O
openmind77
Guest
I am sure you mean well, but to the rest of us, the belief that some guy born 200 hundred years ago and long since dead, is the expected Mahdi, is really not that interesting. If true, he did not accomplished not very much - the world is pretty much the way he found it, probably worse.NOTE I am truly hoping to learn something on this thread. As my background is originally Christian, my familiarity with the depths of Islam is limited to what I have learned through several readings of the Quran, what has come to me through the Baha’i Faith, and a few other books, chief among them: Muhammad and the Course of Islam, by Balyuzi, George Ronald Press.
There is a difference between literal interpretations of prophecy and symbolic. While the Bab was a direct descendent of Muhammad, He was not a thousand years old, yet the essence of His reality was that He claimed for Himself the station of “The Gate”, the Qaim, the Promised Mahdi.
Even as John the Baptist fulfilled the prophecy of the coming of Elijah the Prophet necessary before the coming of the Messiah (Jesus), he was not the same physical person. The rose of this spring brings the same beauty and fragrance of last year’s rose, and in one sense, is the return of that rose, while in an individual earthly sense it is not. Such was the case with John the Baptist. Such is the case with the Bab.
His followers would raise the cry: “Ya Sahib u Zaman!” O Lord of the Age whenever they were attacked.
Let us just assume for the sake of this thread that the Imam has not already come and gone and is yet to arrive.