Assembly Line Communion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jotobo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hello,

So I am very new to the church and I guess technically not yet a member, but, I am soaking anything and everything up I can get my hands on. I have found myself becoming very drawn to the TLM (with a little help from this very forum). But on to my point…

The Mass I attend would be a NO Mass. When Communion comes people go up, get the Body (in the hand), and walk away chewing on it (about 85% skip the Blood). This happens in almost rapid fashion. I thought nothing of it for the most part as I am just learning and it was all I had ever seen.

I have been on Youtube.com looking at videos of TLM and FSSP Masses as there is only one church around that I know of that offers the TLM (I can not yet go as I have RCIA obligations). I was watching an FSSP Mass and I was so blown away when I saw how they did Communion. The preparation was so detailed and so reverant. The people came up and on their knees took the Body (on the tongue) and did the Sign of the Cross and then remained in a kneel position for a few moments (obviously reflecting and respecting what they have just taken part in).

So what gives with the other churches I have attended? I have only been to three and it was all the assembly line style of recieving the Eucharist. Does anyone know the progression or the inner workings of how or why this occurs?

When I take my first Communion on Easter Vigil I fully intend on maximizing my reverance to Christ and I dont want to be pushed aside or asked to move along while doing it.
Malleus: There is a saying - a Picture is worth a Thousand words. When one attends a TLM for , say a month and then One attends an OF for the same amount of time - and then by observation can that person then form an opinion? Of course they can. There is wisdom in your observations. And it is because of what you are seeing - that you are drawn to the TLM. Many of us are. And if you take the time to understand this rite fully - it only gets better.

Pax
 
CHEWING is not okay.

I was taught before the VII never, under any circumstances, to ever chew the Sacred Host.
 
CHEWING is not okay.

I was taught before the VII never, under any circumstances, to ever chew the Sacred Host.
Seems to me that the hosts were thinner pre-V2 and they would dissolve on the tongue. The hosts today are thicker. I would not want someone choking on a host due to being afraid to chew it.
 
Jon

What a load of nonsense.

I’m well aware of the thickness of hosts in churches. No one yet has “choked” on one (And if they did, what a way to go!). Just yesterday, I received one of those Hosts. I never chew the Host and it is not necessary. The excuses you people make…
 
I cannot believe we are discussing how to absorb the Eucharist, this is utter nonsense, seriously, absolutely childish. I’m appalled the thread has gone to this level, grow up people, this is just stupid…
 
I cannot believe we are discussing how to absorb the Eucharist, this is utter nonsense, seriously, absolutely childish. I’m appalled the thread has gone to this level, grow up people, this is just stupid…
It was in the OP… quote " When Communion comes people go up, get the Body (in the hand), and walk away chewing on it " unquote. So your saying that the thread deteriorated before it even got off the ground? I think it deserved a response.
 
It was in the OP… quote " When Communion comes people go up, get the Body (in the hand), and walk away chewing on it " unquote. So your saying that the thread deteriorated before it even got off the ground? I think it deserved a response.
Can you imagine it, the very first time, Jesus and the apostles sitting down, bickering among each other as to how the bread and wine should be shared?? Honestly, the spirit of this one is entirely lost with this debate.
 
What is needed is a complete spiritual overhaul, this is not a problem of ritual as much as a general mindset.

The other points were excellent.

So if it is the Faith that changes us, perhaps we had better look back further than the modern canons (the one hour Eucharistic Fast, for example). It starts with us, not settling for the minimums the modern church expects but striving at the maximums the earlier church expected, and not just at Mass, but in every aspect.

Nearly twenty years ago I began to take to a more rigorous fast at Lent and Advent, eschewing meats, fish and rich delights entirely every day, reducing my intake of almost everything else. It puzzled the hell out of my family, but I had become aware it was the historically traditional Catholic fast (a real fast, not abstinence from some little pleasure) and I insisted. This discipline went back further than my mother (born in 1929, memory eternal!) could recall, so she objected too. I ramped up my spiritual reading and prayer life as well. Fellow Catholics all around me reacted as though I had been knocked a bit off-center.

It seems to me there is probably no going back to the truly traditional Latin church as it really was, even for most self described Traditionalists. I think what we have today is a ‘cinematic’ ritual version of the Faith everyone admires so very much, a romantic idealistic recreation that lasts about an hour, after which everything goes back to ‘normal’. The things AmbroseSJ listed in his post resonated with me, they are 'round-the-clock life changing, the church will not bring them back so one has to do it on one’s own.
That is a truly spot-on post.

As I return to the Faith and strive to become half of what I was before I left, I look back on those old rigors and I see in them potent sources of faith-building. I pray I can better make use of Tradition and live up to the spirituality our forebears achieved.

It’s interesting to note how protestants are shocked at how Spartan even modern Catholic fasts are (in their eyes), that merely not eating fish on Friday or fasting only on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday are seen as quasi-ascetic. That just happened to pop out in my mind; in a sense, those of us who are concerned with the looser standards of the modern Church culture can at least thank God things haven’t gotten that bad (yet) where the slightest self-denial is regarded aghast instead of seen as one of many paths towards self-correction and growth in holiness.
 
Can you imagine it, the very first time, Jesus and the apostles sitting down, bickering among each other as to how the bread and wine should be shared?? Honestly, the spirit of this one is entirely lost with this debate.
Lol…Im just suprised how my observation and questions seem to have been twisted everyway imaginable.

Clearly one must chew.

Wow, just wow…

Imagine if we all just sat back and never questioned any form of progression. I guess I am wrong somehow to question. I mean how dare I? I was under the impression that being in RCIA was a period where one was to investigate, question, observe…
 
Lol…Im just suprised how my observation and questions seem to have been twisted everyway imaginable.

Clearly one must chew.

Wow, just wow…

Imagine if we all just sat back and never questioned any form of progression. I guess I am wrong somehow to question. I mean how dare I? I was under the impression that being in RCIA was a period where one was to investigate, question, observe…
Always keep questing, in or out of Rcia, doesn’t matter, the more you know “why” along the faith, the better, for you never know when someone from the outside may question you, and not knowing is going to be a poor witness.
 
Can you imagine it, the very first time, Jesus and the apostles sitting down, bickering among each other as to how the bread and wine should be shared?? Honestly, the spirit of this one is entirely lost with this debate.
If our communion experience can even be a tenth as somber and serious…
 
What a load of nonsense.
Lol…Im just suprised how my observation and questions seem to have been twisted everyway imaginable.
I second that 😦

It seems that you cannot even make reasonable observations on here without getting flamed. It is getting to the point where it is not worth posting anymore.
 
I second that 😦

It seems that you cannot even make reasonable observations on here without getting flamed. It is getting to the point where it is not worth posting anymore.
I agree In the course of this thread I’ve been accused of being a modernist which I’m not (whether he/she didn’t quite mean it in that way or not), and I think I was accused of calling the OP judgemental. OP wanted to understand the process by judging it; NOT the people.

Oh well, we get blasted for mentioning how folks “absorb the Eucharist” when it was a point made by the original OP. And deserved a response. It’s a question that’s been ask before on ‘Ask the Apologist’ and other places as well I’m sure and they didn’t blast them for asking it, but gave a very reasonable and charitable answer.

It’s just to hot for me in here…and I don’t see why everyone got so crazy in the first place!!

Later folks.

Peace
 
Seeing this thread deteriorate here, don’t be alarmed when the moderator locks the thread.

Remember folks what Paul talks about with boasting, and how it’s utterly counterproductive, how he interjects with them, telling them that if they want to boast, let them compare themselves to him, how they all fall short in his example if they go down that route.👍

With my relatives, I try to convey this same thing, none of them go to church, and they started to take offense with me, seeing how hard core I am into this, thinking I was thinking of a comparison, when clearly I tell them, it’s not about that at all, simply get a prayer life started and going, we all area along different spiritual levels, stronger in some areas, weaker in other, and not to make comparisons.🙂 We have too many that think well, you must be doing it this way or it’s wrong, others saying it doesn’t matter, it’s all good, yet as an earlier poster stated, we do not know what’s in the heart of the individual after receiving communion, so cannot make any assumptions.👍

I temper this with knowing, it’s often necessary to go with the flow of sorts, where how it’s received, even though we all have options within it for individual acceptance, the bottom line is,*** “we receive our Lord”, ***:amen:and this is what counts so much more then any formality that’s in place, and trust me, how we accept it now will itself change yet again, and again, and again, fluctuating between the different manners upon reception of it all. Personally, I’d like to see other ways of doing it as well, such as it would be cool to have a special mass where we receive the body and blood in the same exact manner as Jesus did with the apostles, passing the cup and the bread, hand to hand, sitting at the table, in the same manner as the original offering., but I’m sure, that’s for a future date some time. I agree, this would be cool!!🙂
The only quam I have with others receiving it, and I’m sure all will agree with me, are those that "dine and dash", leaving mass before it’s ended after receiving communion, those individuals, unless they have some emergency, or their schedules absolutely dictate, not being able to stick around, are the ones in error.👍
:amen:

Very well said! Thank you!:clapping:
 
CHEWING is not okay.

I was taught before the VII never, under any circumstances, to ever chew the Sacred Host.
Well, there actually is nothing wrong with it. It was a pious misconception that a lot of people were taught, but there were never any rules against it whatsover.
 
Yes, I am frustrated about the “dine and dash” Catholics who can’t wait to get communion then run out, clearly focused on their personal desires instead of taking a few simple moments out to pray and grow close to the Lord after partaking of the Eucharist. Barring those who might have to rush out for genuine emergencies, I was always saddened by the dine-and-dashers; how could you just run out of Church without so much as pausing? I’d certainly consider that to be far worse than chewing the Host as opposed to letting it dissolve on one’s tongue.

How else would one consume the Host, anyway? You can’t swallow them whole; I’ve never had a modern Host that was thin enough to dissolve. It’s not a sacramental breath strip.
 
Lycorth, since I made my First Holy Communion, I’ve never chewed the Holy Eucharist. So for almost fifty years I’ve been allowing the Host to dissolve or, in the case of thicker ones from new masses, breaking the Host with my tongue and then swallowing the Holy Eucharist. It can be done. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Try it.
 
Well, there actually is nothing wrong with it. It was a pious misconception that a lot of people were taught, but there were never any rules against it whatsover.
Someone pointed out on another thread that the word Jesus used was the usual one for consuming meat, bread etc. and could even be translated as ‘gnaw’.

In other words, he said ‘Take and EAT’, not ‘Take and SUCK’.

I don’t understand the good Sisters being so emphatic about not chewing, unless it was to make sure the children knew they were receiving something special, or to avoid them chewing with their mouth open and so being irreverent.

Tell me, they surely didn’t imply that Jesus could be hurt if the Host was bitten? Please tell me they didn’t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top