Asking for greater penance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smber2c
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Smber2c

Guest
A friend of mine send me 12 CD’s of sermons by a Father Wolfe in Montana. I love listening to these sermons as I drive around, but most my friends and family thing this priest is way to “hard core” because he tells his parish many things are black and white.

I appreciate the conviction and challenge presented but worry about about getting scrupulous. Father Wolfe suggested to his congregation that they ask for greater penances after confession if they want greater graces.

I love the idea of more grace, infact I need it greatly. But I fear that a priest would think I’m doubting my forgiveness (which I certainly don’t).

I experienced a similiar hesitantcy when I read about “general confessions” when reading about St. Ignatius. I asked a priest if I could do one, and he said sure then was blown away as I started and he found out I was going to confess every sin that I ever remember comitting.
 
I think the humility and obedience involved in doing the penance the priest gives you is very valuable. To ask for more smacks of pride.

Betsy
 
I think the humility and obedience involved in doing the penance the priest gives you is very valuable. To ask for more smacks of pride.
I’m more wondering if anyone knows wether there is really greater graces given from greater penances. Fr. Wolfe explains that in the early church people frequently asked for greater penances because they understood that sufferings offered as penance are somehow greater offerings than those offered at any random moment.

I will obediently do whatever penance is handed to me, but there are many times that I’m told 3 Our Fathers, and would do more if it were asked of me. Some may call it prideful, fine but I don’t mean to be. Would someone consider fasting from all TV through lent as prideful if you first thought of only giving up your favorite program but then wanted to offer more?
 
I for one would advise against asking for more penances. The best thing we can do is always obey our confessors no matter what. This way we avoid scrupulosity and spiritual pride.

We can always do more penances on our own afterwards.

If I receive a penance that I feel is “too light” I do it anyway, then stop, and consider it fulfilled. Any further penances are done later so as to clearly tell myself that they are separate from the penance imposed at Confession.
 
I think this is dangerous b/c it may lead to the attitude that we earn our absolution. We don’t and can’t. It is a free gift by the grace of God. A harsh penance, a light penance, no penance are all just as good. Absolution is given by God throught the priest. Our penance plays no role in the forgiveness; only in remitting our temporal debt for our sins.

God Bless
 
You can always do more penance and offer it up for a particular thing in your life that you have need of grace for, or better still offer it up for the holy souls, or even just for the sake of it, because God is good.

This can be something you choose to do on your own, or maybe as part of a group like the Confraternity of Penitents if you feel like this is a really strong part of your calling in life. penitents.org/

Penance isn’t punishment for our sins, that punishment was paid by Christ on the cross. Penance is suffering to produce grace that overflows for the benefit of the whole Church. You don’t need to ask for greater penance for your own sins, but you can certainly do more.

The early Christian monks in England used to do public acts of penance for the conversion of souls. It’s not about being punished but about willingly entering into a sharing in the positive side of the sacrificial economy of God and humanity.
 
I think this is dangerous b/c it may lead to the attitude that we earn our absolution. We don’t and can’t. It is a free gift by the grace of God. A harsh penance, a light penance, no penance are all just as good. Absolution is given by God throught the priest. Our penance plays no role in the forgiveness; only in remitting our temporal debt for our sins.
I very much appreciate how clearly you stated this, and I agree fully. But, as you say penance does play a role in remitting our temporal debts and wouldn’t we want as much remitted before death as possible? I found the CD where I heard this and will try transcribing the pertinant parts to see if Fr. Wolfe’s words give any additional perspectives. (it’ll take a few minutes…and may be a longer post;) )
 
I fould the CD where Father Wolfe suggested the idea. It was a Homily on Purgatory. He explained that it is real, but it’s also a place of great suffering and not our goal, Heaven is the goal.

I’ll post an exact quote of the portion when Father Wolfe speaks on ‘greater penance’ here:

“ We want to even out the balance so we can reduce our [purgatory] time here in this life. Okay. Now before we go on let’s consider something we have already heard in light of this fact: St. Francis of Rome said, “On average it takes 7 years in purgatory to make expiation for each forgiven mortal sin.” Well now maybe you can see why the Catholics in the old days wanted like the worlds most mega penances when they went to confession. Why? So they got their penance done here and not here after.
That’s why a priest can tell you, you can ask for more penance in the confessional. He might fall over, but look all other things being the same the penance you get in confession; suppose that you got 10 Hail Mary’s in the confessional or decide to do 10 Hail Mary’s on your own. Because it’s attached to a sacrament it has way more value for you. So, if you can ask for more, I mean, some priests will be happy to give you more – they’ll ask you if that’s enough. It’s not picking on you it’s for your own good. Penance is good, we want to do it. Now, okay.
So, St. Thomas of Villanova in fact urges confessors to give their penitents optional penances. An optional penance is something they don’t have to do, but if they do, do it, it gets them out of purgatory time, beside the fact they are growing in holiness. And this is a good thing, and because it’s optional they’re not bound under the pain of sin, in that way, if they don’t get it done they’re safe. You know cause we have to do our penances if they’re bound, but if they’re optional we don’t. ”
 
I trust that the priest is giving the penance he is inspired to give me.

If you want extra graces, offer little sacrifices each day. No soda, skip the candy bar you planned to buy at lunch, secret acts of charity towards others etc. —KCT
 
I was under the impression (may be wrong) that if we do the penance the priest gives, that is sufficient to remit our temporal punishment.

There is a really good little leaflet called How to Avoid Purgatory by Fr Paul O’Sullivan O.P. which a friend lent me which explains a lot more detail about how powerful penitential indulgences are in remitting temporal punishment.

You can also gain a plenary indulgence for all kinds of acts, if you are free of attachment to sin.

Ironically, however, here the words of the Lord “he who wants to keep his life will lose it, but he who loses his life for My sake will keep it to eternal life” seem to hold particularly true. If you are always striving to build up a store of indulgences to save yourself from Purgatory, you will lead yourself into selfishness and scrupulosity, and your penance won’t help you grow in trust, because you’re trying to do it all for yourself. If you offer up your penances for the holy souls in Purgatory, they will surely not neglect to pray for you when they reach Heaven, and you will earn a richer reward by helping others than by building up treasure for yourself.
 
I very much appreciate how clearly you stated this, and I agree fully. But, as you say penance does play a role in remitting our temporal debts and wouldn’t we want as much remitted before death as possible? I found the CD where I heard this and will try transcribing the pertinant parts to see if Fr. Wolfe’s words give any additional perspectives. (it’ll take a few minutes…and may be a longer post;) )
I agree - we should all have a deeply penitential attitude. That doesn’t automatically translate to asking your priest for more penance in the confessional!

I’d like to know where this Father Wolfe gets his idea that penances attached to Confession have greater value. Never heard anything of the kind before, as far as I’ve ever been told penance is penance. And I’d imagine if you choose it on your own, if anything it would have more meaning than something someone else orders you to do. You’d do it more wholeheartedly for sure.

If you want to do more prayer or almsgiving, fine, do it on your own. You’re presumably an adult and don’t need anyone’s permission. Certainly these things are no-one’s business but yours unless you have responsibilities to others that may be affected - if your almsgiving inhibits your ability to support your children for example.

With one proviso - you must seek advice if you’re going to do anything by way of physical penance. This, if not done carefully and under the close supervision of a spiritual director, can harm you both spiritually (being a source of pride) and physically, so you need to approach them with care.
 
As I read what’s been stated, I’m a bit uncomfortable with the certainty that some speak of with regards to the nature and rules that govern Purgatory. In reality, we simply do not know for sure, and the good father’s suggestion seems a bit formulaic. For example, seven years for each forgiven mortal sin? Are we not outside of time once we die and move into eternity? Is one truly conducting a sincere act of repentance if the set outcome of asking for extra penance is a reduction of time in Purgatory? Instead of dying to self, it seem like a most self-serving act.

Penance is a virtue because sin offends God. To perform such acts of penance for any other reason, including personal gain, IMHO, detracts from the virtue.
 
I’d like to know where this Father Wolfe gets his idea that penances attached to Confession have greater value. Never heard anything of the kind before, as far as I’ve ever been told penance is penance. And I’d imagine if you choose it on your own, if anything it would have more meaning than something someone else orders you to do. You’d do it more wholeheartedly for sure.
I’m certainly no theologian, so I’m not sure to the claim that penance attached to Confession having greater value; but at the moment it seems correct because 1. the highest authority I’ve talked to on the issue says so and 2. if our proximity to God and state of grace during an action doesn’t matter when why do we spend time in adoration and why have several priest told me that praying after the reception of the Eucharist is the most sacred of prayers we can offer?

Additionally, I don’t expect that penance done by ones own choosing will have more meaning because there isn’t any obedience (not that the self choosen penance is bad, it isn’t at all, but one imposed by another - especially one acting as Christ - would take greater virtue)

This is where people may say I’m trying to get both ends for myself, but I’ll see if this makes sense:

First one gets a penance. They accept that penance and decide to do that penance.
Second they ask the priest before leaving if he would be comfortable giving a more legnthy or involved penance in addition.
Third, the priest responds by agreeing or saying no - and the person accepts either decision.
 
I beilieve that the greatest penance one may offer is the following of these words: " and I firmly resolve with the help of thy grace to sin no more." What greater penance and grace filled motive than to rebuke the next temptation we fall into and turn it into a chance to glorify God?? Think about it; would God prefer you to walk around your whole life with sackcloth and ashes and continue in your sins or refuse temptation and offer it up?? Ten more Hail Mary’s are always good but ten less sins are better…God Bless…teachccd 🙂
 
As I read what’s been stated, I’m a bit uncomfortable with the certainty that some speak of with regards to the nature and rules that govern Purgatory. In reality, we simply do not know for sure, and the good father’s suggestion seems a bit formulaic. For example, seven years for each forgiven mortal sin? Are we not outside of time once we die and move into eternity?
I certainly agree that we don’t know that Purgatory has time and that if it does we don’t know how it flows. I also understand that when there are 40 day indulgences or 6 month indulgences - these do not mean we get 40 days or 6 months out of purgatory. It means (as far as I understand it) we get as much “time” of purgatory as 40 days or 6 months of penance would afford us.

(note that “time” is in quotes because again we don’t know, this could just mean it affects the magnitude of instantanious event)

However, the only person to claim a certian time here was my quoting St. Francis of Rome. Sure maybe he’s wrong, but I see no reason to be sure of it. Another Saint, St. Robert Bellarmine, doctor of the church said, “There’s no doubt that the pains in purgatroy are not limited to 10 or 20 years and they last in some cases entire centuries.” ← Doctor of the Church
Is one truly conducting a sincere act of repentance if the set outcome of asking for extra penance is a reduction of time in Purgatory? Instead of dying to self, it seem like a most self-serving act.
Penance is a virtue because sin offends God. To perform such acts of penance for any other reason, including personal gain, IMHO, detracts from the virtue.
Is one truly seeking to conform to God’s will in life, if they are just trying to do enough to make the last cut and slip into the lowest batch in purgatory?
We weren’t made for purgatory, we were made for heaven. Every single soul in purgarory wants to be in Heaven, but they all also realize that they must be perfected before they may enter. But, would it be true that they can never be perfected and thus leave purgatory because they all want to “personal gain” of being with God? No, I’m sure we all see that is foolish.

If it is true that one can ask for greater penance and thru it remit time in purgatory…must we assume they are doing it because they don’t want to suffer there? And if so, what is the suffering there anyway?
St. Thomas explains there are 2 pains in purgatory:
1st At the delay of the Beatific vision (but knowing full well it’s magnitude)
2nd A cleaning fire that purges our souls of our last attachments to sin.

Seeing what the pain is in purgatory shows why we shouldn’t want the pains. To suffer the first pain without need is idiotic - once pain 2 is paid, pain 1 is over cause we’re in. In asking for the 2nd pain now on Earth, we can offer now for our sin and have less of that suffering and of the first once we die.

I believe it was St. Bonaventure and several others who said, ‘The least pain in purgatory is greater than the largest pain on Earth.’

If so, why plan on going there? We do have the ability to skip purgatory if we are willing.

Matthew 5:26 “truly, I say at you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.”
Luke 12:59 “I tell you, you will never get out till you have paid the very last copper”

A second Fr. Wolfism, “I’m going to make a parenthetical comment. God sends un everything we need to die and go straight to Heaven. Exactly the amount of suffering we need to make amends for everything. Evactly the amount of suffering we need to grow in virtute, and if we don’t that’s our own fault. That’s the point of the cross, that’s why we have crosses in our lives, so we’ll become saints.”
 
I’m certainly no theologian, so I’m not sure to the claim that penance attached to Confession having greater value; but at the moment it seems correct because 1. the highest authority I’ve talked to on the issue says so and 2. if our proximity to God and state of grace during an action doesn’t matter when why do we spend time in adoration and why have several priest told me that praying after the reception of the Eucharist is the most sacred of prayers we can offer?

Additionally, I don’t expect that penance done by ones own choosing will have more meaning because there isn’t any obedience (not that the self choosen penance is bad, it isn’t at all, but one imposed by another - especially one acting as Christ - would take greater virtue)

This is where people may say I’m trying to get both ends for myself, but I’ll see if this makes sense:

First one gets a penance. They accept that penance and decide to do that penance.
Second they ask the priest before leaving if he would be comfortable giving a more legnthy or involved penance in addition.
Third, the priest responds by agreeing or saying no - and the person accepts either decision.
Not true - if you choose your own penance you only know what is most difficult, for example, for you to do. Let’s say you know your biggest problem is with your temper. And you alone know which person annoys you the most.

Doesn’t take a genius to work out that it would be a fantastic penance to make a decision to be nice to that person for a whole week or whatever. Do you think most priests would come up with something like that? Probably not.
 
Not true - if you choose your own penance you only know what is most difficult, for example, for you to do. Let’s say you know your biggest problem is with your temper. And you alone know which person annoys you the most.

Doesn’t take a genius to work out that it would be a fantastic penance to make a decision to be nice to that person for a whole week or whatever. Do you think most priests would come up with something like that? Probably not.
Kinda brings you back to my post…Oh well,🤷
 
I think the humility and obedience involved in doing the penance the priest gives you is very valuable. To ask for more smacks of pride.

Betsy
I agree. There are great graces associated with the virtue of obedience.
 
A friend of mine send me 12 CD’s of sermons by a Father Wolfe in Montana. I love listening to these sermons as I drive around, but most my friends and family thing this priest is way to “hard core” because he tells his parish many things are black and white.

I appreciate the conviction and challenge presented but worry about about getting scrupulous. Father Wolfe suggested to his congregation that they ask for greater penances after confession if they want greater graces.

I love the idea of more grace, infact I need it greatly. But I fear that a priest would think I’m doubting my forgiveness (which I certainly don’t).

I experienced a similiar hesitantcy when I read about “general confessions” when reading about St. Ignatius. I asked a priest if I could do one, and he said sure then was blown away as I started and he found out I was going to confess every sin that I ever remember comitting.
I think if you have a parish priest like this one and can work with him where you’re both on the same page, it would be fine. In many parishes, I can see priests having vapors!

However, you can always do penance. You don’t need to ask for it. You can choose it (same thing) and offer it for all of us sinners! I’ll do the same 👍

I wouldn’t give up the concept you’ve learned, though…we have it directly from Fatima - “penance! penance! penance!”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top