Automatic Excommunication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter figarocat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

figarocat

Guest
In my theology (Roman Catholic) textbook, it says that a person can be automatically excommunicated for physically attacking the Pope. Is this correct? Why would it be an automatic excommunication for attacking the Pope, but not for a regular clergy member or layperson?
 
In my theology (Roman Catholic) textbook, it says that a person can be automatically excommunicated for physically attacking the Pope. Is this correct? Why would it be an automatic excommunication for attacking the Pope, but not for a regular clergy member or layperson?
You might find this informative. In addition to automatic excommunication of a person who is involved in an abortion, these other sins will have automatic excommunication. This is taken from “This Rock” magazine.
Yes. In the 1983 Code of Canon Law (CIC) eight other sins carry the penalty of automatic excommunication: apostasy, heresy, schism (CIC 1364:1), violating the sacred species (CIC 1367), physically attacking the pope (CIC 1370:1), sacramentally absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin (CIC 1378:1), consecrating a bishop without authorization (CIC 1382), and directly violating the seal of confession (1388:1).

Apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith. Heresy is the obstinate doubt or denial, after baptism, of a defined Catholic doctrine. Schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or the refusal to be in communion with members of the Church who are in communion with him (CIC 751).

Violation of the sacred species is the throwing away the consecrated species of Christ’s body or blood or the taking or retaining of them for a sacrilegious purpose (CIC 1367).

Physically attacking the pope is self-explanatory, as are absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin and consecrating a bishop without authorization from the Vatican.

A direct violation of the seal of confession is one in which both the penitent and the penitent’s sin can easily be determined by the confessor’s words or behavior. Again, the penalty of automatic excommunication does not apply if no one perceives the disclosure (CIC 1330).

Automatic excommunication for abortion (CIC 1398) applies not only to the woman who has the abortion, but to “all those who commit this crime with knowledge of the penalty attached, and [this] includes those accomplices without whose help the crime would not have been committed” (Evangelium Vitae 62).

No one is automatically excommunicated for any offense if, without any fault of his own, he was unaware that he was violating a law (CIC 1323:2) or that a penalty was attached to the law (CIC 1324:1:9). The same applies if one was a minor, had the imperfect use of reason, was forced through grave or relatively grave fear, was forced through serious inconvenience, or in certain other circumstances (CIC 1324).

 
In my theology (Roman Catholic) textbook, it says that a person can be automatically excommunicated for physically attacking the Pope. Is this correct? Why would it be an automatic excommunication for attacking the Pope, but not for a regular clergy member or layperson?
The Code of Canon Law provides as follows:
Can. 1370 §1. A person who uses physical force against the Roman Pontiff incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; if he is a cleric, another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state, can be added according to the gravity of the delict.

§2. A person who does this against a bishop incurs a latae sententiae interdict and, if he is a cleric, also a latae sententiae suspension.

§3. A person who uses physical force against a cleric or religious out of contempt for the faith, the Church, ecclesiastical power, or the ministry is to be punished with a just penalty.
The reason for the gradation is that violence against the pope is a crime that threatens the Church itself, while violence against a layperson is not. Please note that it is still a sin to commit violence against an average person, just as it is against the pope, but that’s not the subject matter of the canon law.
 
You might find this informative. In addition to automatic excommunication of a person who is involved in an abortion, these other sins will have automatic excommunication. This is taken from “This Rock” magazine.
Yes. In the 1983 Code of Canon Law (CIC) eight other sins carry the penalty of automatic excommunication: apostasy, heresy, schism (CIC 1364:1), violating the sacred species (CIC 1367), physically attacking the pope (CIC 1370:1), sacramentally absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin (CIC 1378:1), consecrating a bishop without authorization (CIC 1382), and directly violating the seal of confession (1388:1).

Apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith. Heresy is the obstinate doubt or denial, after baptism, of a defined Catholic doctrine. Schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or the refusal to be in communion with members of the Church who are in communion with him (CIC 751).

Violation of the sacred species is the throwing away the consecrated species of Christ’s body or blood or the taking or retaining of them for a sacrilegious purpose (CIC 1367).

Physically attacking the pope is self-explanatory, as are absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin and consecrating a bishop without authorization from the Vatican.

A direct violation of the seal of confession is one in which both the penitent and the penitent’s sin can easily be determined by the confessor’s words or behavior. Again, the penalty of automatic excommunication does not apply if no one perceives the disclosure (CIC 1330).

Automatic excommunication for abortion (CIC 1398) applies not only to the woman who has the abortion, but to “all those who commit this crime with knowledge of the penalty attached, and [this] includes those accomplices without whose help the crime would not have been committed” (Evangelium Vitae 62).

No one is automatically excommunicated for any offense if, without any fault of his own, he was unaware that he was violating a law (CIC 1323:2) or that a penalty was attached to the law (CIC 1324:1:9). The same applies if one was a minor, had the imperfect use of reason, was forced through grave or relatively grave fear, was forced through serious inconvenience, or in certain other circumstances (CIC 1324).

Heresy results in automatic excommunication? If one were to confess past heresies to a priest in a confessional would said excommunication be lifted or would you have to go to a bishop or Rome itself?
 
Interesting academic discussion on Canon Law. Looking at this practically, would the woman who attacked Pope Benedict in St. Peter’s on Christmas Eve 2009 have been excommunicated latae sententiae?
 
No the man was insane. however can the excommunication from heresy be lifted in Confessions?
 
No the man was insane. however can the excommunication from heresy be lifted in Confessions?
I am not certain, however is it possible for an excommunicated individual to go to Confession? Plus, what Priest in their right mind would absolve someone who is excommunicated (if the first question was answered yes)? I say this because how would a Priest know one is excommunicated unless one tells the Priest.

I repeat, I am not certain, though it seems like murky waters.

~ Pius :knight1:
 
I am not certain, however is it possible for an excommunicated individual to go to Confession? Plus, what Priest in their right mind would absolve someone who is excommunicated (if the first question was answered yes)? I say this because how would a Priest know one is excommunicated unless one tells the Priest.

I repeat, I am not certain, though it seems like murky waters.

~ Pius :knight1:
An excommunicated person may go to Confession. Now its just a matter if the priest is authorized to lift the excommunication himself or need to refer the matter to the bishop or some other authority.
 
I am not certain, however is it possible for an excommunicated individual to go to Confession? Plus, what Priest in their right mind would absolve someone who is excommunicated (if the first question was answered yes)? I say this because how would a Priest know one is excommunicated unless one tells the Priest.

I repeat, I am not certain, though it seems like murky waters.

~ Pius :knight1:
Can somebody please ask a priest (or if one is a priest) or bishop and post an answer. I was never catechized (is that the right word?) and when I was 12 had an un orthodox view of The Trinity, the nature of God (kind of "new age) and I feel that my choice in literature and movies (Harry Potter mostly) glorified the occult and gave me a short lived interest in astrology (never attempted to do any of this myself), palm reading and I have always had an interest in Roman, Greek, Egyptian, and Nordic mythology (pagan lore). Then I thought a feng shui frog (money one) worked and put the coin that came with it in the bloody frogs mouth. I changed about 3 years ago and repented after I learned the nature of the Trinity and have since confessed this. When I actually learned Church teaching I embraced it and became this Traditionalist Catholic and as some say religious extremeist who is now typing this. Am I a heretic, am I (or was I) ever excommunicated?
 
Also I should probably note that I was always a Christian and loved Bible stories though I did kind of start disliking Church after a bad experience at the Catholic Church attached to this school. Incidently I love the Mass now.
 
Can somebody please ask a priest (or if one is a priest) or bishop and post an answer. I was never catechized (is that the right word?) and when I was 12 had an un orthodox view of The Trinity, the nature of God (kind of "new age) and I feel that my choice in literature and movies (Harry Potter mostly) glorified the occult and gave me a short lived interest in astrology (never attempted to do any of this myself), palm reading and I have always had an interest in Roman, Greek, Egyptian, and Nordic mythology (pagan lore). Then I thought a feng shui frog (money one) worked and put the coin that came with it in the bloody frogs mouth. I changed about 3 years ago and repented after I learned the nature of the Trinity and have since confessed this. When I actually learned Church teaching I embraced it and became this Traditionalist Catholic and as some say religious extremeist who is now typing this. Am I a heretic, am I (or was I) ever excommunicated?
Did you actually subscribed to another faith? Apostasy from the faith carries excommunication. But confession will often lift this and I believe most priests have the faculties to restore Catholics into the Church. I am just unsure really how apostasy is defined, but I would guess that unless you pulicly joined another faith, heretical views isn’t apostasy. A sin nonetheless, but you did not apostasize from the faith.
 
Did you actually subscribed to another faith? Apostasy from the faith carries excommunication. But confession will often lift this and I believe most priests have the faculties to restore Catholics into the Church. I am just unsure really how apostasy is defined, but I would guess that unless you pulicly joined another faith, heretical views isn’t apostasy. A sin nonetheless, but you did not apostasize from the faith.
No, I never joined any other religion. Even then I loved Bible stories and Jesus while hating satan. like I said when I learned Church teaching I embraced it. It’s sad to say that here in St. john’s Nl, Apostacy is even more common than heresy. And a great many “Christians” are heretics. let me give you examples:

Jesus already died on the cross. We can live how we want
I believe in my Christian God but other “gods” exist and every faith has teir own “heaven”
I don’t want to go into too much detail on this one but they denied The Belssed Virgin Mary’s well virginity. Apparently the vigin birth of Christ is imossible.

i know I’m not exactly in a good position to judge, but when I try to politely (always respecting others beliefs) to refute these heresies, it comes to a point where people just call me things like extremeist, closed minded (for not accepting their “god(s)” or not denying the existence of God) when they asked me about Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus or racist because I don’t think (insert religion here) is the true faith or brings salvation.
 
Heresy results in automatic excommunication? If one were to confess past heresies to a priest in a confessional would said excommunication be lifted or would you have to go to a bishop or Rome itself?
Since it’s not reserved to the Bishop nor the Apostolic See, confessing it and by act of will refusing to further hold it should lift the excommunication inherent to being a heretic.
 
Since it’s not reserved to the Bishop nor the Apostolic See, confessing it and by act of will refusing to further hold it should lift the excommunication inherent to being a heretic.
Does heresy carry automatic excommunication?
 
I am not certain, however is it possible for an excommunicated individual to go to Confession? Plus, what Priest in their right mind would absolve someone who is excommunicated (if the first question was answered yes)? I say this because how would a Priest know one is excommunicated unless one tells the Priest.

I repeat, I am not certain, though it seems like murky waters.

~ Pius :knight1:
Excommunication can be forgiven in confession unless the lifting of the excommunication is reserved to some ecclesiastical authority, e.g. the Pope. We need to remember excommunication is a medicinal penalty not a punitive one.
 
Does heresy carry automatic excommunication?
Yes, it does, in the Roman Church.

CIC: Can. 1364 §1. Without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 194, §1, n. 2, an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication; in addition, a cleric can be punished with the penalties mentioned in ⇒ can. 1336, §1, nn. 1, 2, and 3.

§2. If contumacy of long duration or the gravity of scandal demands it, other penalties can be added, including dismissal from the clerical state.

(vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P52.HTM)

In the East, however, the CCEO indicates no automatic excommunication, but instead mandatory excommunication. (But note that, after hearing from the offender, he who can issue the excommunication can also revoke it.)

The gravity of the offense is the same, tho’.

CCEO:Canon 1436
  1. One who denies a truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or who calls it into doubt, or who totally repudiates the Christian faith, and does not retract it after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished as a heretic or an apostate with a major excommunication; a cleric moreover can be punished with other penalties, not excluding deposition.
  2. In addition to these cases, whoever professes a doctrine that has been condemned as erroneous by the Roman Pontiff or the college of bishops exercising the authentic magisterium, and does not retract it after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished with an appropriate penalty.
Canon 1437

One who refuses subjection to the supreme authority of the Church, or who subject to it refuses communion with the Christian faithful, though legitimately admonished does not obey, is to be punished as a schismatic with a major excommunication.
 
I thought a heretic would be given a chance to be corrected, and thus would mean the excommunication would happen by declaration instead of automatic.

So if a priest during homily says he thinks women should be ordained, would that mean he’s excommunicated right there and then? And would that invalidate the Mass?
 
I thought a heretic would be given a chance to be corrected, and thus would mean the excommunication would happen by declaration instead of automatic.
In the Roman Church, no, it’s automatic.

In the eastern churches, yes, it requires action by the bishop.
So if a priest during homily says he thinks women should be ordained, would that mean he’s excommunicated right there and then?
In a Latin Parish, Yes. Preaching heresy is, in the west, automatic.
And would that invalidate the Mass?
No. But it makes it a grave sin for the priest… but preaching heresy is, too…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top