Ask a Pagan (Again!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lokabrenna
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But to answer your question, I’d trust that the deities would never give me a challenge that they knew I couldn’t handle, to do otherwise would destroy my trust in them, and if I don’t trust them, why continue to honour them?
Can you give me an example of evidence that your Nordic god/goddess wouldn’t ever demand that you continue in a pregnancy? You say that there’s a lot of lore that’s merely entertainment, so I guess we should dismiss those writings.

You say that there is textual evidence as well as archeological evidence that supports how you know this? Can you provide sources for this?
 
I went off on a bit of a tangent there, but what I am trying to say is that gods do not necessarily have “position statements” that their followers need to adopt (assuming they have any position on a particular issue) just like some humans don’t have a particular opinion on certain issues.
Fair enough.

So that brings me back to my previous point about why you believe that your gods/goddesses wouldn’t demand that you continue in your pregnancy?

Doesn’t it seem a bit like you’re projecting your own views upon these gods/goddesses? Aren’t they entities of their own thoughts/ideas?
 
Sometimes 2+2 does not equal 4. There’s a whole branch of philosophical math where there’s more than one answer to a question. I was very good at that sort of math!

Sometimes it equals 9. 😃 LOL…You definitely get points for originality 👍 but I have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you could elaborate?
The notion that there is “one truth” that applies to everyone isn’t something that most (if any) Pagans believe.
 
That’s cool. Different strokes for different folks. :)👍
But you guys (Joe, Loka) don’t really believe this, right?

You really don’t believe that it’s just fine for a person to practice and believe anything he wants–I’m pretty certain about that.

What you actually mean, if I may be so presumptive, is “Different strokes for different folks, within a certain parameter that I have deemed ok”.

Right?
 
But you guys (Joe, Loka) don’t really believe this, right?

You really don’t believe that it’s just fine for a person to practice and believe anything he wants–I’m pretty certain about that.

What you actually mean, if I may be so presumptive, is “Different strokes for different folks, within a certain parameter that I have deemed ok”.

Right?
Beliefs in and of themselves can’t hurt anyone, that’s why the emphasis is on actions, more specifically, actions as a result of beliefs. You are perfectly free to believe that abortion is wrong, for instance. Where I would judge someone in this case is what course of action they adopt in response to that belief. In this case, do you protest peacefully in front of clinics, or do you blow them up and kill the doctors who provide abortions? I can’t see anyone having a problem with the first, but the second, the second option seems to me to be so anti-life as to be completely missing the point (besides being domestic terrorism).

Now, which action do you think benefits the pro-life cause more?

Oh, and of course you are free to have your beliefs, just as I am free to have different beliefs. (Actually, I think when it comes to abortion that both sides want the same thing, we just have different ways of going about it.)
 
Having a belief that abortion is okay is a harm to someone else. So, its not just a matter of preference. The rights of individuals are at stake. The fact that embryos and fetuses are too small to defend themselves against the onslaught the way I or someone else could seems to be the difference.

No thanks. I prefer the theocracy of Christianity which would insist on human rights and decent behavior over willy-nilly whatever the stronger party prefers’ governance any day. It would even be worth fighting for. Even dying for. I think this is what is happening in some parts of the world. Your brand of religion just happens to be passive-aggressive, passive-resistant as opposed to aggressive, as is the Muslim religion. The outcome seems to be the same. If it suits you to get rid of a person, and he is helpless to stop you, it’s A-ok.
 
This is all very intresting, but I find it hard to believe you actually believe there’s some entity by the name of ________ (insert the name of god), you have never actually seen, indulging you.
Well, to be fair, some would say the same thing applies to monotheists. My experience has been that atheists generally think every theist (poly-, mono-, whatever) is crazy, they just tend to like my side more because I don’t go around trying to make everyone else believe in my particular brand of crazy.
You systematically reject the notion that these entities could be demons of Christian teaching. Demons would indulge your senses any way you pleased, if for no other purpose than to break any relationship with God you may heretofore had, and likely do worse harm, if able.
It honestly seems to me that demons could be doing so much more to damn humanity en masse rather than spend time coddling an individual, that’s just a waste of effort. It reminds me of one of the initial scenes in Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, in which three demons are discussing what they have done to bring souls to Hell. Two of them boast about tempting a woman and a priest respectively, the third says that he merely caused all portable phones in the area to jam up for 45 minutes during lunch time, it doesn’t sound like he’s accomplished much, but a paragraph later it explains that the humans who were affected end up sinning all on their own, without prompting, based on how they reacted to the event (in anger, which they took out on anyone closest to them).
Since these entities of inspiration are unseen by you, why do you think they are intrerested in your well-being? Are you going on faith that these “deities” think you are worthy of attention? It makes more sense to me that someone or something is having “fun” with you, stroking your ego, perhaps? It seems very risky to me.
Well, if they are, they must be doing something right, because I’ve never been happier! Honestly, if they are demons who have the goal of leading me into a life of sin, they are failing at it. I’ve never drank, smoked, done drugs, had sex, gone to wild parties, or committed a crime (and they say we Pagans are all hedonists, HA!) and yet, if I recall correctly, I’m still going to end up in line for Hell (for eternity!) because I don’t happen to share your belief system (not to mention, according to you, everyone’s being punished because our first parents decided to have a theological discussion with a talking serpent).

In all honesty, I can’t find it in me to honour a deity who is that vindictive. My gods can be vengeful, but at least they’re up front about it! They aren’t perfect, but I honestly wouldn’t have it any other way. It makes them more interesting, IMO.
 
Beliefs in and of themselves can’t hurt anyone, that’s why the emphasis is on actions, more specifically, actions as a result of beliefs. You are perfectly free to believe that abortion is wrong, for instance. Where I would judge someone in this case is what course of action they adopt in response to that belief. In this case, do you protest peacefully in front of clinics, or do you blow them up and kill the doctors who provide abortions? I can’t see anyone having a problem with the first, but the second, the second option seems to me to be so anti-life as to be completely missing the point (besides being domestic terrorism).

Now, which action do you think benefits the pro-life cause more?

Oh, and of course you are free to have your beliefs, just as I am free to have different beliefs. (Actually, I think when it comes to abortion that both sides want the same thing, we just have different ways of going about it.)
Actually, if you’ll note, I also mentioned practice.

Would it be correct to say that you don’t* really* believe this “different strokes for different folks” paradigm, as it applies to various beliefs AND practices?
 
Can you give me an example of evidence that your Nordic god/goddess wouldn’t ever demand that you continue in a pregnancy? You say that there’s a lot of lore that’s merely entertainment, so I guess we should dismiss those writings.

You say that there is textual evidence as well as archeological evidence that supports how you know this? Can you provide sources for this?
Hi, Loka. Could you please address this post? Thanks.
 
Fair enough.

So that brings me back to my previous point about why you believe that your gods/goddesses wouldn’t demand that you continue in your pregnancy?

Doesn’t it seem a bit like you’re projecting your own views upon these gods/goddesses? Aren’t they entities of their own thoughts/ideas?
And this one?
 
and yet, if I recall correctly, I’m still going to end up in line for Hell (for eternity!) because I don’t happen to share your belief system
I’m not sure what you think you “recall.” This has not been Catholic teaching since much longer than any of us on this forum have been alive (certainly by the 19th century it was accepted that “invincible ignorance” was not culpable, though admittedly the position was greatly broadened at Vatican II). If you “recall” conservative Protestant teaching, why assume that the people you are talking to on a Catholic forum share that teaching.
(not to mention, according to you, everyone’s being punished because our first parents decided to have a theological discussion with a talking serpent).
Since you have admirably and patiently spent a lot of time on this forum explaining neopaganism, you might profit from spending some of that time learning what we Christians–Catholics in particular–actually believe.

The historic Christian position is, in my opinion, best summed up by St. Athanasius: humans chose to turn away from God who is the source of life, and thus became subject to decay, death, and corruption of all kinds. The “talking serpent” story is a symbolic, mythical way of talking about that choice.
Well, I couldn’t either. We entirely share disbelief in what you think Christianity is:p. And from my perspective (and, I suspect, that of most of the Catholics on this forum–bear in mind that I’m not quite Catholic!), disbelief in a false version of God is in no way culpable, but indeed admirable.
However, bear in mind that in the orthodox Christian view God is much less like what you call a “deity” than you and I are like slugs.
My gods can be vengeful, but at least they’re up front about it! They aren’t perfect, but I honestly wouldn’t have it any other way. It makes them more interesting, IMO.
Clearly what you mean by a “deity” and what we mean by God is, as I said above, very different:)

Edwin
 
it’s also important to understand that gods aren’t static entities that are stuck in the mythic past; they’ve grown and changed and adapted. The gods of today are not exactly the ones that were worshiped by our ancestors. I’m not the same person that I was ten years ago,…I think most of us can agree that the modern Church isn’t exactly like the Medieval Church, because we moderns aren’t Medieval people.
Thank you for such a clear answer.

It highlights a basic difference between our belief systems.

Based on your answer, one would expect a much closer correlation between a medieval Catholic and modern one than between a medieval pagan and a modern one.
 
PRmerger;8569829]But you guys (Joe, Loka) don’t really believe this, right?
You really don’t believe that it’s just fine for a person to practice and believe anything he wants–I’m pretty certain about that…
Of course not. But I do respect everyone’s right to believe whatever they want to believe…If someone wants to put their faith in something pagan I suppose he or she has their reasons, even if those reasons make no sense to me, which is why I said:

Different strokes for different folks…👍
 
LOL, “ask a pagan”? Why would I?

I’ll share the Good News of Christ with them, but I’m not curious about paganism in the least. I know why the devil leads people to hell. I don’t need to inquire among his followers.
 
Of course not. But I do respect everyone’s right to believe whatever they want to believe…If someone wants to put their faith in something pagan I suppose he or she has their reasons, even if those reasons make no sense to me, which is why I said:

Different strokes for different folks…👍
Arrggh. That mantra just drives me batty coming from thinking people.

What you really mean is “different strokes from different folks, given certain parameters”.

Do you really want to tell the NAMBLA people that mantra? Even if they never actually act on their position, are you really going to shrug off and repeat that mantra to a NAMBLA proponent?
 
Arrggh. That mantra just drives me batty coming from thinking people.

What you really mean is “different strokes from different folks, given certain parameters”.

Do you really want to tell the NAMBLA people that mantra? Even if they never actually act on their position, are you really going to shrug off and repeat that mantra to a NAMBLA proponent?
"Arrggh…"LOL…I get your frustration but it is what it is…Best to just roll with the punches when there is no alternative…👍
 
"Arrggh…"LOL…I get your frustration but it is what it is…Best to just roll with the punches when there is no alternative…👍
Arrgggh squared.

Of course there is an alternative. What the heck?? Say: there are some things that we can agree to disagree on (like, for example, whether brides should wear red on their wedding day (as they do in China) or white (Western culture)…different strokes for different folks…

But as far as believing in different gods, practicing pedophilia, homosexuality, abortion, adultery, etc etc etc…no, NOT different strokes for different folks.

Sheesh!
 
Arrgggh squared.

Of course there is an alternative. What the heck?? Say: there are some things that we can agree to disagree on (like, for example, whether brides should wear red on their wedding day (as they do in China) or white (Western culture)…different strokes for different folks…

But as far as believing in different gods, practicing pedophilia, homosexuality, abortion, adultery, etc etc etc…no, NOT different strokes for different folks.

Sheesh!
I agree with what you have said of course. I just meant: if someone is 100% adamant on something, such as paganism, there is not much you can do to change their mind…🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top