Ask a Gnostic Anything

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sophia_Christ
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know it as well as you can know anything from history prior to the creation of recording devices, and my faith comes from accepting that through God these things are possible, while not fully understanding how.

Christ is the Answer: #734: Reasons to Believe

This program goes into fine detail about why we can conclude that the accounts of the Apostles are trustworthy, and about why denouncing them as fabrications is a fairly irrational position to hold. That’s an mp3 download, but you can also find it on the ave maria radio website. This episode was last played on December 4th, 2014.
As I previously stated, my theology does not hinge on whether or not the events of the New Testament literally took place. I am not denouncing the apostles as fabricators nor am I affirming the fact that the events of Gospels happened exactly as they were recorded. What is important to me are the allegorical and symbolic messages associated with these events-fact or fiction, literal or exaggerated
 
As I previously stated, my theology does not hinge on whether or not the events of the New Testament literally took place. I am not denouncing the apostles as fabricators nor am I affirming the fact that the events of Gospels happened exactly as they were recorded. What is important to me are the allegorical and symbolic messages associated with these events-fact or fiction, literal or exaggerated
But if they did happen as recorded in the Bible, that means that Jesus Christ literally proclaimed himself to be God. If that’s true, wouldn’t that be far, far more important than any interpreted allegory or symbolism?
 
Not at all!

In short, I came to a point in my spiritual journey where I accepted that this universe has a creator. So, naturally the elementary question arose as to how this creator could design a world in which there was genocide, pedophilia, disease, etc. and I found there were two reasonable explanations:
  1. This universe was created by a perfect, benevolent being who uses Earth as a sort of prison house for creatures that have accrued bad Karma in past lives. Through proper spiritual disciplines, man can transcend this world of suffering and enter into a heavenly realm. This is the teaching of the Vaisnava schools of Hinduism.
    Code:
                                                or
  2. This universe was created by an imperfect being; therefore the creation is imperfect. Hence, all the sufferings in the world. However, human beings have one foot in one door and one foot in the other-meaning they have spiritual potential but may also be conditioned by material nature. By devoting all of our energy towards the spiritual we can transcend the phenomenal world and enter into a heavenly realm. This is the Gnostic teaching.
I eliminated the first option because I could still not wrap my head around the concept of a perfect, benevolent being creating such a miserable world for us and knowingly placing us in it.
Thank you for the reply. Since you believe in number two (the gnostic explanation), which says that creation is imperfect because it was created by an imperfect being, how is non-human creation (for instance, the earth, including animals and plant life, etc.) imperfect?
 
That’s not an insult and he already said “no disrespect”. YOU came here, inviting questions. I assume it’s not too much to ask about your credentials as well as motives, both for coming here and your choice of spirituality.

BTW, thank you for answering my question about Wicca.

Edit: Oops, sorry rasbat, I did not see your response above.
If you read post #38, you will see that I have apologized if I sounded flippant in my initial response.

My initial response was worded in the way it was because I wanted to answer questions about the Gnostic worldview, not be psychologically patronized. But upon further reflection, I realized that this was not Rasbat’s intention and he/she was just merely trying to make sure I wasn’t one of those ‘New-Agey’ Gnostic types who doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously.

I apologize for the confusion.
 
If you read post #38, you will see that I have apologized if I sounded flippant in my initial response.

My initial response was worded in the way it was because I wanted to answer questions about the Gnostic worldview, not be psychologically patronized. But upon further reflection, I realized that this was not Rasbat’s intention and he/she was just merely trying to make sure I wasn’t one of those ‘New-Agey’ Gnostic types who doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously.

I apologize for the confusion.
Thank you for clearing this up. Yes, please do excuse the “poking with stick”. You are new and different. 🙂
 
Thank you for the reply. Since you believe in number two (the gnostic explanation), which says that creation is imperfect because it was created by an imperfect being, how is non-human creation (for instance, the earth, including animals and plant life, etc.) imperfect?
Animals are prone to suffering, pain, death. Different species of animals and plants have gone extinct or destroyed ecosystems throughout time. Carnivores must slaughter other creatures to survive and herbivores must eat plants that have grown from the earth, etc.
 
But if they did happen as recorded in the Bible, that means that Jesus Christ literally proclaimed himself to be God. If that’s true, wouldn’t that be far, far more important than any interpreted allegory or symbolism?
Again, we would interpret this from an allegorical angle; meaning that when Jesus proclaimed himself to be God, he meant that he had transcended to a form of consciousness that was completely detached from the world and therefore divine.
 
Again, we would interpret this from an allegorical angle; meaning that when Jesus proclaimed himself to be God, he meant that he had transcended to a form of consciousness that was completely detached from the world and therefore divine.
Does that mean that once you, personally, become detached from the world, you could claim to be God?
 
Is the material world totally without value? To be escaped from at any cost?
The material world is totally without value. Although I prefer the term ‘transcend’ to ‘escape.’ Also, it depends what you mean by ‘any cost.’ Obviously suicide or excessive drug use would not be an acceptable way to remove yourself from the material world.
 
Animals are prone to suffering, pain, death. Different species of animals and plants have gone extinct or destroyed ecosystems throughout time. Carnivores must slaughter other creatures to survive and herbivores must eat plants that have grown from the earth, etc.
True…and yet these ecosystems still work exceedingly well. Everything that a human being needs to survive and thrive is available on the earth, such as sunlight, water, the exact oxygenation of the air for what we need to breathe. Also every sort of food that we need to sustain life, including shelter and clothing are here.
 
Again, we would interpret this from an allegorical angle; meaning that when Jesus proclaimed himself to be God, he meant that he had transcended to a form of consciousness that was completely detached from the world and therefore divine.
So, basically what you’re saying, is that you completely ignore the context and words of the scripture, and make up your own meaning…?

He LITERALLY says “I AM;” he uses -the- name that God used to reveal himself to Moses. He wasn’t saying “I’ve transcended your reality,” or “achieved some higher plane of existence.” He is literally proclaiming himself to be The Creator, no some imperfect knockoff. This proclamation is completely incompatible with your interpretation of scripture.
 
The material world is totally without value. Although I prefer the term ‘transcend’ to ‘escape.’ Also, it depends what you mean by ‘any cost.’ Obviously suicide or excessive drug use would not be an acceptable way to remove yourself from the material world.
See that’s where you loose me. If this material universe, our bodies, this earth, everything contained therein are without value… Why is suicide not the most perfect thing one can do? The ultimate act of transcending this pathetic reality which is no reality at all and making the ultimate choice of rejecting this illusion and moving on to what is infinitely better? You can only say that suicide is not an option if there is something to be gained here, but what is to be gained here except distraction from perfect transcendence?

I would ask then, is suicide some how a condemnable offence?
 
Does that mean that once you, personally, become detached from the world, you could claim to be God?
If you are completely detached from the sensory world and completely, 100% absorbed in God consciousness then the distinction between yourself and God disappears. You have surrendered your existence entirely to the Lord in that case. That being said, I have never heard of another individual outside of Jesus who has been able to achieve this spiritual level yet still be able to function in the material world. That is what makes Jesus a unique enigma and is why Gnostics venerate him.
 
Hello everyone!

I am a Christian Gnostic-Ask me anything at all
I know very little about modern-day Christian Gnosticism. Do Christian Gnostic’s claim to possess an elevated knowledge i.e. a higher truth known only to a select few, as was the case long ago?
 
If you are completely detached from the sensory world and completely, 100% absorbed in God consciousness then the distinction between yourself and God disappears. You have surrendered your existence entirely to the Lord in that case. That being said, I have never heard of another individual outside of Jesus who has been able to achieve this spiritual level yet still be able to function in the material world. That is what makes Jesus a unique enigma and is why Gnostics venerate him.
But he never once claims to have done this, and the only texts which claim he did weren’t written until several centuries after his death.
 
Your definition of Gnostic is correct. Different Gnostic schools have different interpretations on of Jesus depending on their orthodoxy. The school that I subscribe to sees the question of whether Jesus was purely spirit, purely human, or both as irrelevant. The Gnostics interpret scripture as myth; not in the sense that they are not true but that they are symbolic stories with a purpose.
Symbolic stories i.e. the actual events never occurred?
 
Do Gnostics believe in the Original sin, if so in what way?

Thanks,🙂
 
So, basically what you’re saying, is that you completely ignore the context and words of the scripture, and make up your own meaning…?

He LITERALLY says “I AM;” he uses -the- name that God used to reveal himself to Moses. He wasn’t saying “I’ve transcended your reality,” or “achieved some higher plane of existence.” He is literally proclaiming himself to be The Creator, no some imperfect knockoff. This proclamation is completely incompatible with your interpretation of scripture.
Why is it so absurd to take that passage to mean that he has achieved a level of consciousness in which there is no distinction between himself and the Father?
 
Gnosticism was suppressed by the powers that be in the beginning of the 3rd century AD.
Who are you referring to when you say - the powers that be? The Catholic Church at this time was also being oppressed by the Roman Empire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top