P
PJM
Guest
Here my friends in an opportunity to ask that question you’ve “alway’s” wnated to ask
God Bless,
Pat
God Bless,
Pat
I’m Catholic and I used to be in the choir, so I’d have to argue with your assessment of Catholics not being able to sing!Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
No just kidding, that’s not my real question.
OK, this is a toughy, so I apologize: If the Pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church and Peter was the first Pope, why does Peter refer to himself as only a fellow elder in 1 Peter?
I’ve always thought that that was a case for giving the Pope the status of First Among Equals. Or, perhaps the context of this particular verse should be taken into consideration.
Anyhow, this is not something that keeps me up at night, so don’t do a lot of research to find an answer. It’s just a bit of curiosity on my part.
It’s called being pastoral. Some have it, some don’t.OK, this is a toughy, so I apologize: If the Pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church and Peter was the first Pope, why does Peter refer to himself as only a fellow elder in 1 Peter?
You ask a interesting question and being Anglican, one would think I should know the answer since the See of Canterbury is First Among Equals. Don’t take what I’m about to say as gospel, but I take it to mean:What does “first among equals” mean? How does his authority differ from the second, third, or fourth among equals?
I’m actually curious about the answer(s) in the book . Could it have anything to do with the changes in the Mass ( and the music ) post Vatican ll ? I’m old enough to remember the Mass pre-Vatican ll , and I thought we did a better job , in general , back then . No insult to today’s choirs .Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
No just kidding, that’s not my real question.![]()
I am beginning to suspect that it is because Catholic hymnals are quite badly written - or at least, the one I’m using certainly seems to be. I have been fighting for several weeks now to find a piano player who can play a few simple Christmas melodies for our Christmas pageant. Not being a musician myself, I just give them the numbers in the hymnal, but so far I can’t find a single piano player who can just play the right notes for the melody so that a few three year olds can sing along. Not. a. single. one. And these are all people who have taken piano lessons - this should not be so difficult.Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
No just kidding, that’s not my real question.![]()
As an analogy, when the President of the United States (the most powerful human being on earth) says, “My fellow Americans,” does he mean to say that he is giving up all of his power to become an ordinary American citizen? Not at all. And when St. Peter said “My fellow elders,” he also didn’t mean to be giving up the position that Jesus gave him as chief shepherd of the Church (John 21:15-19) to become just an ordinary elder.OK, this is a toughy, so I apologize: If the Pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church and Peter was the first Pope, why does Peter refer to himself as only a fellow elder in 1 Peter?
I think you hit the nail on the head, but I honestly don’t know much about the premise of the book. I hear the title tossed around on occasion in Anglican and classical music circles.I’m actually curious about the answer(s) in the book . Could it have anything to do with the changes in the Mass ( and the music ) post Vatican ll ? I’m old enough to remember the Mass pre-Vatican ll , and I thought we did a better job , in general , back then . No insult to today’s choirs .
I still prefer the more traditional church music .
Thanks .Fair enough . I won’t turn this into an " ask an Anglican " thread .I think you hit the nail on the head, but I honestly don’t know much about the premise of the book. I hear the title tossed around on occasion in Anglican and classical music circles.
We Episcopalians are required to have 6 years of voice lessons in order to be confirmed.
Now no more taking me with you on tangents, or I’m going to owe the OP a big apology and a gift basket.![]()
If a tree falls and no one is there to catch it, can it sue?If a tree falls and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
Thomas Day should have listened to Feirouz’s Good Friday lamentations.Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
As long as it doesn’t do so on Church property, or during a Church-sponsored outing, we’re okay.If a tree falls and no one is there to catch it, can it sue?
I’m from the same time period as far as pre-Vat II goes, but my parish still has a very good choir. I think a lot depends on the music director and their music choices. We have an excellent director, which might be the result of our Pastor, who has a family background in music. One of his sister’s is an opera singer in NY, and the other is a music director at another local parish. He has a beautiful voice, as well. So, he’s very careful in his choices of music, and he takes an active role in picking it out with the director. It’s usually very traditional. We’re also very blessed to have so many excellent singers and other musicians for such a small town parish. We have a professional organist and a couple of acoustic guitarists, which is also a big plus. During Christmas and Easter services, our pastor always sings a major part as a solo, or sometimes with his sister, as a duet. It’s really amazing to hear the beautiful music that comes out of such a tiny little parish choir.I’m actually curious about the answer(s) in the book . Could it have anything to do with the changes in the Mass ( and the music ) post Vatican ll ? I’m old enough to remember the Mass pre-Vatican ll , and I thought we did a better job , in general , back then . No insult to today’s choirs .
I still prefer the more traditional church music .
yes and noIf a tree falls and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
How many angels really can dance on the head of a pin? I’m cheating, of course, being I’m Catholic I already know the answer-I’d just like confirm it with yours.Here my friends in an opportunity to ask that question you’ve “alway’s” wnated to ask
God Bless,
Pat
(Another tangent…)Thomas Day should have listened to Feirouz’s Good Friday lamentations.![]()
Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
No just kidding, that’s not my real question.![]()
The answer seems simple to me, so maybe I’m missing something. The Pope is the Bishop of Rome, so he could greet all of the Bishops in the world as “fellow bishops”, but this does not absolutely equate all of their offices. There are three basic offices in the hierarchy: bishop, priest, and deacon. Of these three, certainly Peter and the other elders would have fallen into the “bishop” category. Your thoughts?OK, this is a toughy, so I apologize: If the Pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church and Peter was the first Pope, why does Peter refer to himself as only a fellow elder in 1 Peter?
I’ve always thought that that was a case for giving the Pope the status of First Among Equals. Or, perhaps the context of this particular verse should be taken into consideration.
=Conor7;8681259]Why can’t Catholics sing, as mused by Thomas Day in his book, Why Catholics Can’t Sing?
No just kidding, that’s not my real question.![]()
OK, this is a toughy, so I apologize: If the Pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church and Peter was the first Pope, why does Peter refer to himself as only a fellow elder in 1 Peter?
I’ve always thought that that was a case for giving the Pope the status of First Among Equals. Or, perhaps the context of this particular verse should be taken into consideration.
GREAT Question:thumbsup:Anyhow, this is not something that keeps me up at night, so don’t do a lot of research to find an answer. It’s just a bit of curiosity on my part.