T
thistle
Guest
Am I allowed to be a God father to my step-daughter’s son, i.e. my step-grandson?
If you are Catholic and he is Catholic and you meet all of the following criteria, then yes:Am I allowed to be a God father to my step-daughter’s son, i.e. my step-grandson?
I see your point, but…Can. 873 One sponsor, male or female, is sufficient; but there may be two, one of each sex.
It does not say: there may be more than two!
It does used the term Sponsor in this canon. However many other official texts like the Rite of Baptism itself use the term “Godparent”
Is this true? If it is, does anyone know why?Canon Law does not… allow a Catholic to be a Godparent at a Non-Catholic Baptism.
Yes, this is true. Look at the role of a sponsor. A Catholic cannot promise to instruct a child in a faith that is not the Catholic faith. For example, a godparent at a Lutheran baptism cannot profess to believe what Lutherans believe nor can they promise to teach the child the Lutheran faith.Is this true? If it is, does anyone know why?
They can still be a model of Christian virtue, they can be supportive of the child’s faith life, but they cannot participate in things like Lutheran communion or teach them things that are contrary to the Catholic faith.Also, what if someone has already been made the godparent of a family member, say a much younger sibling or a nephew or niece, in a Protestant church, and sometime later converts to the Catholic faith?
No. The Catholic could be a witness to the baptism but not a Godparent.Or say that a young convert is asked by her mother to be a godparent for her youngest sister at a non-Catholic baptism, would that be allowed?
Except the role of godparent is more than that. A Catholic cannot teach a non-Catholic child the faith that the child is a member of, nor would the parents likely appreciate the Catholic godparent sending their kid tracts from Catholic answers on why they should convert to Catholicism.I would think that it would be a good thing, you know? Because then that older sister would be given the chance to be a living testimony, in a very special way, to that young child.
There is no prohibition on you attending the baptism, or sharing your faith with the child. But, the role of Godparent belongs to someone who shares the same denomination. You can absolutely be a Christian witness to their baptism.I mean, I’m already doing everything I can to show my younger siblings just how much the Church has come to mean in my life… but I can’t attend their baptisms (if my mother ever actually gets around to doing it) or stand in as a godparent?
that is why parents in general need to state exactly what their wishes are when they die with minor kids at home!In any case the role of Godparent is greatly deminished in the western world, the US at least, because even if you state in your will that the kids should go to the Godparent(s), if they are not family members there is an excellent chance the court would award them to the closest relative if they wanted them and that relative may or may not raise them Catholic. Even if you had uncles and aunts as Godparents if the grandparents wanted the kids the courts would probably give them to them.
Totally off subject but what do you mean in your signature “Proud to be a toe-tag”? In my world a toe-tag was what we put on corpses in the morgue when I was in the service.that is why parents in general need to state exactly what their wishes are when they die with minor kids at home!
Actually it’s in the documents of Vatican II and the documents that followed on Ecumenism.Is this true? If it is, does anyone know why?
Also, what if someone has already been made the godparent of a family member, say a much younger sibling or a nephew or niece, in a Protestant church, and sometime later converts to the Catholic faith?
Or say that a young convert is asked by her mother to be a godparent for her youngest sister at a non-Catholic baptism, would that be allowed?
I would think that it would be a good thing, you know? Because then that older sister would be given the chance to be a living testimony, in a very special way, to that young child.
I mean, I’m already doing everything I can to show my younger siblings just how much the Church has come to mean in my life… but I can’t attend their baptisms (if my mother ever actually gets around to doing it) or stand in as a godparent?
Saoirse
Rite of Baptism, Rite of Confirmation, Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, Canon Law.I see your point, but…
I mean afterall, this is what 90% of Americans think Godparents are anyway
- Can anyone be an “unofficial” Godparent? In other words, can I have two “valid” sponsors who are the “official” Godparents according to the baptismal certificate, but also have another “witnesses” whom we call the child’s “Godparent” on an affectionate Christian level…you know, a “special aunt” who is also present at the Baptism in every other way?
, so I don’t think they really care “who’s on the certificate.” Question is, are we doing anything wrong according to the eyes of the Church by simply calling the “witness” a Godparent?
- Where can I find that term Godparent being used in official text (you mentioned the “Rite of Baptism.”)? Or used interchangeably with the title “sponsor?”
![]()
Yes, Grandparents may be Godparents of their Grandchildren.Am I allowed to be a God father to my step-daughter’s son, i.e. my step-grandson?
I do not believe that the role of godparents is in any way “diminished” as you assert, especially not for the reasons you give.In any case the role of Godparent is greatly deminished in the western world, the US at least, because even if you state in your will that the kids should go to the Godparent(s), if they are not family members there is an excellent chance the court would award them to the closest relative if they wanted them and that relative may or may not raise them Catholic. Even if you had uncles and aunts as Godparents if the grandparents wanted the kids the courts would probably give them to them.
Long story Lance…has nothing to do with the "dead"I can promise you thatTotally off subject but what do you mean in your signature “Proud to be a toe-tag”? In my world a toe-tag was what we put on corpses in the morgue when I was in the service.
If the guardian decides to bring them up as Protestant, Jewish, Hindu or what ever the Godparent(s) can do nothing about it. If the Godparent is a non-relative and the guardian decides to cut off all contact there is nothing the Godparent can do about it. It is much more important to choose who gets the kids a guardian and make sure it will be upheld in court than who you pick as Godparent(s).I do not believe that the role of godparents is in any way “diminished” as you assert, especially not for the reasons you give.
If there is any “diminished” role of sponsors it is because of many parents who see baptism as a cultural milestone rather than a religious one. Parents who fail to understand the role of sponsor often choose inappropriate sponsor. All of the pracitcing Catholics I know have chosen appropriate sponsors for their children who are very involved in their spiritual lives.
The scenario in which both parents die and leave a minor child behind is microscopic compared to the number of families with minor children in general. Nor is it relevant to selecting godparents. No where in Catholic canon law nor in the tradition of the church is the “sponsor” synonymous with “legal guardian in the case of parental demise”.
If parents properly establish a guardianship plan for their children in accord with the laws of their state then those wishes will be carried out upon their deaths regardless of whether they select relatives or non-relatives.
Being a godparent has nothing to do with taking guardianship of children in the case of parental death.
Sorry, Rich, I guess I don’t understand…were you trying to answer my questions here? Canon Law speaks to a “sponsor,” not a “Godparent.”Rite of Baptism, Rite of Confirmation, Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, Canon Law.
Yes I was trying to simply list a few documents that reference Sponsor or Godparent or both.Sorry, Rich, I guess I don’t understand…were you trying to answer my questions here? Canon Law speaks to a “sponsor,” not a “Godparent.”
More importantly, I wanted to know this…
- Can anyone be an “unofficial” Godparent? In other words, can I have two “valid” sponsors who are the “official” Godparents according to the baptismal certificate, but also have another “witnesses” whom we call the child’s “Godparent” on an affectionate Christian level…you know, a “special aunt” who is also present at the Baptism in every other way?