Baptism (immersed in water) is necessary

  • Thread starter Thread starter postwriter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ngakk! What does that answer trying to say?
In mathematics, a transitive relationship occurs when the following are equivalent.
For instance, A = B and B = C, then also A = C.

What I was pointing out, through the use of a transitive relationship, is that the Holy Spirit is present in the child, in the womb.

btw, the word disciple means Mathetes (math-ay-tes) – a learner.
 
Originally Posted by Church Militant View Post
Can you provide any scriptural support for that belief, specifically, that (Baptism of the Holy Spirit and Fire) occurs in the womb?

In mathematics, a transitive relationship occurs when the following are equivalent.
For instance, A = B and B = C, then also A = C.

What I was pointing out, through the use of a transitive relationship, is that the Holy Spirit is present in the child, in the womb.

btw, the word disciple means Mathetes (math-ay-tes) – a learner.
Yes, in mathematics there is that so-called transitive relationship. But how is that mathematical relationship applicable to the question raised by Church Militant? Are you trying to say that:
“Holy Spirit = A learner”?
 
I believe water baptism is an evolution of the Jewish Proselyte Baptism.

By that I mean,** water baptism is a public demonstration of ones desire to belong to a Christian\Catholic community.**
Now that this thread has drifted to page 3, I can assume that my statement is widely accepted by all that have participated.

In conclusion, to answer the original question, ‘is immersion into water baptism necessary’?

My answer remains, as it has from the beginning, no.
 
No offense there tabcom, but I think I will stick with what the church has always taught on this one.

The Didache

After the foregoing instructions, baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living [running] water. If you have no living water, then baptize in other water, and if you are not able in cold, then in warm. If you have neither, pour water three times on the head, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Before baptism, let the one baptizing and the one to be baptized fast, as also any others who are able. Command the one who is to be baptized to fast beforehand for one or two days (Didache 7:1 [ca. A.D. 70]).

Hermas

“‘I have heard, sir,’ said I [to the Shepherd], ‘from some teacher, that there is no other repentance except that which took place when we went down into the water and obtained the remission of our former sins.’ He said to me, ‘You have heard rightly, for so it is’” (The Shepherd 4:3:1–2 [A.D. 80]).

Justin Martyr

As many as are persuaded and believe that what we [Christians] teach and say is true, and undertake to be able to live accordingly, and instructed to pray and to entreat God with fasting, for the remission of their sins that are past, we pray and fast with them. Then they are brought by us where there is water and are regenerated in the same manner in which we were ourselves regenerated. For, in the name of God, the Father… and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit [Matt. 28:19], they then receive the washing with water. For Christ also said, “Unless you are born again, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven” (First Apology 61 [A.D. 151]).

Irenaeus

He [Jesus] came to save all through himself – all, I say, who through him are reborn in God; infants, and children, and youths, and old men. Therefore he passed through every age, becoming an infant for infants, sanctifying infants; a child for children, sanctifying those who are of that age . . . [so that] he might be the perfect teacher in all things, perfect not only in respect to the setting forth of truth, perfect also in respect to relative age (Against Heresies 2:22:4 [A.D. 189]).

Tertullian

“Happy is our sacrament of water, in that, by washing away the sins of our early blindness, we are set free and admitted into eternal life. . . . [But] a viper of the [Gnostic] Cainite heresy, lately conversant in this quarter, has carried away a great number with her most venomous doctrine, making it her first aim to destroy baptism—which is quite in accordance with nature, for vipers and asps . . . themselves generally do live in arid and waterless places. But we, little fishes after the example of our [Great] Fish, Jesus Christ, are born in water, nor have we safety in any other way than by permanently abiding in water. So that most monstrous creature, who had no right to teach even sound doctrine, knew full well how to kill the little fishes—by taking them away from the water!” (Baptism 1 [A.D. 203]).

[N]o one can attain salvation without baptism, especially in view of the declaration of the Lord, who says, “Unless a man shall be born of water, he shall not have life” (On Baptism 12:1 [A.D. 203]).

“We have, indeed, a second [baptismal] font which is one with the former [water baptism]: namely, that of blood, of which the Lord says: ‘I am to be baptized with a baptism’ [Luke 12:50], when he had already been baptized. He had come through water and blood, as John wrote [1 John 5:6], so that he might be baptized with water and glorified with blood. . . . This is the baptism which replaces that of the fountain, when it has not been received, and restores it when it has been lost” (ibid., 16).

When we are about to enter the water — no, just a little before — In the church and under the hand of the bishop, we solemnly profess that we renounce the devil and his pomps and his angels. Thereupon we are immersed three times (The Crown 3:2 [A.D. 211]).
 
Hippolytus

Where there is no scarcity of water the stream shall flow through the baptismal font or pour into it from above; but if water is scarce, whether on a constant condition or on occasion, then use whatever water is available. Let them remove their clothing. Baptize first the children, and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them (The Apostolic Tradition 21:16 [A.D.215]).

Recognitions of Clement

But you will perhaps say, ‘What does the baptism of water contribute toward the worship of God?’ In the first place, because that which has pleased God is fulfilled. In the second place, because when you are regenerated and born again of water and of God, the frailty of your former birth, which you have through men, is cut off, and so . . . you shall be able to attain salvation; but otherwise it is impossible. For thus has the true prophet [Jesus] testified to us with an oath: “Verily, I say to you, that unless a man is born again of water . . . he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Recognitions of Clement 6:9 [A.D. 221]).

Origen

The Church received from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants. The apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of divine sacraments, knew there is in everyone innate strains of [original] sin, which must be washed away through water and the Spirit (Commentaries on Romans 5:9 [A.D. 248]).

Cornelius I

As [the heretic Novatian] seemed about to die, he received baptism in the bed where he lay, by pouring. . . . (Letter to Fabius of Antioch 6:43 [A.D. 251]).

Cyprian

[l]t behooves those to be baptized . . . so that they are prepared, in the lawful and true and only baptism of the holy Church, by divine regeneration, for the kingdom of God . . . because it is written “Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God” (Epistles 72 [73]: 21 [A.D. 252]).

As to what pertains to the case of infants: You [Fidus] said that they ought not to be baptized within the second or third day after their birth, that the old law of circumcision must be taken into consideration, and that you did not think that one should be baptized and sanctified within the eighth day after his birth. In our council it seemed to us far otherwise. No one agreed to the course which you thought should be taken. Rather, we all judge that the mercy and grace of God ought to be denied to no man born" (Letters 64:2 [A.D. 253]).

In the saving sacraments, when necessity compels and when God bestows his pardon, divine benefits are bestowed fully upon believers, nor ought anyone be disturbed because the sick are poured upon or sprinkled when they receive the Lord’s grace" (Letter to a Certain Magnus 69(76):12 [A.D. 254]).
 
Cyril of Jerusalem

“If any man does not receive baptism, he does not have salvation. The only exception is the martyrs, who even without water will receive the kingdom.
. . . For the Savior calls martyrdom a baptism, saying, ‘Can you drink the cup which I drink and be baptized with the baptism with which I am to be baptized [Mark 10:38]?’ Indeed, the martyrs too confess, by being made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men [1 Cor. 4:9]” (Catechetical Lectures 3:10 [A.D. 350]).

Gregory Nazianz

“[Besides the baptisms associated with Moses, John, and Jesus] I know also a fourth baptism, that by martyrdom and blood, by which also Christ himself was baptized. This one is far more august than the others, since it cannot be defiled by later sins” (Oration on the Holy Lights 39:17 [A.D. 381]).

Pope Siricius

“It would tend to the ruin of our souls if, from our refusal of the saving font of baptism to those who seek it, any of them should depart this life and lose the kingdom and eternal life” (Letter to Himerius 3 [A.D. 385]).

John Chrysostom

“Do not be surprised that I call martyrdom a baptism, for here too the Spirit comes in great haste and there is the taking away of sins and a wonderful and marvelous cleansing of the soul, and just as those being baptized are washed in water, so too those being martyred are washed in their own blood” (Panegyric on St. Lucian 2 [A.D. 387]).

Ambrose

The Church was redeemed at the price of Christ’s blood. Jew or Greek, it makes no difference; but if he has believed, he must circumcise himself from his sins [in baptism (Col. 2:11-12)] so that he can be saved . . . for no one ascends into the kingdom of heaven except through the sacrament of baptism… “Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God” (On Abraham 2:11:79-84 [A.D. 387]).

Augustine

It is this one Spirit who makes it possible for an infant to be regenerated . . . when that infant is brought to baptism; and it is through this one Spirit that the infant so presented is reborn. For it is not written, “Unless a man be born again by the will of his parents” or “by the faith of those presenting him or ministering to him,” but, “Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit.” The water, therefore, manifesting exteriorly the sacrament of grace, and the Spirit effecting interiorly the benefit of grace, both regenerate in one Christ that man who was generated in Adam (Letters 98:2 [A.D. 408]).

Pope Leo I

“And because of the transgression of the first man, the whole stock of the human race was tainted; no one can be set free from the state of the old Adam save through Christ’s sacrament of baptism, in which there are no distinctions between the reborn, as the apostle [Paul] says, ‘For as many of you as were baptized in Christ did put on Christ; there is neither Jew nor Greek . . . ‘ [Gal. 3:27–28]” (Letters 15:10[11] [A.D. 445]).

Fulgentius of Ruspe

“From that time at which our Savior said, ‘If anyone is not reborn of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5], no one can, without the sacrament of baptism, except those who, in the Catholic Church, without baptism, pour out their blood for Christ, receive the kingdom of heaven and life eternal” (The Rule of Faith 43 [A.D. 524]).
 
Now that this thread has drifted to page 3, I can assume that my statement is widely accepted by all that have participated.

In conclusion, to answer the original question, ‘is immersion into water baptism necessary’?

My answer remains, as it has from the beginning, no.
Baptism is necessary.

Total immersion is not.

Is that what you are saying in the above quote?
 
No offense there tabcom, but I think I will stick with what the church has always taught on this one.
None taken.

When you say, ‘always taught’ . . .
The Didache

. . . Command the one who is to be baptized to fast beforehand for one or two days (Didache 7:1 [ca. A.D. 70]).
Do you still stick with fasting for one or two days before the baptism?
 
Baptism is necessary.
Total immersion is not.
Is that what you are saying in the above quote?
Yes, Baptism of the Holy Spirit is necessary.

What first got me curious about the ambiguity of the meaning of baptism was when I first read John the Baptist account of what kind of Baptism Jesus is going to bring in Mt 3:11 -
"As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Also, when I first read Eph 4:5 -
one Lord, one faith, one baptism,

OK, so I compiled a list that looks like this:
  1. There is only one baptism.
  2. John the Baptist says Jesus is going to Baptize in something other than water.
  3. That something other is the Holy Spirit.
    4, Conclusion, Baptism = Holy Spirit.
 
No offense there tabcom, but I think I will stick with what the church has always taught on this one.
With respects to the list you provided, in your own words, how does any of it refute what I stated.
By that I mean, water baptism is a public demonstration of ones desire to belong to a Christian\Catholic community.
 
Baptism is necessary.

Total immersion is not.

Is that what you are saying in the above quote?
No, no. Tabcom thinks that Christian baptism has NOTHING to do with water, and the reason that people get water baptized is because of arrogance and not understanding the Bible. He translated the relevant passages himself from the Greek, and says that Acts really should read “forbid water” to those who received the Spirit when Peter preached to them.
 
None taken.

When you say, ‘always taught’ . . .
Do you still stick with fasting for one or two days before the baptism?
It depends upon the Rite. Most of the Eastern Rites do, yes. However, all the Apostolic Churches have baptized infants since the beginning, and no one expects a baby to “fast”. those instructions are for adult converts.
 
With respects to the list you provided, in your own words, how does any of it refute what I stated.
At first, I believed water baptism was an empty ritual. I have now changed my opinion of it. I believe water baptism is an evolution of the Jewish Proselyte Baptism.

By that I mean,** water baptism is a public demonstration of ones desire to belong to a Christian\Catholic community.**

For some, that can be as good as any starting point for a lifetime commitment to serving God.
Certainly baptism is a public demonstration, but there is much more to it than that. It may well be an evolution of proselyte baptism. It washes away sins, and it is administered to infants because we are born with original sin. It is regenerative, in the sense that the HS enters the heart of the baptized, and dwells there, making the heart able to learn of God. If necessary, I suppose we can go through the fathers one by each on these matters.
 
Christ built a church, and that his church would be taught and guided by the Holy Spirit from generation to generation. His Church teaches and continues to practice baptism with water. The Church would not be doing that if it is not necessary. Mathew 3:11 could refer to another kind of baptism, and this may call for another thread.
 
Yes, Baptism of the Holy Spirit is necessary.

What first got me curious about the ambiguity of the meaning of baptism was when I first read John the Baptist account of what kind of Baptism Jesus is going to bring in Mt 3:11 -
"As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Also, when I first read Eph 4:5 -
one Lord, one faith, one baptism,

OK, so I compiled a list that looks like this:
  1. There is only one baptism.
  2. John the Baptist says Jesus is going to Baptize in something other than water.
  3. That something other is the Holy Spirit.
    4, Conclusion, Baptism = Holy Spirit.
Agreed. For Catholics the Holy Spirit comes WITH water baptism. This distinguishes Christian baptism from the Baptism of John. Is this “fire”? Yes. Christ came to “cast fire upon the earth” – That’s us.
 
For Catholics the Holy Spirit comes WITH water baptism.
Thank you for stating this as you did. I disagree because I believe it confuses the proselyte. By that I mean the proselyte is led to believe, falsely, that the act of being dipped in water is a switch that ‘turns on the Holy Spirit’ and now they are saved without having to do anything.

I believe the Holy Spirit’s presents is not subjected to the outwardly movement of, or sincere desire of the participant in water baptism. The Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a permanent change in the believer that precedes the believer’s desire to publicly be immersed in water.
 
Thank you for stating this as you did. I disagree because I believe it confuses the proselyte. By that I mean the proselyte is led to believe, falsely, that the act of being dipped in water is a switch that ‘turns on the Holy Spirit’ and now they are saved without having to do anything.
Keep studying your family history there, tabcom, and you will realize two things:
  1. Human beings are saved by grace, not “works” and salvation is not dependent on anything that we can “do”.
  2. Preparation for Baptism from the beginning until now has ALWAYS required preparation on the part of the candidate. This is what separates it from “empty ritual” or kids baptizing each other in the tub. When you read each instance of water baptism in the scripture, you can see that everyone is preceeded by the Word (gospel) being presented to the candidate, a confession of faith, and a commitment to Christ. Water baptism includes all these things.
I believe the Holy Spirit’s presents is not subjected to the outwardly movement of, or sincere desire of the participant in water baptism. The Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a permanent change in the believer that precedes the believer’s desire to publicly be immersed in water.
The HS is not “subjected” to humans, however, Jesus ordained that our participation in His spirit of fire would be accomplished in a certain manner. Note that He did not tell the Apostles to baptize unbelievers, but persons who had been made disciples. Sometimes the outpouring of the HS does occur before water, as it did in the case of the house of Cornelius, but the Apostles taught and modelled that the two should never be separated from each other. That is why Peter stated that water should not be forbidden to the Gentiles.

Indeed the Baptism of the HS does produce a permanent change. In Christian practice, this permanent change is united with water baptism.
 
Yes, Baptism of the Holy Spirit is necessary.

What first got me curious about the ambiguity of the meaning of baptism was when I first read John the Baptist account of what kind of Baptism Jesus is going to bring in Mt 3:11 -
"As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Also, when I first read Eph 4:5 -
one Lord, one faith, one baptism,

OK, so I compiled a list that looks like this:
  1. There is only one baptism.
  2. John the Baptist says Jesus is going to Baptize in something other than water.
  3. That something other is the Holy Spirit.
    4, Conclusion, Baptism = Holy Spirit.
amen! now we got someone on the right track.
 
Yes, Baptism of the Holy Spirit is necessary.

What first got me curious about the ambiguity of the meaning of baptism was when I first read John the Baptist account of what kind of Baptism Jesus is going to bring in Mt 3:11 -
"As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Also, when I first read Eph 4:5 -
one Lord, one faith, one baptism,

OK, so I compiled a list that looks like this:
  1. There is only one baptism.
  2. John the Baptist says Jesus is going to Baptize in something other than water.
  3. That something other is the Holy Spirit.
    4, Conclusion, Baptism = Holy Spirit.
tabcom,

2.“John the Baptist says Jesus is going to Baptize in something other that water.”

You are changing the text. John the Baptist says, "he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. John does not say how the Spirit and the fire will be communicated. John does not say “other than water”. Jesus does in Jn.3:5. We need to be careful not to read our personal views into the text.

Peace,
David
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top