Hi there.
Can someone help me understand the atonement?
I should know this already, but how does Jesus’ suffering on the cross affect us? I’ve heard of ‘penal substitution’, and it seems to make sense, but I’ve heard it’s not what the church teaches.
Or was it just a symbol for God’s love for us? Sorry if these are heretical, but I’m just trying to work stuff out.
So if someone could explain it to me or give me an article online, that would be awesome.
Thanks!!!
I don’t think any human understands the actual mechanics, so to speak, of atonement. For us, there is still much mystery. What we do know is that Jesus did make atonement for the sin/s of the world.
Re “penal substitution”: Usually the way I’ve heard this teaching explained is that every sin involves a punishment. So, for someone (Jesus) to atone for all sin, all the punishments involved needed to be “added up” and the
total amount of wrath/pain/etc. due for all these sins was inflicted upon Jesus. Jesus took it all, as a substitute for us This concept of penal substitution is contrary to Church teaching. That it’s erroneous becomes obvious when one considers that faithful Christians still do experience pain, suffering, and death.
Jesus was afflicted for our sins, bore our sins. (Isaiah 53)
Have you read paragraphs 613-623 in the Catechism? Here is a link if you don’t have the book.
vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1O.HTM
What I will give now are just some of my own thoughts - ways of looking at atonement that don’t involve the penal aspect. I don’t “believe” these thoughts, I just consider them “possible” ways of understanding (that would be in conformity with Church teaching and Scripture).
One of the things I ponder are St. Paul’s words (Romans 5 and 1 Cor 15) - first Adam and second/Adam.
When the first Adam brought death for all, it came about through only one sin. He, personally experienced the punishment (pain, death) of only his own sin/s. (However, altho not personally experienced by Adam, the “amount” of pain/sin/death multiplied hugely throughout time.)
Then, in considering the atonement, I consider Jesus as personally taking on the punitive consequences of sin (pain, death), experiencing them in His human nature (not just sure how to state this) at an “individual” level/degree (as opposed to the “added up total penal” concept). Jesus “took on” pain, suffering, death, experienced it fully in His human nature - and through His perfect obedience (making reparation for Adam’s disobedience) overcame death/passed through it and was resurrected with a body and soul now immortally alive.
The restoration of union between God and man was accomplished by Jesus; the flow of supernatural life to humans restored (sacraments). Through the power of God’s life, our cooperation with it, we too can withstand suffering/pain/death without mortally sinning.
Will stop now. (Tried to give just an outline; my thoughts could go on endlessly!!!) That is kind of a basic outlook that I bring into readings of Church teaching and Scripture about atonement, expiation, etc. I’d chuck it in a minute if it ever conflicted with either. My biggest concern when I share personal thoughts is that the words I use won’t express accurately what I mean and could be understood in way that is contrary to Church teaching or thinking.