At Last Supper, did Jesus hold himself in His hands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UKcatholicGuy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
U

UKcatholicGuy

Guest
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
 
Because He is God. This act is no less awesome than God speaking the world into existence, or being born of a virgin.

Peace
Fiat
 
Of course He did - is it not INCREDIBLE??? By holding the bread, infused and transformed into His Own Body,Blood Soul and Divinity THE WORD INCARNATE performed a miracle that seems - IS - a mind boggling mystery!

As Father Corapi says, there is no shame in saying we do not understand God!
 
8All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the book of life belonging to the Lamb that was slain from the creation of the world.a]
Click to expand...
Rev 13:8, that’s from the NIV.

Don’t try to corner God into ‘time,’ he exists outside of it.

And don’t make God out to be a liar either. What he says is truth.
 
What a ridiculous question. Tell your friend that God can do everything and anything.
 
40.png
UKcatholicGuy:
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
<Disclaimer: I believe the following to be in accordance with Church Teaching, however any deviation from Chruch Teaching is through my own error and misunderstanding and should be rejected>

CatholicGuy,

I think that some of the difficulty with this stems from some imprecision in our thinking about the Last Supper/Eucharist.

Christ is present (really and substantially) in the Eucharistic species in His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. He is present there sacramentally, by virtue of the power of the sacrament.

At the Last Supper, the fact that Christ had not yet died is no bar to His ability to offer Himself sacramentally in an unbloody way. This, is in fact, what happens at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

The difference is that at the Last Supper Christ offered Himself sacramentally in anticipation of His Sacrifice at Calvary, while at Mass He (and the priest and we) offers Himself sacramentally in a re-presentation of Calvary.

But, as you rightly noted, Christ had not yet died. That is not an obstacle, as we have seen, since the Eucharist is an unbloody sacrifice. However, much more significant is that at the time of the Last Supper, Christ had not yet risen. This is significant because the Eucharist is the whole Christ as mentioned above *BODY, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. *When we receive the Eucharist we receive Christ as He is now – and He has a post-ressurection and glorified body.

But the apostles recieved Him as He was then, and at that moment, before Calvary and the Resurrection ,He had a non-glorified mortal body. (Which is obvious, because without a mortal body He would not have been able to suffer death.)

The fact that Christ gave Himself to His apostles at the Last Supper before He had a glorified body is highly significant. This shows us that Christ is present in the Eucharist by power of the sacrament, and not by power of His glorifed body. To be sure He is present WITH His glorified body now, but that is not the reason why He can be present.

Therefore since Christt is really present in the Eucharist in a *sacramental *way, there is no problem with the Last Supper being before Calvary or the Mass being post-Calvary. Both sacramentally sacrifice, in an unbloody manner, the “one and for all” sacrifice at Calvary.

Thoughts? Does that help at all?

I’d like to discuss this further if you would like to!
God Bless,
VC
 
If you look at what else Jesus did in the Gospels, transubstantiating bread and wine into his body and blood does not seem out of character for him. Remember what happened at the wedding feast of Cana? There, Jesus not only changed the substance (transubstantiated) of water into wine but the accidents of water into wine as well. Remember what happened when the crowds listening to Jesus grew hungry? Jesus multiplied loaves and fishes numerous times. At the Last Supper when Jesus transubstantiated bread and wine into his body and blood, he multiplied his body and blood, as he had previously multiplied loaves and fishes, and he changed the substance (transubstantiated) of the bread and wine into his body and blood, as he had previously changed water into wine.
 
40.png
UKcatholicGuy:
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
didn’t Jesus say “this is my body”??

i guess Jesus meant it was his body…

🙂
 
Your Baptist friend has the same problem I see a lot in Protestantism (but of course it exists elsewhere too). Since he (she?) can’t comprehend something outside of our experience, he thinks it can’t happen. Catholics believe that Christ’s Sacrifice exists not only in time but also outside of time. Christ Himself made this very clear on the night of the Last Supper when He said “this is my Body which is given” and “this is My blood…which is poured out”.
 
Which is more difficult to believe, that the Almighty Divine God became a finite, mortal man or that when Jesus said, “This is my body” that He meant it? If we can believe the first then the second is easy.
 
40.png
UKcatholicGuy:
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
Sure did! Tell her Christ can do anything - doesn’t he/she believe Christ can do anything? Wow, that was easy! Next question!
 
And was carried in His Own Hands:” how “carried in His Own Hands”? Because when He commended His Own Body and Blood, He took into His Hands that which the faithful know; and in a manner carried Himself, when He said, “This is My Body.”
Click to expand...
St. Augustine - Commentary on Psalm 34
 
40.png
UKcatholicGuy:
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
He held his own body because the modes of presence were different. In the natural mode, Jesus was physically present standing before his Apostles. In the Eucharist he is still physically present but supernaturally and sacramentally. Thus Christ was able to to be present in two seperate places by doing so in two separate ways. The supernatrual mode of presence can occur in multiple locations.
 
The problem you all have is weather Jesus would or come tell his disciples to do something that is a SIN. The Mosaic or Levitical Law forbad the drinking of blood of any living creature. This is why many of his disciples left when he told them to drink his blood. They thought that Jesus was asking to break the law.
 
40.png
blackstone:
The problem you all have is weather Jesus would or come tell his disciples to do something that is a SIN. The Mosaic or Levitical Law forbad the drinking of blood for living creature. It is impossible for God to do.
Click to expand...
God is not a creature…

🙂
 
40.png
UKcatholicGuy:
We believe Christ instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper on the night before He died. But if He had yet to die and complete the sacrifice, how did He hold His own Body and Blood in His sacred hands?

A baptist friend asked me this, and I didn’t really have an answer. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
Good one! Cuts right to the point on the matter of the Lord’s supper. Hyperbole, sheer hyperbole.

Hyperbole has a respected place in teaching. Don’t make the mistake of expecting every word Jesus says to be LITERALLY true. What he says IS true, of course. But we must take it as it is meant. And we must take it very seriously. He probably uses hyperbole only to highlight a concept his hearers are likely to miss without it. When Jesus speaks in hyperbole, we must be a thousand times more careful to listen. But we’d better discern when Jesus is speaking in hyperbole, or we’ll make big mistakes in interpreting Scripture.
 
Yes but the man Jesus was and it was the man Jesus blood they were to drink.
 
This is an interesting thread. I know that the Church teaches of a phenomena called bilocation. That is when a person can be in two different places at the same exact time. Numerous saints were given this power–one saint even held a mass and heard confessions at the same time! I wonder if this is similar to what happened at the Last Supper? Thoughts?

Pax tecum

~Stephen
 
40.png
blackstone:
Yes but the man Jesus was and it was the man Jesus blood they were to drink.
Click to expand...
Jesus is God… He didn’t open his veins and offer blood…
just as a creature couldn’t have granted us salvation by
dying on the cross…

you are trying to put the same rules on God that would
apply to men… that did apply to men in Jesus’ time on
earth… but Jesus was still, and is still God…

so, He didn’t have to play by those rules… He says,
this is my blood… then it was His blood… He had already
upset a number of his followers by revealing to them that
they would have to eat His flesh, and drink His blood…

then why is it so difficult to believe that before his ‘human’
nature bled, his ‘divine’ nature could offer up His flesh,
and His blood, just as He said it would be done?

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top