B
bobballen_18
Guest
What are the most common reasons atheists give for not believing, and how do we as Catholics (and other Christians) refute them?
They usually say there is no evidence of a God, and we usually respond that one has to have faith and that there is no disproof of God.What are the most common reasons atheists give for not believing, and how do we as Catholics (and other Christians) refute them?
Hi there. Let me first same I’m not looking to get into a pointless debate on what constitues proof, etc. I am going to try to leave one simple reply and leave it at that.What are the most common reasons atheists give for not believing, and how do we as Catholics (and other Christians) refute them?
Hi! I’m not trying to get into a debate either, it’s just that I am curious. So I just want to make sure I understand you correctly - are you saying that God cannot be tested, challenged, or provide consistent results?Hi there. Let me first same I’m not looking to get into a pointless debate on what constitues proof, etc. I am going to try to leave one simple reply and leave it at that.
The biggest reason I don’t believe is because I do not see any real, testable evidence that god exists. I do not believe things on faith if they cannot be tested, challenged, or have consistant results.
Although I do not want to speak for him, yes, that is generally what they say. For example, we will give an argument such as how did matter come from absolute nothingness, and then there will be a scientific debate until it dwindles down to two people (one Catholic and one Atheist), and generally the Atheist will end by saying that it is irrational to jump to the conclusion of God. One might not be able to explain at the moment how the universe came into being, but it would be irrational and unaccepted if someone did the same thing in other terms. Christians, to counter that, would say that you have faith and choose the one that is more rational. And then the thread dies.Hi! I’m not trying to get into a debate either, it’s just that I am curious. So I just want to make sure I understand you correctly - are you saying that God cannot be tested, challenged, or provide consistent results?
Although I do not want to speak for him, yes, that is generally what they say. For example, we will give an argument such as how did matter come from absolute nothingness, and then there will be a scientific debate until it dwindles down to two people (one Catholic and one Atheist), and generally the Atheist will end by saying that it is irrational to jump to the conclusion of God. One might not be able to explain at the moment how the universe came into being, but it would be irrational and unaccepted if someone did the same thing in other terms. Christians, to counter that, would say that you have faith and choose the one that is more rational. And then the thread dies.
My atheism and the disbelief of many people has few or nothing to do with our personal experiences. The existence of suffer, misery and pain could be one of the many many reasons we don’t believe in religions and gods. Just to clear it more.Faith is a gift, as the Pope states. The lack of it is something that in itself cannot be refuted.
youtube.com/watch?v=3QuRe66k8m8
However, if a person is convinced by the evil and troubles in this world that a loving God cannot exist, there are arguments one can use, but what you cannot successfully argue with, is the emotional and consequent intellectual convictions these persons have resulting from their observations and experience of what is wrong and evil in this world, or because of the disappointments experienced in their lives. There are certainly arguments…but using them to convince some atheists achieves nothing.
Others may be open to argument. But there is no guaranteed way of convincing an atheist that God exists.
Fair comment.My atheism and the disbelief of many people has few or nothing to do with our personal experiences. The existence of suffer, misery and pain could be one of the many many reasons we don’t believe in religions and gods. Just to clear it more.
If you husband blamed God, then he was not an atheist.
Fair comment.That was transitional. He was a replying to a question from his doctor at the height of his illness many years ago…and he is in fact an atheist. He does not believe in God or an afterlife.
I’m aware it is a matter of conviction for atheists, not a refusal to recognise God but a genuine disbelief in a divine being and a genuine perception of the universe from defined scientific principles. There are two sides to the argument, and I know much that can be said on both sides…but as it happens, myself believe. I was a very devout child which put God center stage of my life, of every day, daily Mass, lots of prayers. Even for a devout child who has a very questioning mind, sometimes there is a time of fire to go though. In my husband’s case, he went from no faith to faith, then back to no faith.
You have a radio?The biggest reason I don’t believe is because I do not see any real, testable evidence that god exists.
Hi there.You have a radio?
You cannot see, hear, smell, touch or taste radiowaves but you believe they are there!
You are alive which provides evidence that God exists.Hi there.
I really don’t want to debate. That being said, yes I have a radio. I can tune in to a radio station which provides evidence that radio waves exist.
===> God is alive which provides evidence that an Upper God exists. Does this make sense?You are alive which provides evidence that God exists.
My friend, if you look in the mirror and honestly ask yourself how you came to be and search the world over for that answer, you wont find it in the mind of any man. But if you research Scripture in its lineage and word, and realize what it provides with the impossibility that by man alone it could speak of all it does, past present and future and its fulfilled prophecies; how it remains relevant to every event that has occurred to societies and individuals through today, and how there is not an argument one can raise that is not addressed, you will come to recognize there is only one source that could know what to present that for over thousands of years no man could outgrow in regard to its relevance. We say that rational thought supports faith and it is true. The doubts of the existence of God under the premise that the senses can not prove He exists abandon rational thought. One can not expect to have a relationship with someone in whom they express no interest. Man or woman, if you want to “get to know” someone and the desire to have a relationship with them, you have to take the initiative to learn about them. It is true with God. Once having developed a relationship with someone, you must have faith in them for that relationship to remain meaningful.===> God is alive which provides evidence that an Upper God exists. Does this make sense?
Ok, I will send you a youtube video on your inbox that explains what you just mentioned.My friend, if you look in the mirror and honestly ask yourself how you came to be and search the world over for that answer, you wont find it in the mind of any man. But if you research Scripture in its lineage and word, and realize what it provides with the impossibility that by man alone it could speak of all it does, past present and future and its fulfilled prophecies; how it remains relevant to every event that has occurred to societies and individuals through today, and how there is not an argument one can raise that is not addressed, you will come to recognize there is only one source that could know what to present that for over thousands of years no man could outgrow in regard to its relevance. We say that rational thought supports faith and it is true. The doubts of the existence of God under the premise that the senses can not prove He exists abandon rational thought. One can not expect to have a relationship with someone in whom they express no interest. Man or woman, if you want to “get to know” someone and the desire to have a relationship with them, you have to take the initiative to learn about them. It is true with God. Once having developed a relationship with someone, you must have faith in them for that relationship to remain meaningful.
One cannot say that any loving relationship he or she has with another person does not require faith in them unless one would claim to know the other person’s future actions, motivations and choices. The same is true with God.
But we can not confront someone we do not know and express doubt in them and their credibility insisting they prove themselves to us with an ultimatum that if they don’t, we will reject them, and expect to develop a relationship with them. It is like my not knowing you but confronting you and saying, “I do not believe you could be a credible positive influence in my life and I have no interest in getting to know you to make that determination, so unless you decide to prove to me you are credible and will be a positive influence in my life, I reject you.” This is the atheistic approach to God. But if one wants to learn the truth seriously enough to search for it, they will find it. Think honestly about it; if man followed the premise throughout his existence that nothing exists except what he can experience with his senses, we would still be wearing animal skins for clothing. It is only by searching that we discover. If I am wrong you have nothing to loose.
Peace brother
Actually it did not pertain to what I had wrote so I responded PM. thanks again.Ok, I will send you a youtube video on your inbox that explains what you just mentioned.
Actually it did not pertain to what I had wrote so I responded PM. thanks again.