Ask an Anglican/Episcopalian

  • Thread starter Thread starter aidanbradypop
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if the Anglicans/ Episcopalians who officially dialogue with Roman Catholics are like their counterparts in Lutheranism? Ecumenical work seems to be almost entirely the prerogative of the most “liberal” [for lack of a better word] churches in the Lutheran communion. The most catholic in worship and ecclesiastical polity are generally the most humanistic Lutherans .

Bishop Gladfelter did not seem in any sense liberal. Or, in many senses, Lutheran.

GKC
 
Is TEC formally a province of the Anglican Communion as there is no metropolitan (though I heard your PB wanted to be Archbishop Katherine :))? In the Catholic church, a province, by definition, has a metropolitan.

Was there ever a metropolitan in TEC (or PECUSA)? Why none today? Does this mean ecclesiology in TEC differs from the rest of the Anglican Communion.
 
I wonder if the Anglicans/ Episcopalians who officially dialogue with Roman Catholics are like their counterparts in Lutheranism? Ecumenical work seems to be almost entirely the prerogative of the most “liberal” [for lack of a better word] churches in the Lutheran communion. The most catholic in worship and ecclesiastical polity are generally the most humanistic Lutherans .

By humanistic, you mean liberal? If I am not mistaken, Church of Sweden consecrated a lesbian bishop before TEC did.

What do you mean “liberal” [for lack of a better word]? You mean the equivalent of Low Church? The dialogue group still did pretty good work until the 80’s & 90s. Do you know what became of it?

If the LCMS did not sign the JDDJ but ELCA did, does it mean that LCMS and ELCA have different ideas on what it acceptable under Justification by Faith or is the disagreement more a juridicial thing?

Or am I in the wrong thread? Don’t want to take away Dustin’s and GKC’s stage!😃
 
Not to rehash old discussions, but the website of the ALCC makes it clear that it is an organization for promoting conversion to Catholicism.

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean that he was wrong about a Lutheran ordinariate being in the works, but it *may *have been wishful thinking.
 
I wonder if the Anglicans/ Episcopalians who officially dialogue with Roman Catholics are like their counterparts in Lutheranism? Ecumenical work seems to be almost entirely the prerogative of the most “liberal” [for lack of a better word] churches in the Lutheran communion. The most catholic in worship and ecclesiastical polity are generally the most humanistic Lutherans .

No. The dialogue partners in Anglicanism tend not to be the most conservative Anglo-Catholics, but they do tend to come from the Anglo-Catholic wing and not to be extremely liberal.
 
Is TEC formally a province of the Anglican Communion as there is no metropolitan (though I heard your PB wanted to be Archbishop Katherine :))? In the Catholic church, a province, by definition, has a metropolitan.

Was there ever a metropolitan in TEC (or PECUSA)? Why none today? Does this mean ecclesiology in TEC differs from the rest of the Anglican Communion.
TEC is formally a member of the Anglican Communion. The gracious Katherine is, via a stealth mode of operation, expanding the scope of the office of the PB far beyond its original and customary realm. TEC has historically been an hierarchical Church, up to the dioceses level only; a free association of independent dioceses, ab initio, pre-dating the existence of TEC, whose association was what the form of TEC was.The PB was originally merely the eldest bishop, and the office was conceived as an administrative one. While that role expanded, over the years, the latest moves, which makes it, in effect, a form of archbishopric, relates to the current troubles. The claims that TEC is and has been a formal hierarchy, with the PB at the peak of a pyramid of authority, figured in many of the legal cases that TEC has expended around $26 million on, to retain the property of those parishes/dioceses that leave, without regard to who holds formal title to same. The latest court case, in Illinois, is not going well for TEC on this point, as it did not in the case of the diocese of SC. All too often, it did prevail.

There has never been a metropolitan in the TEC, To that extent, TEC’s ecclesiology and polity differ from others in the Communion. But the current regime seeks to change that. Not for nothing does the gracious Katherine sport that metropolitan crozier. Or point out that TEC has a visible presence in 16 countries. Hardly the fiefdom of a mere PB, in New York, that realm.

GKC
 
Not to rehash old discussions, but the website of the ALCC makes it clear that it is an organization for promoting conversion to Catholicism.

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean that he was wrong about a Lutheran ordinariate being in the works, but it *may *have been wishful thinking.
There certainly was, in the many years that TAC pursued one.

GKC
 
TEC is formally a member of the Anglican Communion. The gracious Katherine is, via a stealth mode of operation, expanding the scope of the office of the PB far beyond its original and customary realm. TEC has historically been an hierarchical Church, up to the dioceses level only; a free association of independent dioceses, ab initio, pre-dating the existence of TEC, whose association was what the form of TEC was.The PB was originally merely the eldest bishop, and the office was conceived as an administrative one. While that role expanded, over the years, the latest moves, which makes it, in effect, a form of archbishopric, relates to the current troubles. The claims that TEC is and has been a formal hierarchy, with the PB at the peak of a pyramid of authority, figured in many of the legal cases that TEC has expended around $26 million on, to retain the property of those parishes/dioceses that leave, without regard to who holds formal title to same. The latest court case, in Illinois, is not going well for TEC on this point, as it did not in the case of the diocese of SC. All too often, it did prevail.

There has never been a metropolitan is the TEC, To that extent, TEC’s ecclesiology and polity differ from others in the Communion. But the current regime seeks to change that. Not for nothing does the gracious Katherine sport that metropolitan crozier. Or point out that TEC has a visible presence in 16 countries. Hardly the fiefdom of a mere PB, in New York, that realm.

GKC
Stealth is the keyword here. Many do not even notice such a move. Not sure if Katherine+ will take it in that direction as she only have a few more years. I want Sean Cardinal O’Malley to come on over and become the PB lol.
 
Stealth is the keyword here. Many do not even notice such a move. Not sure if Katherine+ will take it in that direction as she only have a few more years. I want Sean Cardinal O’Malley to come on over and become the PB lol.
If she does not fully institutionalize the change, in her tenure (and it is not merely a personal aggrandizement that is going on), the process will continue under her successor. This is a structural power grab that is part and parcel of the morphing of TEC, in many dimensions, of theology, liturgy, polity, that occasioned the St. Louis statement and the origin of the first Continuing Anglican movement. It is not going away. It is not retreating. It will be the face of the Episcopalians, hence forth. None can call their power to account. Temporally.

Says me.

GKC
 
If she does not fully institutionalize the change, in her tenure (and it is not merely a personal aggrandizement that is going on), the process will continue under her successor. This is a structural power grab that is part and parcel of the morphing of TEC, in many dimensions, of theology, liturgy , polity, that occasioned the St. Louis statement and the origin of the first Continuing Anglican movement. It is not going away. It is not retreating. It will be the face of the Episcopalians, hence forth. None can call their power to account. Temporally.

Says me.

GKC
🤷
 
Stealth is the keyword here. Many do not even notice such a move. Not sure if Katherine+ will take it in that direction as she only have a few more years. I want Sean Cardinal O’Malley to come on over and become the PB lol.
Makes me grateful for Archbishops Justin and John over here…
 
Stealth is the keyword here. Many do not even notice such a move. Not sure if Katherine+ will take it in that direction as she only have a few more years. I want Sean Cardinal O’Malley to come on over and become the PB lol.
From your keyboard to God’s monitor.
 
As with all predictions, one waits and sees. Perhaps the Parousia will intervene.

GKC
I’m not the PB’s biggest fan, but if she’s the one who triggers the Apocalypse, well… I think that might be a tiny bit of a let down! 😛
 
A question for fellow Anglicans:

Assuming (a) that we hope and work for the visible unity of Christ’s Church on Earth, and (b) that we are not crypto-Papists (to use an old and not inoffensive term!):

What would the Bishop of Rome’s role be in a reunified Latin (or indeed universal) Christendom? What is his future in a reformed and catholic Church of the West? How would Anglican ecclesiology need to change/develop/reform/be restored to accommodate this?

N.
 
If she does not fully institutionalize the change, in her tenure (and it is not merely a personal aggrandizement that is going on), the process will continue under her successor. This is a structural power grab that is part and parcel of the morphing of TEC, in many dimensions, of theology, liturgy , polity, that occasioned the St. Louis statement and the origin of the first Continuing Anglican movement. It is not going away. It is not retreating. It will be the face of the Episcopalians, hence forth. None can call their power to account. Temporally.

Says me.

GKC
And I agree. What you have stated here is the inevitable result of Luther and Henry VIII nullifying the authority of the pope for themselves and the millions who followed them over the cliff. That’s the tragedy I referred to.
 
Makes me grateful for Archbishops Justin and John over here…
🙂
As with all predictions, one waits and sees. Perhaps the Parousia will intervene.

GKC
The RCC has had its fair share of shaddy Popes in the past and they have emerged from it. I pray we do the same. 😉
I’d be grateful for a plenitude of orthodox Anglican bishops, myself. None in sight.

GKC
They are in sight…just hard to see right now.
 
I’m not the PB’s biggest fan, but if she’s the one who triggers the Apocalypse, well… I think that might be a tiny bit of a let down! 😛
Oh, I doubt she would trigger it. Just that perhaps it might intervene in the progress of TEC’s evolution, based on Someone Else’s time line.

GKC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top