Assisting singles who are called to marriage is actually a practical way of addressing some of the moral issues that the Church is dealing with

  • Thread starter Thread starter XenaFan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Eh…I don’t think it’s a question of maturity so much as it is wisdom. There are lots of reasons for parish leaders to stay out of the romantic lives of the flock. It’s just going to create tension, anger, resentment, assigning blame for loneliness/relationships not working out, gossip, drama, and all of these other negative things that don’t belong in church.
But we should as a society use government to recognize/subsidize it? :ehh:
 
Right that’s what I meant. There are plenty of fair young maidens just not many who want chubby, entitled, middle-aged men.
As a forty-something female, I personally wouldn’t mind a chubby middle-aged man. Looks fade with age anyway. I’m simply looking for someone who shares my faith, can marry in the Church, won’t ask me to compromise on Catholic morality, and is reasonably compatible with my personality. You’re right though about the entitlement attitude- that part would have to go.
 
As a forty-something female, I personally wouldn’t mind a chubby middle-aged man. Looks fade with age anyway. I’m simply looking for someone who shares my faith, can marry in the Church, won’t ask me to compromise on Catholic morality, and is reasonably compatible with my personality. You’re right though about the entitlement attitude- that part would have to go.
👍 I think something a lot of people don’t factor in as well is the fact that once you hit your mid-30s and are holding down a full time job and striving out of necessity, to make a go of your career (because nobody else is going to help) then the means and opportunity to find a good man diminish along with one’s confidence. At the same time, there is still society’s perception that a lady over about 35 who is educated and can hold down a good job must be single because she is ‘selfish’ and ‘career-focussed’.

So ironic, when as good Catholic girls, we came home from school and did our homework and didn’t mess around with boys 😛 The same qualities of working hard, using one’s God given gifts and keeping sex for within marriage seem to embarass people who have conveniently dropped them! I still think a lot of people who are Catholics turn a blind eye, or are in denial about the lot of the single, practicing Catholic because they ‘bent’ the rules to get to their ‘happily ever after’ 😉

I still can’t believe my luck that I got married for the first time aged 42 - apparently I had more chance of being hit by a meteor 😃
 
I think we all have to come to the realization and acceptance that the Church simply isn’t set up to help singles who want to marry get married. Avenues for young people to get involved in the Church drops off after high school, and unless a college has a Newman Center Catholics know about, they’re on their own.

I would propose that instead of waiting for the Church to come up with some approved, institutionalized-led method of getting singles married, we as laypeople should take that responsibility upon ourselves. We should be having a hand in helping singles get introduced in safe, charitable and chaste activities where people can get to know each other in low pressure environments.

The problem is, the individual parishes need to be open to these ideas.
 
I think we all have to come to the realization and acceptance that the Church simply isn’t set up to help singles who want to marry get married. Avenues for young people to get involved in the Church drops off after high school, and unless a college has a Newman Center Catholics know about, they’re on their own.

I would propose that instead of waiting for the Church to come up with some approved, institutionalized-led method of getting singles married, we as laypeople should take that responsibility upon ourselves. We should be having a hand in helping singles get introduced in safe, charitable and chaste activities where people can get to know each other in low pressure environments.

The problem is, the individual parishes need to be open to these ideas.
Yes.

And I would encourage parents of young adults to be especially active in facilitating socials.
 
👍 I think something a lot of people don’t factor in as well is the fact that once you hit your mid-30s and are holding down a full time job and striving out of necessity, to make a go of your career (because nobody else is going to help) then the means and opportunity to find a good man diminish along with one’s confidence. At the same time, there is still society’s perception that a lady over about 35 who is educated and can hold down a good job must be single because she is ‘selfish’ and ‘career-focussed’.
Or, once one has been single that long (men too), they find there are certain freedoms of singlehood that are difficult to give up to maintain a relationship.
 
foryourmarriage.org/cardinal-dolan-sees-new-urgency-around-marriage/

I thought of this article as I’ve read through the various replies in this thread. I think Cardinal Dolan’s idea of praying for more marriage vocations at Mass is a good one. I also think he’s on to something when he talks about the connection between the vocation to marriage and vocations to the priesthood and religious life. When the former declines over many years, so does the latter.

From what I’ve heard, Bishop Olmsted of Phoenix has also expressed concern about the fact that the marriage rate among Catholics in the U.S. is at an all time low. He’s right too. A Pew Research Center study in May of 2015 shows that single Catholics now make up 48% of the Catholic Church in the United States.
 
foryourmarriage.org/cardinal-dolan-sees-new-urgency-around-marriage/

I thought of this article as I’ve read through the various replies in this thread. I think Cardinal Dolan’s idea of praying for more marriage vocations at Mass is a good one. I also think he’s on to something when he talks about the connection between the vocation to marriage and vocations to the priesthood and religious life. When the former declines over many years, so does the latter.

From what I’ve heard, Bishop Olmsted of Phoenix has also expressed concern about the fact that the marriage rate among Catholics in the U.S. is at an all time low. He’s right too. A Pew Research Center study in May of 2015 shows that single Catholics now make up 48% of the Catholic Church in the United States.
Now among single Catholics, which percent are divorced and which percent are never married. I’m thinking it’s more of the former than the latter.
 
Now among single Catholics, which percent are divorced and which percent are never married. I’m thinking it’s more of the former than the latter.
According to that same Pew Research study, 14% of Catholics in the U.S. are divorced. I believe it also said 8% of U.S. Catholics were cohabitating.
 
According to that same Pew Research study, 14% of Catholics in the U.S. are divorced. I believe it also said 8% of U.S. Catholics were cohabitating.
Those seem like awfully low numbers. Only 8% are cohabiting? You’re hard-pressed to come across a mainstream, practicing engaged couple who aren’t living together.
 
I think it is very, very difficult for the married folk to see how a lot of singles may find it challenging to meet like-minded singles much less like-minded singles who they are attracted to. After all of the married folks managed to get married than it should not be a big deal for the rest. Right?
I never, ever thought this way about unmarried people.

I remember being a young, single believing Christian (thought not Catholic) and finding out how difficult it was to come across men who actually practiced Christianity. It’s also more than just attraction. I come from a very strict, traditional, and overinvolved family (cultural) where a lot of men would have gone running for the hills.

There are probably a lot more young people who come from families like mine who are finding it difficult to meet someone who will want to marry them, and the family. Sometimes families have a way of putting a huge damper on attraction.
 
I think we all have to come to the realization and acceptance that the Church simply isn’t set up to help singles who want to marry get married. Avenues for young people to get involved in the Church drops off after high school, and unless a college has a Newman Center Catholics know about, they’re on their own.

I would propose that instead of waiting for the Church to come up with some approved, institutionalized-led method of getting singles married, we as laypeople should take that responsibility upon ourselves. We should be having a hand in helping singles get introduced in safe, charitable and chaste activities where people can get to know each other in low pressure environments.

The problem is, the individual parishes need to be open to these ideas.
Now that we have made every single group for unmarried people about getting them married we obviously need to open more groups for getting them married, right? Why does everyone seem opposed to the concept of promoting lay celibacy? After all the Church teaches celibacy is a greater good than marriage and that disagreement is anathema (i.e. heresy).
Or, once one has been single that long (men too), they find there are certain freedoms of singlehood that are difficult to give up to maintain a relationship.
Such as?
 
Now that we have made every single group for unmarried people about getting them married we obviously need to open more groups for getting them married, right? Why does everyone seem opposed to the concept of promoting lay celibacy? After all the Church teaches celibacy is a greater good than marriage and that disagreement is anathema (i.e. heresy).

Such as?
I’m sorry but your statement is confusing. Where did I, or anyone else, state they’re against promoting the clergy or religious life? Why would there need to be more groups about getting single people married when the singles groups could obviously serve that same purpose, too?

Might I point out there are far more people who are interested in getting married, have the strong desire to do so, and would like help with it? Are you suggesting we try to get these people to change their minds? That’s what discerning your vocation is about. If those who’ve determined they want married life why shouldn’t there be a way to assist them?
 
Now that we have made every single group for unmarried people about getting them married we obviously need to open more groups for getting them married, right? Why does everyone seem opposed to the concept of promoting lay celibacy? After all the Church teaches celibacy is a greater good than marriage and that disagreement is anathema (i.e. heresy).

Such as?
Supporting singles in being single might ultimately lead to healthier, holier marriages. If the Church as a culture focuses on matchmaking to “help” singles it’s sending the wrong message.

Joie de Vivre, do you think the Church sees being single as a vocation or a state in life? Or both?
 
Supporting singles in being single might ultimately lead to healthier, holier marriages. If the Church as a culture focuses on matchmaking to “help” singles it’s sending the wrong message.

Joie de Vivre, do you think the Church sees being single as a vocation or a state in life? Or both?
Singlehood has been a vocation of recent. Historically it wasn’t good to be single, especially women, because you had married life or you could go into religious life.

What I’ve witnessed is when we start supporting single people in being single, they’re the same ones who end up complaining later on about how they dislike being single, and where have all the good ones gone. I’d rather see a layculture where there is a space for single people, but matchmaking is a part of that culture. In fact, it doesn’t even have to be matchmaking. It could be activities allowing those who are interested in finding a spouse to actually meet people they’re interested in.
 
Singlehood has been a vocation of recent. Historically it wasn’t good to be single, especially women, because you had married life or you could go into religious life.

What I’ve witnessed is when we start supporting single people in being single, they’re the same ones who end up complaining later on about how they dislike being single, and where have all the good ones gone. I’d rather see a layculture where there is a space for single people, but matchmaking is a part of that culture. In fact, it doesn’t even have to be matchmaking. It could be activities allowing those who are interested in finding a spouse to actually meet people they’re interested in.
I believe that that being single is a valid state but I haven’t seen anything that in which the Church says it’s a capital-V vocation. I wanted to know I Joie de Vivre knew sources different from those that others have shared that have failed to convince me that it is.
 
Singlehood has been a vocation of recent. Historically it wasn’t good to be single, especially women, because you had married life or you could go into religious life.

What I’ve witnessed is when we start supporting single people in being single, they’re the same ones who end up complaining later on about how they dislike being single, and where have all the good ones gone. I’d rather see a layculture where there is a space for single people, but matchmaking is a part of that culture. In fact, it doesn’t even have to be matchmaking. It could be activities allowing those who are interested in finding a spouse to actually meet people they’re interested in.
Matchmaking? Seriously? Is being a single a disease that needs to be cured? If I came across a group that pressures single people to get married I would run the other way.

I can see if an individual wants to get married than the networking opportunities of groups would help. I have yet to see a singles group that does not pressure its members to get married. It may be different for Catholic single groups but it is true for Protestant single groups.
 
Matchmaking? Seriously? Is being a single a disease that needs to be cured? If I came across a group that pressures single people to get married I would run the other way.
Never did anyone say pressure. Never did anyone say singles are required to marry. But isn’t the focus of this post to address the ongoing issue of singles who wish to marry in a practical manner?

I said people who are single who desire to partake in activities to find a spouse should have the option to do so. I said this should be a part of singles ministry, not the entire thing.

I’m getting the impression that laypeople, as part of the Church’s body, don’t seem to want anything to do with this. It’s quite sad. Of course there are plenty of singles out there happy to be single, but for every one of those people I’ve come across 2-3 people who aren’t satisfied with being single and wish to marry. Why shouldn’t laypeople have a part to play in that? It’s actually a traditional part of Church body culture.
 
I’m sorry but your statement is confusing. Where did I, or anyone else, state they’re against promoting the clergy or religious life? Why would there need to be more groups about getting single people married when the singles groups could obviously serve that same purpose, too?

Might I point out there are far more people who are interested in getting married, have the strong desire to do so, and would like help with it? Are you suggesting we try to get these people to change their minds? That’s what discerning your vocation is about. If those who’ve determined they want married life why shouldn’t there be a way to assist them?
I didn’t say that anyone was out to get the clergy or the religious life. Almost every singles group is already at least indirectly about matchmaking.

I am saying that we need to consider that being single is a perfectly valid state and that we should stop pressuring people who do not desire to get married into getting married.
Supporting singles in being single might ultimately lead to healthier, holier marriages. If the Church as a culture focuses on matchmaking to “help” singles it’s sending the wrong message.

Joie de Vivre, do you think the Church sees being single as a vocation or a state in life? Or both?
Pope John Paul II , Vita Consecrata, no. 32: “As a way of showing forth the Church’s holiness, it is to be recognized that the consecrated life, which mirrors Christ’s own way of life, has an objective superiority. Precisely for this reason, it is an especially rich manifestation of Gospel values and a more complete expression of the Church’s purpose, which is the sanctification of humanity. The consecrated life proclaims and in a certain way anticipates the future age, when the fullness of the Kingdom of Heaven, already present in its first fruits and in mystery,[62] will be achieved and when the children of the resurrection will take neither wife nor husband, but will be like the angels of God (cf. Mt. 22:30)”
Pope Pius XII, Sacra Virginitas, no. 32: “This doctrine of the excellence of virginity and of celibacy and of their superiority over the married state was, as we have already said, revealed by our Divine Redeemer and by the Apostle of the Gentiles; so too, it was solemnly defined as a dogma of divine faith by the holy council of Trent, and explained in the same way by all the holy Fathers and Doctors of the Church."
Council of Trent, pg. 225: “If anyone saith that the marriage state is to be preferred before the state of virginity, let him be anathema.” …] "writing to the Corinthians, [Paul] says: I would that all men were even as myself; that is, that all embrace the virtue of continence…A life of continence is to be desired by all.”
Catechism of the Catholic Church, p. 916: “The state of the consecrated life is thus one way of experiencing a “more intimate” consecration, rooted in Baptism and dedicated totally to God. In the consecrated life, Christ’s faithful, moved by the Holy Spirit, propose to follow Christ more nearly, to give themselves to God who is loved above all and, pursuing the perfection of charity in the service of the Kingdom, to signify and proclaim in the Church the glory of the world to come.”
Saint Thomas Aquinas, ST II-II.152.4: “Virginity is more excellent than marriage, which can be seen by both faith and reason. Faith sees virginity as imitating the example of Christ and the counsel of St. Paul. Reason sees virginity as rightly ordering goods, preferring a Divine good to human goods, the good of the soul to the good of the body, and the good of the contemaplative life to that of the active life.”
religious-vocation.com/
Singlehood has been a vocation of recent. Historically it wasn’t good to be single, especially women, because you had married life or you could go into religious life.

What I’ve witnessed is when we start supporting single people in being single, they’re the same ones who end up complaining later on about how they dislike being single, and where have all the good ones gone. I’d rather see a layculture where there is a space for single people, but matchmaking is a part of that culture. In fact, it doesn’t even have to be matchmaking. It could be activities allowing those who are interested in finding a spouse to actually meet people they’re interested in.
In Europe there historically were plenty of single people, up to 20% remained unmarried and most of them were not part of religious life. Back then the concept of the extended family still existed in the West before being bludgeoned to death by the modernist abomination of the nuclear family. During that time family actually stuck together and it was relatively common for someone who was not immediate family to live with a family. Furthermore you also had other social structures such as beguinages creating space for unmarried people.
Never did anyone say pressure. Never did anyone say singles are required to marry. But isn’t the focus of this post to address the ongoing issue of singles who wish to marry in a practical manner?

I said people who are single who desire to partake in activities to find a spouse should have the option to do so. I said this should be a part of singles ministry, not the entire thing.

I’m getting the impression that laypeople, as part of the Church’s body, don’t seem to want anything to do with this. It’s quite sad. Of course there are plenty of singles out there happy to be single, but for every one of those people I’ve come across 2-3 people who aren’t satisfied with being single and wish to marry. Why shouldn’t laypeople have a part to play in that? It’s actually a traditional part of Church body culture.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top