Assisting singles who are called to marriage is actually a practical way of addressing some of the moral issues that the Church is dealing with

  • Thread starter Thread starter XenaFan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Some thoughts:
  1. “It would also help for the Church to consider that many single Catholics can no longer be categorized as “young” adults. It may be tempting to continue to push the age limit of the young adult ministry further and further back, thus using the young adult model as a kind of catch-all. In the end, though, this really is not fair to those Catholics who actually are young as well as to those who are shut out as a result of no longer meeting the age requirement.”
That sounds sensible.
  1. “Sometimes it seems as if many of the people marrying young in the Church are the folks who are living together, using contraception, etc., while those who follow the Church’s teachings are unable to establish a family.”
???
 
“Sometimes it seems as if many of the people marrying young in the Church are the folks who are living together, using contraception, etc., while those who follow the Church’s teachings are unable to establish a family.”

???
I once heard a story of a woman who converted to the Catholic faith in her late 20’s. She was unchurched before that. She told some Catholic friends, half joking, that it was so much harder to get a date now that she was Catholic. The reason? Before becoming Catholic she had “no standards”. In fact, she had been living with her boyfriend and had a baby with him before learning about the Catholic faith. After accepting all of the Church’s teachings, she found out how small the dating pool is of others who are willing to go along with those standards.

Among my circle of friends and family who are Catholic, most of the people who married young were those who disagreed with Church teaching, especially where birth control was concerned, sometimes with premarital sex as well. The Catholics I know who agree with Church teaching in these and other areas usually can’t find someone to marry until they’re middle age. Some are older than that and still can’t find anyone. Maybe the author was referring to situations like that.
 
I once heard a story of a woman who converted to the Catholic faith in her late 20’s. She was unchurched before that. She told some Catholic friends, half joking, that it was so much harder to get a date now that she was Catholic. The reason? Before becoming Catholic she had “no standards”. In fact, she had been living with her boyfriend and had a baby with him before learning about the Catholic faith. After accepting all of the Church’s teachings, she found out how small the dating pool is of others who are willing to go along with those standards.

Among my circle of friends and family who are Catholic, most of the people who married young were those who disagreed with Church teaching, especially where birth control was concerned, sometimes with premarital sex as well. The Catholics I know who agree with Church teaching in these and other areas usually can’t find someone to marry until they’re middle age. Some are older than that and still can’t find anyone. Maybe the author was referring to situations like that.
I think high standards are a big part of the reason for older single Catholics. I understand not compromising your faith but many of the chronically single that I see complain here are holding out for someone who simply doesn’t exist.
 
I think high standards are a big part of the reason for older single Catholics. I understand not compromising your faith but many of the chronically single that I see complain here are holding out for someone who simply doesn’t exist.
Or if the person did exist, they wouldn’t like them. You can check all the boxes, but not have any chemistry whatsoever.
 
Or if the person did exist, they wouldn’t like them. You can check all the boxes, but not have any chemistry whatsoever.
Right that’s what I meant. There are plenty of fair young maidens just not many who want chubby, entitled, middle-aged men.
 
Right that’s what I meant. There are plenty of fair young maidens just not many who want chubby, entitled, middle-aged men.
That’s a good point, but not what I meant. My pronouns got confusing!

What I meant is that A can have all of the on-paper qualities that B is looking for, but B might still not actually like A.
 
It’s also beneficial for the church because they’ll likely get more seminarians from Catholic families than from converts.
 
It’s also beneficial for the church because they’ll likely get more seminarians from Catholic families than from converts.
Well said. I personally think we’re going to have fewer priests in the future because the marriage rate continues to go down every year. It’s odd that Church officials aren’t concerned about the high number of single Catholics for that reason.
 
It’s also beneficial for the church because they’ll likely get more seminarians from Catholic families than from converts.
Lay people are of more benefit to the church than seminarians.
 
It’s also beneficial for the church because they’ll likely get more seminarians from Catholic families than from converts.
I think it was on this forum that I heard of a theory that the current “priesthood crisis” or “vocation crisis” was actually a marriage crisis. Because we have had so many unmarried Catholic of so long, we haven’t had enough families for our priests to be born into.
 
Our society is very ill and selfish when it comes to sexuality.

Let’s all use birth control and live out our lives until we are 35 THEN decide to have a child or two IF we decide. Then let’s get back on the pills.

It’s a disgusting a poisonous way to live. Sadly Catholics who follow their faith or those open to the Churches wisdom in this area often won’t find someone until they have lived this hollow lifestyle until middle age and are in a hurry to beat mother nature.

Like all sins thou there is a price to be paid somewhere.
 
I think it was on this forum that I heard of a theory that the current “priesthood crisis” or “vocation crisis” was actually a marriage crisis. Because we have had so many unmarried Catholic of so long, we haven’t had enough families for our priests to be born into.
I was watching EWTN’s Life on the Rock a while back. A gal named Emily Stimpson was explaining this same connection. I think the phrase she used was, “If devout Catholics don’t start marrying and having children, we’re going to have a vocations shortage to the priesthood, the likes of which we have never seen before.”

Scary thought! Unfortunately it’s very true.
 
I was watching EWTN’s Life on the Rock a while back. A gal named Emily Stimpson was explaining this same connection. I think the phrase she used was, “If devout Catholics don’t start marrying and having children, we’re going to have a vocations shortage to the priesthood, the likes of which we have never seen before.”

Scary thought! Unfortunately it’s very true.
I think this is true. The areas and parishes from which I see the most vocations arising are those areas with strong families, often large families, belonging to parishes where the faith is strong. I’m convinced that the true vocation crisis is the marriage vocation crisis.

The decline of families leads to a decline in vocations, as well as, on the secular front, a weak economy, an unsustainable social security system, and a society satisfied with mediocrity and low expectations.
 
The main reason why singles are not married today is because of porn addiction and birth control being so common in Our culture

I am a single 27 year old Catholic man who has no chance of ever marrying because of being disabled.
 
“Sometimes it seems as if many of the people marrying young in the Church are the folks who are living together, using contraception, etc., while those who follow the Church’s teachings are unable to establish a family.”
There is a lot of truth to this. Couples who are cohabiting often end up marrying, and marrying younger than those who are following Christian teaching against extramarital sex. The end result is that the chaste end up unmarried or married later in life, while the unchaste are the ones getting married. I can’t say for sure without statistics; but this is my personal observation.
 
There is a lot of truth to this. Couples who are cohabiting often end up marrying, and marrying younger than those who are following Christian teaching against extramarital sex. The end result is that the chaste end up unmarried or married later in life, while the unchaste are the ones getting married. I can’t say for sure without statistics; but this is my personal observation.
I have seen this in my community. Those who do end up getting married young are the ones not having children because they are contracepting. If a traditionally minded person manages to find love and get married, which is EXTREMELY rare, they often can’t have the big families they wanted to because they spent 15-25 years of their life looking for love. By the time they found it, they had few fertile years left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top