I say we use this to our advantage when an athiest and the ACLU lawyer trys to ban religions. We can now say that they are forcing their religion on us.
I was just thinking the same thing when I say the thread. Hopefully the courts can see it.
My thoughts exactly. If atheism is a religion, baldness is a hair colour.
Yeah, yeah. And Christianity is a polytheistic religion. It has three gods. Not to count all the demigods like angels, demons, beasts, … :whacky:
What kind of idiots are in the courts? What’s next? Will they proclaim the President as being infallible when speaking ex cathedra about domestic issues? :whacky:
Hey, look whose talking a devout religious Atheist. Why’d you put “Atheist” under Religion in your profile? :whacky:
You took the words right out of my mouth! Ah, the wisdom of the judicial system!
You’re right. That was foolish. Thank you for pointing that out, so I can correct it.
An atheist need not to do anything of that kind. He just has to look at the facts, use his brain, and come to a conclusion.
I would qualify this as “some religious people”, but in any case I have always considered this as the apologetic equivalent of pounding a square peg into a round hole. It’s a bit like attacking somebody for not playing a game by stating that non-participation is a misinterpretation of the rules, isn’t it?
**You’re welcome.
**
it need be neither, though it may sometimes be either or both.
Both require faith to say in earnest and integrity. God cannot be proven (despite what the Summa has to say on the matter) therefore He cannot be disproven.