work and drawing of the Father. All other faith and following is vanity.

Blessings Abu
 
What did the first Christians believe:

12652 Jn 6,52-54

AUG. The Jews not understanding what was the bread of A peace, strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us His flesh to eat? Whereas they who eat the bread strive not among themselves, for God makes them to dwell together in unity.

BEDE. The Jews thought that our Lord would divide His flesh into pieces, and give it them to eat: and so mistaking Him, strove.

CHRYS. AS they thought it impossible that He should do as He said, i.e. give them His flesh to eat, He shows them that it was not only possible, but necessary: Then said Jesus to them, Verily, verily, I say to you, Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, you have no life in you.

AUG. As if He said, The sense in which that bread is eaten, and the mode of eating it, you know not; but, Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, you have no life in you.

BEDE And that this might not seem addressed to them alone, He declares universally, Whoso eats My flash, and drinks My blood, has eternal life.

AUG. And that they might not understand him to speak of this life, and make that an occasion of striving, He adds, has eternal life. This then he has not who eats not that flesh, nor drinks that blood. The temporal life men may have without Him, the eternal they cannot. This is not true of material food. If we do not take that indeed, we shall not live, neither do we live, if we take it: for either disease, or old age, or some accident kills us after all. Whereas this meat and drink, i.e. the Body and Blood of Christ, is such that he that takes it not has not life, and he that takes it has life, even life eternal.

THEOPHYL. For it is not the flesh of man simply, but of God: and it makes man divine, by inebriating him, as it were, with divinity.

AUG. There are some who promise men deliverance from eternal punishment, if they are washed in Baptism and partake of Christ’s Body, whatever lives they live. The Apostle however contradicts them, where he says, The works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkeness, revelings, and such like; of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Let us examine what is meant here. He who is in the unity of His body, (i.e. one of the Christian members,) the Sacrament of which body the faithful receive when they communicate at the Altar; he is truly said to eat the body, and drink the blood of Christ. And heretics and schismatics, who are cut off from the unity of the body, may receive the same Sacrament; but it does not profit them, may, rather is hurtful, as tending to make their judgment heavier, or their forgiveness later. Nor ought they to feel secure in their abandoned and damnable ways, who, by the iniquity of their lives, desert righteousness, i.e. Christ; either by fornication, or other sins of the like kind. Such are not to be said to eat the body of Christ; forasmuch as they are not to be counted among the members of Christ For, not to mention other things, men cannot be members of Christ, and at the same time members of an harlot.

AUG. By this meat and drink then, He would have us understand the society of His body, and His members, which is the Church, in the predestined, and called, and justified, and glorified saints and believers. The Sacrament whereof, i.e. Of the unity of the body and blood of Christ, is administered, in some places daily, in others on such and such days from the Lord’s Table: and from the Lord’s Table it is received by some to their salvation, by others to their condemnation. But the thing itself of which this is the Sacrament, is for our salvation to every one who partakes of it, for condemnation to none. To prevent us supposing that those who, by virtue of that meat and drink, were promised eternal life, would not die in the body, Ho adds, And I will raise him up at the last day; i.e. to that eternal life, a spiritual rest, which the spirits of the Saints enter into. But neither shall the body be defrauded of eternal life, but shall be endowed With it at the resurrection of the dead in the last day.
 
12655 Jn 6,55-59

BEDE. He had said above, Whoso eats My flesh and drinks My blood, has eternal life: and now to show the great difference between bodily meat and drink, and the spiritual mystery of His body and blood, Ho adds, For My flesh its meat indeed, and My blood its drink indeed.

CHRYS. i.e. this is no enigma, or parable, but you must really eat the body of Christ; or He means to say that the true meat was He who saved the soul.

AUG. Or thus: Whereas men desire meat and drink to satisfy hunger and thirst, this effect is only really produced by that meat and drink, which makes the receivers of it immortal and incorruptible; i.e. the society of Saints, where is peace and unity, full and perfect. On which account our Lord has chosen for the types of His body and blood, things which become one out of many. Bread is a quantity of grains united into one mass, wine a quantity of grapes squeezed together. Then He explains what it is to eat His body and drink His blood: He that eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, dwells in Me, and I in him. So then to partake of that meat and that drink, is to dwell in Christ and Christ in you. He that dwells not in Christ, and in whom Christ dwells not, neither eats His flesh, nor drinks His blood: but rather eats and drinks the sacrament of it to his own damnation.

CHRYS. Or, having given a promise of eternal life to those that eat Him, He says this to confirm it: He that eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, dwells in Me, and I in him.

AUG. As for those, as indeed there are many, who either eat that flesh and drink that blood hypocritically, or, who having eaten, become apostates, do they dwell in Christ, and Christ in them? Nay, but there is a certain mode of eating that flesh, and drinking that blood, in the which he that eats and drinks, dwells in Christ, and Christ in him.

AUG. That is to say, such an one eats the body and drinks the blood of Christ not in the sacramental sense, but in reality.

CHRYS. And because I live, it is manifest that he will live also: As the living Father has sent Me, and I live by the Father, even so he that eats Me, even he shall live by Me. As if He said, As the Father lives, so do I live; adding, lest you should think Him unbegotten, By the Father, meaning that He has His source in the Father. He that eats Me, even he shall live by Me; the life here meant is not life simply, but the justified life: for even unbelievers live, who never eat of that flesh at all. Nor is it of the general resurrection He speaks, (for all will rise again,) but of the resurrection to glory, and reward.

AUG. He said not, As I eat the Father, and live by the Father, so he that eats Me, even he shall live by Me. For the Son does not grow better by partaking of the Father, as we do by partaking of the Son, i.e. of His one body and blood, which this eating and drinking signifies. So that His saying, I live by the Father, because He is from Him, must not be understood as detracting from His equality. Nor do the words, Even he that eats Me, the same shall live by Me, give us the equality that He has. He does not equalize, but only mediates between God and man. If, however, we understand the words, I live by the Father, in the sense of those below, My Father is greater than I, then it is as if He said, That I live by the Father, i.e. refer my life to Him, as my superior, my humiliation in my incarnation is the cause; but He who lives by Me, lives by Me by virtue of partaking of My flesh.

HILARY. Of the truth then of the body and blood of Christ, no room for doubting remains: for, by the declaration of our Lord Himself, and by the teaching of our own faith, the flesh is really flesh, and the blood really blood. This then is our principle of life. While we are in the flesh, Christ dwells in us by His flesh. And we shall live by Him, according as He lives. If then we live naturally by partaking of Him according to the flesh, He also lives naturally by the indwelling of the Father according to the Spirit. His birth did not give Him an alien or different nature from the Father.

AUG. That we who cannot obtain eternal life of ourselves, might live by the eating that bread, He descended from heaven: This is the bread which comes down from heaven.

HILARY. He calls Himself the bread, because He is the origin of His own body. And lest it should be thought that the virtue and nature of the Word had given way to the flesh, He calls the bread His flesh, that, inasmuch as the bread came down from heaven, it might be seen that His body was not of human conception, but a heavenly body. To say that the bread is His own, is to declare that the Word assumed His body Himself.

THEOPHYL. For we do not eat God simply, God being impalpable and incorporeal; nor again, the flesh of man simply, which would not profit us. But God having taken flesh into union with Himself; that flesh is quickening. Not that it has changed its own for the Divine nature; but, just as heated iron remains iron, with the action of the heat in it; so our Lord’s flesh is quickening, as being the flesh of the Word of God.

BEDE. And to show the wide interval between the shadow and the light, the type and the reality, He adds, Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eats of this bread shall live for ever.

AUG. The death here meant is death eternal. For even those who eat Christ are subject to natural death; but they live for ever, because Christ is everlasting life.
 
CHRYS. For if it was possible without harvest or fruit of the earth, or any such thing, to preserve the lives of the Israelites of old for forty years, much more will He be able to do this with that spiritual food, of which the manna is the type. He knew how precious a thing life was in men’s eyes, and therefore repeats His promise of life often; just as the Old Testament had done; only that it only offered length of life, He life without end. This promise was an abolition of that sentence of death, which sin had brought upon us. These things said He in the synagogue, as He taught in Capernaum; where many displays of His power took place. He taught in the synagogue and in the temple, with the view of attracting the multitude, and as a sign that He was not acting in opposition to the Father.

BEDE. Mystically, Capernaum, which means beautiful town, stands for the world: the synagogue, for the Jewish people. The meaning is, that our Lord has, by the mystery of the incarnation, manifested Himself to tile world, and also taught the Jewish people His doctrines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top