My road was quite close to DaddyGirl. I always liked intellectual challenges, to talk to people with different points of view. After all what can one learn from talking into a mirror?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"
I frequented all sorts of religious on-line forums, and had interesting conversations with many people.
I saw a significant difference between the catholic and the protestant approaches. Only in Catholicism is there a central authority. When discussing a subject with a protestant it was always possible that their personal interpretation was only their own, and it was something I have never seen before. It was both interesting and frustrating.
I thought that with Catholicism it is different. Having one central authority it is more likely that the differences will be minor. Of course I was wrong - as usual.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"
There is an ongoing “fight” here between the orthodox and the heterodox points of view, with very little tolerance for the other side.
Not to mention the extremely little tolerance for the views of the unbelievers. As posters we are tolerated, no problem there. But the views we represent are not. No surprise there… why tolerate the voice of the “evil ones”? The trouble is that there is a strong resistance toward the attempts to clarify the misunderstanding, to reach over the abyss. To be insulted like: “the fool in his heart say there is no God” is not a big deal, even if it is insulting. When the term of “scientism” is hurled all over the place, and when the explanation is being ignored, now that is quite hard to swallow. To see the same fallacies repeated all over the place is very hard to understand.
If and when I make incorrect assumptions about catholicism, and I am corrected, I learn something new. I have (almost) never seen an admission from the other side; like “Yep, I was wrong, thanks for the clarification”. Not even when we point out an incorrect assumption and we use a literal quote from the Bible to show the error. The answer is always: “you are not qualified to interpret the bible”. But they never give the “correct” interpretation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"
There is no “Catholic Annotated Bible”, which would point out which parts are to be taken literally, and which ones must be viewed allegorically.
As for myself. I was baptized in a Calvinist church, but of course I had nothing to do with the event, except being there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"
Later I went to church - pretty much every Sunday, also to bible study classes. And then I started to see the discrepancy between reality and the teachings. Finally I lost all my faith.
I am not interested in converting anyone. But I would very much like to see a common usage of the basic words and concepts. Without a common vocabulary there can be no real communication.
What I would very much like is to have a serious conversation with
real apologists, who do not make elementary logical errors and fallacies. And who are able to argue based upon reason and logic. After all it is stated in the catechism that God’s existence can be demonstrated in a fully rational fashion, without even mentioning “faith”. Maybe it will happen, who knows? But I do not hold my breath.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"