Attention Protestants in favor of the Refomation!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Image_of_God
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Once again these are NOT Calvin only doctrines…When did I say that you were.
Are you permanent fixated on this or what? :banghead:
I use !!! to get your attention.
You had my attention, the extra !'s are jsut annoying.
I never said you believe in OSAS.
Image of God:
You can become unsaved!!!
Paul states we must remain in the kindness of God. You can put your soul in danger even if you were saved. I believe that being unsure of how your eternity will be causes for more faith than knowing it because of the uncertainty.
This was in response to me saying that a person can become usaved. !'s included. Sounded to me like you thought I believed in OSAS.
Image of God:
I never said you were Calvinist. I never even said you were Protestant. I never said that ALL Protestants believed these things. I never said Paul said we didn’t need to do works. These are only assumptions that you concluded on your own and this is completely off topic from the title. I never said that you said that someone could not become unsaved.
These are things you are too touchy about. Again… I ASKED you if you understood about all protestants not being Calvinist and then you went nuts. Sheesh I didn’t accuse you of saying anything about Paul, Paul was in my explanation of my understanding of the docrtine of Justification. Because Paul has things to say about it as well as James. If they seemingly say something different and the Bible dosn’t contradict itself… then we have to see how they go together and not pick what we want it to mean. You are reading EVERYTHING I say as somehow accusing and insulting when NONE of it is ment that way. Take a deep breath and get that chip off your shoulder!
In a later post at 5:38 you just said that you do not believe the Pope is replaces God. Which is it? You also said somewhere that the Trinity is not in the Bible at 4:49 p.m.
but at 7:48 on the same exact day you said. “Don’t get me wrong, I never said the Trinity is not in the Bible. I just said the word Trinity isn’t…” Which is it?
I don’t think Catholic make the “Pope replace God”, I also don’t believe the Pope is ever infalliable because he is Human. How is that contradictory?
I said the WORD Trinity is not in the Bible. It was an example of a true doctrine that is taught in the Bible without being spelled out in the terms we use… like the inerrant scriptures.
Your statements are constantly contradicting each other. I have gone back to answer all the questions I saw so that we can get back to the real question in which you never answered.🙂
If I have still not answered you then please explain the question better because I have covered why I disagree with the Catholic Church on quite a few doctrines so far. Id that not what you wanted to ask?
 
You do misunderstand them. Who said the Pope himself was infallible? From the Catholic definition it says only when he speaks excathedra. It never said he was free from sin and error…that is what infallible means.
Who did? that is a good question. Don’t assume. I didn’t. “when he speaks excathedra” is a specific area where he IS considered infalliable. So you are saying that excathedra is not free of error? How about Bishops proclaiming doctrine at General Council? Falliable? No? well then they are infalliable at certian points.
Who said there is any other mediator besides Jesus. Saints are NOT mediators. They are people. And they are more innocent than you and I are because they are in heaven. Isn’t it correct to pray to a fellow human being? How much more human are they?
I wasn’t referring to saints. I was referring to Mary and Priests.
I never take my adoration of Mary to far. If you are in fact a sister or brother of Christ and she is his mother should we not honor her as a mother?
Wether you take you adoration too far is a matter of opinion and somewhat vague. I personally wouldn’t know since I don’t know you. However, The Catholic Church insists you believe some things about Mary that I don’t agree with and thing are “too far.” I do not believe she remained a virgin her entire life and I don’t believe she was totally and completely sinless. It follows from those that I don’t believe in her assumption. I also have some issues with her titles of Mediatrix*, *Co-Redemptrix
I beginning to think that our definitions are the EXACT same it is just the name.
Then you are mistaken. You include works were I say works are equally imporatant but fall in a different catagory. They are similar but the difference means the difference in HOW one loses their salvation. If they were EXACTLY the same why would have been a main point in the reformation?
The bible specifically says that there are deadly(mortal) sins in the letter of one John. If not mortal what does it mean? These are far from what the Cathechism teaches. In fact I think you do misunderstand them.
The punishment fo ALL sin is death. All sin seperates us from God. ALL sin displeases God. In order to achieve heaven by works we must be perfect in every way. Venial sins still count against you just as much. Mortal sins only cause more unpleasant concequences here on earth and harden your heart towards God more, making it harder to repent and increasing the seperation gap between you and God.
If you did not accuse me of calling you Calvinist check your post at 4:49 p.m on September 10. I am pretty sure you are Protestant. You obviously did not read the part above the doctrines if you think that is all I meant.
I felt that you were specifically targeting Calvinists. I also felt you didn’t understand the very people you were trying to converse with. I’m sorry that you misunderstood my posts. You don’t seem to have a clear understanding of protestant beliefs. IF you do you simply have not conveyed it well.

I understood that in an effort to convince those who are not Catholic that you wanted to know why doctrines and issues keep us from converting. I began with the doctrines you listed and attempted to show how I do not agree with the Catholic Church. One cannot convert to a faith they cannot wholly adhere to or they are a hypocrite.
I had already defined my doctrine of Sola Scriptura by the 2nd time you asked me. I have no intention of being mean. You clearly accused me…but then you explained yourself. I know you probably didn’t think you did, but I cannot know the feelings of heart. What you type I have to interpret it neutraly. Most of your saying are definite statements about things I never said so I take them as accusations.
Maybe I should refrain from talking to you more then. even after I explained myself you still keep going on about it. Most of what I’m saying is explaining my OWN beliefs not trying to accuse you of anything.
 
Dear “image of god”

I have read all of the posts here so far; and would like to ask if you intend to address a number of texts which I referred to to try and make some points; but to which you have not yet addressed. I understand that you are probably busy as a beaver; but I am interested in discussing in depth the following list of points which I have been hoping you would soon address. I have made it easier for you by itemizing each text, and the post # you will find it in:

Eph.2:8-9 post #23
John 6:63 post#23
Matthew 21:43 post #27
John 16:13, Acts 19:2 post #27
Jo.21:25 post #31

If you have posted briefly on one of these, please forgive me; but I am interested in some in depth study on why I am wrong on the comments I made of these texts.
When you are able to study these out a bit with me, then I will look forward to studying the comments you made re Peter being the rock that Jesus Built His Church upon. :tiphat:
 
Dear “image of god”

I have read all of the posts here so far; and would like to ask if you intend to address a number of texts which I referred to to try and make some points; but to which you have not yet addressed. I understand that you are probably busy as a beaver; but I am interested in discussing in depth the following list of points which I have been hoping you would soon address. I have made it easier for you by itemizing each text, and the post # you will find it in:

Eph.2:8-9 post #23
John 6:63 post#23
Matthew 21:43 post #27
John 16:13, Acts 19:2 post #27
Jo.21:25 post #31

If you have posted briefly on one of these, please forgive me; but I am interested in some in depth study on why I am wrong on the comments I made of these texts.
When you are able to study these out a bit with me, then I will look forward to studying the comments you made re Peter being the rock that Jesus Built His Church upon. :tiphat:
I will answers these questions…just let me answer Syele first.
 
Are you permanent fixated on this or what? :banghead:

You had my attention, the extra !'s are jsut annoying.

This was in response to me saying that a person can become usaved. !'s included. Sounded to me like you thought I believed in OSAS.

These are things you are too touchy about. Again… I ASKED you if you understood about all protestants not being Calvinist and then you went nuts. Sheesh I didn’t accuse you of saying anything about Paul, Paul was in my explanation of my understanding of the docrtine of Justification. Because Paul has things to say about it as well as James. If they seemingly say something different and the Bible dosn’t contradict itself… then we have to see how they go together and not pick what we want it to mean. You are reading EVERYTHING I say as somehow accusing and insulting when NONE of it is ment that way. Take a deep breath and get that chip off your shoulder!

I don’t think Catholic make the “Pope replace God”, I also don’t believe the Pope is ever infalliable because he is Human. How is that contradictory?
I said the WORD Trinity is not in the Bible. It was an example of a true doctrine that is taught in the Bible without being spelled out in the terms we use… like the inerrant scriptures.

If I have still not answered you then please explain the question better because I have covered why I disagree with the Catholic Church on quite a few doctrines so far. Id that not what you wanted to ask?
I was thinking about it at school and maybe I was a little too touchy sounding. The thought actually haunted me throughout the day. I didn’t mean to be annoying I just wanted you to know if you were paying attention. I am very truly sorry. Would you please forgive me?
 
Dear “image of god”

I have read all of the posts here so far; and would like to ask if you intend to address a number of texts which I referred to to try and make some points; but to which you have not yet addressed. I understand that you are probably busy as a beaver; but I am interested in discussing in depth the following list of points which I have been hoping you would soon address. I have made it easier for you by itemizing each text, and the post # you will find it in:

Eph.2:8-9 post #23
John 6:63 post#23
Matthew 21:43 post #27
John 16:13, Acts 19:2 post #27
Jo.21:25 post #31

If you have posted briefly on one of these, please forgive me; but I am interested in some in depth study on why I am wrong on the comments I made of these texts.
When you are able to study these out a bit with me, then I will look forward to studying the comments you made re Peter being the rock that Jesus Built His Church upon. :tiphat:
If I do that on this post we will go off topic, so make another post so I and other people can answer and then your answers will be quicker and more efficient.
 
I was thinking about it at school and maybe I was a little too touchy sounding. The thought actually haunted me throughout the day. I didn’t mean to be annoying I just wanted you to know if you were paying attention. I am very truly sorry. Would you please forgive me?
Forgiven. 👍 I may have gotten a bit miffed too easily as well. Sometimes I’m known to take things too personally. So I ask for your forgiveness as well.
 
. Roman Catholics often make this false claim about their Church being the first Christian Church but it is simply a lie. There are college courses available for the history of the Christian Church and most histories will agree that the Catholic (universal) Christian era began in 70 AD as a result of the Romans destroying Jerusalem. This event caused what is known as the “Great Diaspora” (dispersion) because the Jews of Jerusalem were dispersed as refugees through out Europe (Roman Empire). Many of these Jews took the Christian message of the Gospel with them and in time the message of salvation was made manifest to a great portion of the Roman Empire. This period of history is referred to as the “Age of Catholic Christianity” however the Christian Church was not yet at this time named “catholic”. The reason the period is called the “Age of Catholic Christianity” is because the refugees coming from Jerusalem and the Apostles spread the message throughout the known universe. In a sense catholic Christianity was a simple development of Jesus’ plans and Paul’ efforts. History calls the era between 70 and 312 AD the “catholic Christian era” but the actual name “Catholic’ would not appear until 107 AD when Ignatious wrote “Wherever Jesus Christ is there is the Catholic church”. By the end of the second century the term ‘catholic’ was widely used of the church in the sense that the Catholic church was both universal, in contrast to local congregations, and orthodox, in contrast to heretical groups. The establishment of the Roman Catholic Church occurred much later in the history of the church. In 325 Constantine called a meeting of all the bishops in his empire to convene in Nicea. Christianity had become a mix mash of pagan rituals and Christian truths so the emperor wanted the bishops to establish exactly what Christianity believed. They worked long and hard and there fruits are recorded for us as the original Nicene Creed of 325.
· I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit.
The rest of this creed as we know it would not appear until 381 AD.
 
. Roman Catholics often make this false claim about their Church being the first Christian Church but it is simply a lie. There are college courses available for the history of the Christian Church and most histories will agree that the Catholic (universal) Christian era began in 70 AD as a result of the Romans destroying Jerusalem.
Although I too don’t believe that the first church was the Catholic one, the mere fact that someone is teaching something doesn’t mean it is right. So just because there are ‘courses’ you can study doesn’t automatically mean that they are right. The logic of your objection here is therefore flawed.
This event caused what is known as the “Great Diaspora” (dispersion) because the Jews of Jerusalem were dispersed as refugees through out Europe (Roman Empire).
this ignores the fact that Christian communities were already established in other cities regardless of the Diaspora, the church was out in the Empire.
but the actual name “Catholic’ would not appear until 107 AD when Ignatious wrote “Wherever Jesus Christ is there is the Catholic church”.
This is partly true insofar as half a quote is, to me a misquote.
"Chapter VIII.-Let Nothing Be Done Without the Bishop.

See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid"
Ignatius “The Epistle of Ignatius to the Smyrnaeans”
ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-01/anf01-21.htm#P2123_357530

You are therefore ignoring the ‘church structure’ of the quote. We Orthodox maintain that this is the way the church should be. All churches headed by a bishop, and in communion with each other are Catholic - no bishop head of any other bishop.
By the end of the second century the term ‘catholic’ was widely used of the church in the sense that the Catholic church was both universal, in contrast to local congregations, and orthodox, in contrast to heretical groups. The establishment of the Roman Catholic Church occurred much later in the history of the church. In 325 Constantine called a meeting of all the bishops in his empire to convene in Nicea. Christianity had become a mix mash of pagan rituals and Christian truths so the emperor wanted the bishops to establish exactly what Christianity believed. They worked long and hard and there fruits are recorded for us as the original Nicene Creed of 325.
What innovations did Constantine add? Which are the pagan rituals?
· I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit.
The rest of this creed as we know it would not appear until 381 AD.
What’s your point about this?
 
Not at all. Your statement here confirms it.

I’m not Catholic, so it’s irrelevant.

But, thanks for not answering my question, anyway.
Well, it would be relevant if you were looking for explanations of why people keep Sunday. In this doctrine, and the reasons thereof, Catholics, and most Protestants are totally united. Therefore, I thought you would be interested to read that part of the Catechism.

Sorry I didn’t answer your question; I have lost track of what it actually was. If it is what day I worship; that would have to be another thread/topic as I want to try and stay on track with each topic. If you decide to start a topic about that, just send me a PM to let me know.

In regards to this topic, re Protestants who favor the Reformation; may i ask you what your understanding of the reformation is? I am just looking for a brief explanation for now. Can you explain what the reformation was, and when it took place and what your sources are for this info?

I like to hear what different people say on the subject. Also, what do you think of the Catholic position that has so far been put forth here?

Thanks, from
David
 
Well, it would be relevant if you were looking for explanations of why people keep Sunday.
No it wouldn’t. We Orthodox worship on a Sunday without reference to the Catholic catechism.
In this doctrine, and the reasons thereof, Catholics, and most Protestants are totally united. Therefore, I thought you would be interested to read that part of the Catechism.
Are you now arguing that Protestants follow this practice because Catholics do? Man you come up with some confusing concepts.

Secondly, as you’re so dead-set on being a ‘sola scriptura’ Christian, quote me the Bible verses that say we should worship on a Sunday.
Sorry I didn’t answer your question; I have lost track of what it actually was. If it is what day I worship; that would have to be another thread/topic as I want to try and stay on track with each topic. If you decide to start a topic about that, just send me a PM to let me know.
It’s totally relevant for reasons above.
In regards to this topic, re Protestants who favor the Reformation; may i ask you what your understanding of the reformation is? I am just looking for a brief explanation for now. Can you explain what the reformation was, and when it took place and what your sources are for this info?
The Reformation was the process by which Luther separated himself from the Catholic Church by posing as a reformer of it.
 
No it wouldn’t. We Orthodox worship on a Sunday without reference to the Catholic catechism.

Are you now arguing that Protestants follow this practice because Catholics do? Man you come up with some confusing concepts.

Secondly, as you’re so dead-set on being a ‘sola scriptura’ Christian, quote me the Bible verses that say we should worship on a Sunday.

It’s totally relevant for reasons above.

The Reformation was the process by which Luther separated himself from the Catholic Church by posing as a reformer of it.
Thanks. I can understand your answers here better now. I did not realize that “Orthodox” Christians made no reference to the Catechism. can you fill me in a little on your denomination? I am always interested to learn new things like this.

What I was saying re Sunday worship was the fact that both Protestants and Catholics do indeed worship on Sundays, and both give the same or similar reasons for doing so. It seems too, that there are almost always a few exceptions. But by and large, Protestants, for whatever reasons, seem to follow the leading of Catholics on the Sunday worship. Protestants did not initially start Sunday worship, it was the Catholic Church.

I would be very interested to hear why your church keeps Sunday; if your reasons for same are different than what is in the Catechism. Thanks for bearing with all my questions/comments. I know some of them may seem strange; but, as long as we can exchange notes here like this; I am happy to listen to others too.🙂
 
Thanks. I can understand your answers here better now. I did not realize that “Orthodox” Christians made no reference to the Catechism. can you fill me in a little on your denomination? I am always interested to learn new things like this.
I am an Orthodox Christian. No doubt you’ve heard of “Greek Orthodox”, “Russian Orthodox”. We are all part of the Orthodox Church. If you want to know which administraive group I belong to, then I’m Antiochian Orthodox.
What I was saying re Sunday worship was the fact that both Protestants and Catholics do indeed worship on Sundays, and both give the same or similar reasons for doing so. It seems too, that there are almost always a few exceptions. But by and large, Protestants, for whatever reasons, seem to follow the leading of Catholics on the Sunday worship. Protestants did not initially start Sunday worship, it was the Catholic Church.
I would be very interested to hear why your church keeps Sunday; if your reasons for same are different than what is in the Catechism. Thanks for bearing with all my questions/comments. I know some of them may seem strange; but, as long as we can exchange notes here like this; I am happy to listen to others too.
We are, arguably, the oldest Christian church. Catholics would of course argue the same. But I find it odd that one who champions a ‘bible only’ approach admitting to following non-biblical ways.
 
I am an Orthodox Christian. No doubt you’ve heard of “Greek Orthodox”, “Russian Orthodox”. We are all part of the Orthodox Church. If you want to know which administraive group I belong to, then I’m Antiochian Orthodox.

We are, arguably, the oldest Christian church. Catholics would of course argue the same. But I find it odd that one who champions a ‘bible only’ approach admitting to following non-biblical ways.
I have looked up some info on your Church at Why I Became An Orthodox Christian

In an article entitled “WHY I BECAME AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN” Athanasius Yoo, M.D., B.D. states that Orthodox Christians oppose the following doctrines of Catholicism:
  1. The withdrawal of the cup from the laity during Communion.
    1. The Doctrine of the Infallibility of the Pope.
    2. The Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.
    3. The Doctrine of Purgatory.
    4. The Doctrine of Indulgences.
    5. The universal jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome.
    6. The exclusive Latinity in the Mass and in other services.
Given the title of this thread; I am wondering how much Catholics might class the Orthodox Tradition as a part of the Reformation? I know that Protestantism does have some things in opposition to the Orthodox Tradition; but we also, in common, oppose certain teachings.

I actually have difficulty understanding the connections of Orthodox to Catholics. The Orthodox articles I have read seem like they are Catholic by the way they are worded, in many cases.

I believe though that you would give the same or similar reasons for Sunday-keeping, as do Catholics. I started another topic here entitled “Which Day Is The Sabbath?” Maybe you could meet me over there and give us your reasons in favor of Sunday?

Also, I am interested in seeing proof that the Orthodox Church is the oldest. Or, that the Catholic Church is. 🙂 Which Church is really the oldest?

Protestants In Favor Of The Reformation will be all mixed up; I am sure, until we know which church to join!! 👍
 
I feel the Fullness of Gods Truth when I hold his beloved Son in my hands and then follow his admonition to eat HIS body and drink His blood.

The only reason you have a Biible to seek the fullness in truth in is becuase of the Catholic Cburch. It was the One True Church. the Church founded by Jesus himself that set the number of books-1100 hundred years before non-deniminational ,man made Church’s came about. Without the Church you will NEVER exerience anything but a pale shadow of the Truth. Come home-you have no idea of the joy you are missing.
“The fullness of Truth” would not be limited to just the act of eating a communion wafer/bread. It is a collective result of a number of sources; Jesus being the main One. (Jo.14:6). He is explicitly revealed to us in His Word. The Bible makes the declaration that “the fullness of the Godhead” is in Jesus Himself; and we can thankfully go to Him for our “fullness” as individuals, with or without communion.
Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top