Attending multiple parishes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lenten_ashes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the point that is confusing is that canonical membership and registered membership are not necessarily the same thing in many US dioceses.
That’s not (necessarily) the case.

One cannot take personal experience and try to apply it to an entire country.

Although things have slowed-down a bit in recent years, not all that long ago, many diocese in the U.S. went through very dramatic and even drastic re-districting (to borrow a secular term) of parishes. This happened in places where Catholicism has been traditionally a very significant (numerically) presence.

To name * just a few* places, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania have seen their parish boundaries re-drawn in recent years. Parish territory is extremely relevant in those places. I can assure you that the people who live there are very much aware of how parish territory works, especially those who found themselves in a situation where they were unhappy with those new boundaries.

Those places comprise a huge number of Catholics.
The concept of registration is for mailings, tracking, fundraising, etc. It carries no legal rights or responsibilities.
Yes. Exactly. People need to know this.
I’ve never set foot in my parish church based of Canon Law; I’m registered 25 minutes away, and there’s never been a sacramental issue as our bishops are lenient on this. When our next archbishop is installed, he may well (within his rights) enforce things more strictly meaning I will need to be more acquainted with my true parish pastor, whoever he is…
And that’s exactly why people need to know this.

At present (in your own case, and similar for others), if there are any issues of jurisdiction, those can be worked-out on the local level, or sometimes solved by the bishop delegating jurisdiction to priests through the particular law of the diocese.

Yet, there’s no guarantee that such things might continue into the future. That’s why this issue is a pet-peeve of mine. If we’re going to discuss this issue on a CAF forum, it’s important that readers understand what the law says, specifically how the Church defines parish membership.
 
Father,
The question of financial support has come up in this thread. Can you confirm that, under the current code, we are obliged to support the Church, but not necessarily our canonical territorial parish?
In my case, I sometimes attend Mass at my territorial parish, but as the Cathedral has far more Mass times available I, more often than not, head down to the Cathedral. Scheduling can be tricky. Then there’s a third parish that I often attend on weekdays for Mass and confession. I’ve given to all three parishes as well as directly to the Archdiocese and various charitable arms of the Archdiocese and/or Canadian Bishops, but I would say my territorial parish receives a relatively small percentage of my overall tithing.
 
Father,
The question of financial support has come up in this thread. Can you confirm that, under the current code, we are obliged to support the Church, but not necessarily our canonical territorial parish?
There is no provision in the Code of Canon Law that speaks about an obligation to support the proper parish as such financially.

Can. 222 §1. The Christian faithful are obliged to assist with the needs of the Church so that the Church has what is necessary for divine worship, for the works of the apostolate and of charity, and for the decent support of ministers.

That’s rather vague. We all know that means “put money in the collection basket” (at least in cultures where there is a monetary collection, which will apply to most readers on this forum). However, the Code does not specify that we are obligated to support our own parishes or diocese.

The Code is vague. In my opinion, that’s intentional. I say that because it’s a universal code, and the exact circumstances of how that obligation is fulfilled is going to vary greatly both by geography and by individual.

I do believe that it is implied in the Code that we should support our own proper parishes. I say that because it’s clear from other parts of the Code that there is a communal relationship between the individual person and the proper parish. I see that relationship as an important value in the code.

The Code does speak about the rights of the Christian Faithful. They have the right to the Sacraments and other spiritual goods of the Church from their own proper pastors (usual conditions). Since a right to the ministry does exist, logically there is a corresponding obligation to support that ministry–even if it’s not directly articulated in the Code.

Contrast this topic with a purely secular one. A fast food chain really doesn’t care which one of their restaurants a customer chooses to patronize. It makes no difference to them (without making an absurd reduction like “if no one goes there, they’ll close it”) When I mail a letter, it doesn’t matter which post office I use. There is no relationship. That’s important. A Catholic parish is not merely some kind of franchise or branch-office; instead it’s a community that exists within a larger community.
In my case, I sometimes attend Mass at my territorial parish, but as the Cathedral has far more Mass times available I, more often than not, head down to the Cathedral. Scheduling can be tricky. Then there’s a third parish that I often attend on weekdays for Mass and confession. I’ve given to all three parishes as well as directly to the Archdiocese and various charitable arms of the Archdiocese and/or Canadian Bishops, but I would say my territorial parish receives a relatively small percentage of my overall tithing.
That’s your choice. I respect that–especially because from a distance, I have no idea of the specifics.

Now, hypothetically speaking, if someone were to say “my parish is struggling financially” I might (just might) suggest that a person adjust the numbers and give more to the home parish instead of the other.

Your last paragraph really isn’t something I can address in a forum like this. That’s a personal choice you make. What I can say, however, is that objectively speaking, you are certainly not violating anything in Canon Law–that much I can certainly say.

Addendum:

The Catechism has this to say:

2043 …The faithful also have the duty of providing for the material needs of the Church, each according to his abilities.

Same as the Code. No specific mention of ones proper parish.
 
Searched the diocese website no parish boundary map anywhere, not even a hint of one. Only a parish finder by zip code but multiple parishes come up when you use that

Checked google to see if i can find anything and no luck there.

Diocese is sometimes hard to get a hold of and get info.

Nevertheless, this has been a interesting thread and I learned something new. Thanks for all the replies, I read them all.
 
In my town, people, including me, have moved from parish to parish as they see fit. I’m in the process of doing that right now.

Two neighboring parishes, one that was “paid off” financially is next to a parish that is in debt, over a million dollars. The two churches were canonically merged by the bishop. But, people who had paid off their debt are resentful of the parish with the million dollar debt. In fact, the joint income of the parish is now less than the sum of the incomes before the merger. There are very hard feeling about this.

This problem is on top of a 100+ year old feud between the churches over an incident which I will not digress to discuss. But, this resentment is still alive. The churches have their own, separate weekend liturgies.

The Sunday evening Mass is the “city” Mass, where people are encouraged to attend from across the city. The local priests rotate in celebrating this Mass. It used to be in another church. A person can deposit an offertory envelope from their own church in the collection, and it will be routed to the appropriate parish. The looseness partly results, I’m sure, from the fact that most of the parish schools have been closed, and the churches support one central elementary and one central high school. So, the money flows between the parishes no matter what.

Catholics in this town are “all over the map” each weekend.

I think the answer to the OP is to register at one church, for sure, but attend the church where you get the most spiritual benefit.

Bishops, priests, and laymen travel virtually everyplace and attend Mass wherever they find themselves. Nobody’s checking membership cards here - yet.
 
Searched the diocese website no parish boundary map anywhere, not even a hint of one. Only a parish finder by zip code but multiple parishes come up when you use that

Checked google to see if i can find anything and no luck there.

Diocese is sometimes hard to get a hold of and get info.

Nevertheless, this has been a interesting thread and I learned something new. Thanks for all the replies, I read them all.
This sort of thing might or might not be on a diocese website.

I would suggest not trying to contact the diocese. That’s not the sort of information they always have readily available, and the person who answers the phone will usually be there just to route the call to the appropriate office, and might not even know which office.

Pastors know their own territory. Feel free to ask either or both pastors. If the response is “where do you live?” followed by “then you are (or can be) a member here.” That will settle it.
 
I haven’t been on these forums for a while…

There are real reasons to attend a different parish than you are a member of. My wife and I are taking care of my mother-in-law who suffers from dementia. Sometimes one of our children will show up on Sunday morning and announce we (my wife and I) can attend Mass together, and they’ll watch grandma.

I even lector at my local church, but since it is close I am an infrequent attendee and my wife is the one who attends. I go to a variety of other parishes unless it is my week to lector. Sometimes (not often) she is unable to participate on Sunday at any mass because it is my lector week. Usually we can arrange with one of the children.

But really it is important to attend the parish you are a member of. There is no prohibition against attending two masses if you want to. I think there is prohibition against receiving more than three times in a day for laypersons, but I’d have to look that up.
 
I’ve been in a similar situation for many years now. Both my mom and I live in the same parish (the parish boundaries are clearly defined and well known by those of us who’ve lived here a long time), but since my mom is disabled, she prefers to attend our neighboring parish where the church is better suited for wheelchairs and walkers. Since I take her to church there, I haven’t been to a Sunday liturgy at my home parish for over ten years, but I do often attend daily Mass there on my own. As I am spiritually supported by both parishes, so to speak, I support both parishes financially, my home parish through electronic giving, and the neighboring parish through the collection basket.
 
Several years ago, my territorial parish (which was also my baptismal parish) was closed. The next parish I joined, which was also close to me territorially was suspended. I never received any guidance from the Diocese of where to go. I went through several years where I didn’t know what parish to join, so I attended Mass at various parishes in the area. Several years passed and I finally felt that I’d found the parish God was calling me to and joined it in 2012. There was never an issue made of it by the priest, nor my current pastor, and both are very faithful to the Magisterium.

I think it’s important to remember that the effect of parish closings on this issue.

God bless.
 
I sometimes go to the Cathedral for Sunday Mass even though I belong to a parish in the suburbs. The rector if the Cathedral does not have a problem with neither do any of the priest at my home parish.
 
They finally called the Cardinal’s office and learned that her home did NOT fall into ANY church boundaries. At the time the church boundaries were set up her home was owned by a Jewish man who wanted nothing to do with the church boundaries.
My post does nothing to further this thread. Feel free to ignore me. With due respect to your friend, her sister, and his eminence, the Cardinal – This sounds completely bogus to me. :whacky:

Suppose I declare that I want nothing to do with the USA, and I declare my property to be the free state of Tee_Eff_Em_Topia? I highly doubt the municipal, state, nor federal governments would care one whit about my feelings in the matter, and I’m going to have to continue to pay taxes to all three of them. Why should the diocese consider whether the gentleman cares or not that they “annex” his property?

:twocents:
Get off my lawn, ya’ dang kids!
tee
 
We attend a different parish than the one we are registered at as it offers an evening mass that works with our schedule. It fulfills your Sunday obligation as long as you attend Mass…doesn’t have to be a particular parish.
I was registered at a parish other than our local one as it was the one I grew up attending and wanted to be married there. Our city has numerous Catholic parishes with different mass times (a blessing i’m grateful for) and i was always told it didn’t matter where i attended as long as I did.
It’s a good idea to have roots in a parish where you can build community, if you have child(ren)where they can take religious instruction or attend school, etc. but it’s perfectly acceptable to attend a Mass at any Catholic parish.

This article helped me to understand canon law in plain english:
canonlawmadeeasy.com/2008/04/11/parish-registration/
 
For what it’s worth: In 2013, when we relocated to a diocese in AZ, we bought a house which turned out to be just inside the boundaries of parish #1 which was located 5 miles away, but required a drive of 30 min. due to heavy traffic and poor routes; 2 miles away, was parish #2 with driving time of 7 min. We made the assumption that because one of our new neighbors were Catholic and went to the closer church, we must belong to that parish and registered there. Learned later that we should have registered in parish #1, but that due to unusual traffic conditions, the 2 parishes–with the approval of the bishop–allowed “reasonable adjustments”, particularly for the elderly–which included us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top