Baptism in Jesus Name & Catholic Church is Only True Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baptised_in_Jes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t understand what you are getting at… are you saying that tongues are not of the Holy Ghost? or that this one girl faked it?

The bible specifically speaks to people speaking in tongues, prophesizing, healing, etc. through the Spirit. Please clarify your argument.
 
I don’t understand what you are getting at… are you saying that tongues are not of the Holy Ghost? or that this one girl faked it?

The bible specifically speaks to people speaking in tongues, prophesizing, healing, etc. through the Spirit. Please clarify your argument.
The speaking in tongues by Pentecostal isn’t the same one as in Act. I been to a Non-Denom which also have speaking in tongues, and most of it was just jibberish. It isn’t a language. I ask if that was Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, and other ancient language of the East, and it isn’t… so I doubt it is the real. It’s fake.
 
Goodness…I didn’t mean to start a war and name calling. I only expressed a truth/. I am offended by anyone or any church who says they know all truth. Jesus said He was the Truth. Jesus said nothing about many of the rituals of the Catholic Church.

You submitted a straw man argument when you said that Catholic church says it knows everything. I doesn’t ever nor has it ever said that it knows “everything.” Only God knows everything. The Catholic church says it has the “fullness of truth” given in divine revelation.
I happen to believe that Peter told believers on “The Day of Pentecost” they should be baptized “IN THE NAME OF JESUS” for the remission of sins.
 
What is it about the name of Jesus that you believe God would object to?

I pray for all who read this as Paul said before, “That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:” (Ephesians 1:17).

Outside References on the history of baptism:

BRITANICA ENCYCLOPEDIA

The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son &
Holy Ghost by the Catholic Church in the Second Century. – 11th Edit., Vol. 3, ppg. 365-366.

CANNEY ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION

The early church always baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until development of the Trinity
Doctrine in the Second Century.

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA

Here the Catholics acknowledged that baptism was changed by the Catholic Church. – Vol. 2,
pg. 263.

HASTINGS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION

Christian baptism was administered using the words, “in the name of Jesus.” – Vol. 2, pg. 377.
Baptism was always in the name of Lord Jesus until time of Justin Martyr when Triune formula
used. – Vol. 2, pg. 389. NAME was an ancient synonym for “person.” Payment was always made
in the name of some person referring to ownership. Therefore one being baptized in Jesus’
name became His personal property. “Ye are Christ’s.” – Vol. 2, pg. 377 on Acts 2:38.

Yahweh is defined in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance by number 3068 Yahovah yeh-ho-vaw’ from 01961; TWOT-484a; n pr dei AV-LORD 6510, GOD 4, JEHOVAH 4, variant 1; 6519 Jehovah =" the existing One" 1) the proper name of the one true God 1a) unpronounced except with the vowel pointings of 0136
I just check the Catholic Encyclopedia from newadvent.org the information your provided is no where to be found.

Jesus commanded his Apostles, to Baptize them, In the Name of the Father, And Of the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
 
The bible clearly speaks to us about tongues, “To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:” (1 Cor 12:10). So tongues is a spiritual gift.

It also tells us that those who speak in tongues speak unto God in an unknown tongue, so the tongue doesn’t need to be defined. “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.” (1 Cor 14:2) So sometimes it isn’t the purpose of a tongue to speak unto men but unto God. If God needs to speak unto men, he will have it interpreted.

I have no doubt that some people fake speaking in tongues, or even speak in tongues not of God. But to say that all tongues are fake or to turn away from tongues just based on a few people who may do it just to be seen or heard of men is closing the book on what God uses sometimes.

Tongues have their place in the church and the work of the church just as the other gifts spoken of in 1 Cor 12. Praying in tongues can also have our Spirit pray unto God when we don’t know how to pray or our prayers are weak.

“Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.” (Romans 8:26). So whether sometimes the Spirit speaks to God with or without sounds. Sometimes groanings comes forth that we ourselves don’t understand, but God can, since it is from His Spirit.

God Bless.
 
"I just check the Catholic Encyclopedia from newadvent.org the information your provided is no where to be found.

Jesus commanded his Apostles, to Baptize them, In the Name of the Father, And Of the Son, and the Holy Spirit"

I agree that He commanded them to do that, and that is exactly what they did… In the name of Jesus.

These were outside sources, I should have been more clear. I didn’t find them, but I found what other people had said they had found. Those aren’t the point anyway, it was the scriptures that matter. Above those is what God gave me. Through His Spirit and His understanding of the scriptures.

In Jesus,
Daniel.
 
The bible clearly speaks to us about tongues, “To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:” (1 Cor 12:10). So tongues is a spiritual gift.

It also tells us that those who speak in tongues speak unto God in an unknown tongue, so the tongue doesn’t need to be defined. “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.” (1 Cor 14:2) So sometimes it isn’t the purpose of a tongue to speak unto men but unto God. If God needs to speak unto men, he will have it interpreted.

I have no doubt that some people fake speaking in tongues, or even speak in tongues not of God. But to say that all tongues are fake or to turn away from tongues just based on a few people who may do it just to be seen or heard of men is closing the book on what God uses sometimes.

Tongues have their place in the church and the work of the church just as the other gifts spoken of in 1 Cor 12. Praying in tongues can also have our Spirit pray unto God when we don’t know how to pray or our prayers are weak.

“Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.” (Romans 8:26). So whether sometimes the Spirit speaks to God with or without sounds. Sometimes groanings comes forth that we ourselves don’t understand, but God can, since it is from His Spirit.

God Bless.
Your religions was founded in the 20th Century. The Catholic Church been there longer over, 2,000 yrs. I trust the Church. Onenessism (Jesus Only) also denies the Trinity. There is a heresy called Sabellanism, which denies it, and your Church is similiar to that ancient heresy as well as modalism.
Many people believe that the Oneness doctrine came into existence only in the early 20th century during the latter days of the Azusa Street Revival. Oneness historians, however, such as Dr. Curtis Ward, William Chalfant, Dr. Gary P. Reckart Sr., Dr. David Bernard, Dr. Marvin Arnold, and Thomas Weisser have gathered substantial evidence that they believe reveals there were Oneness believers long before the Azusa Street Revival that lead all the way to the beginning of the first century Christian church. Dr. Ward in particular has proposed the unorthodox view of an unbroken Church lineage in which the Pentecostal Church has succeeded in continual perpetuity throughout history. Other more moderate approaches teach there were bursts of unconnected Pentecostal revivals at different time periods.
There are no indications, however, that the pioneering Oneness Pentecostal figures in the early twentieth century were either guided or inspired by any of these prior sources including ancient Modalists such as Sabellius, Noetus or Praxeas. However, modern Oneness people often stress dependence solely upon God and the Bible for the formation of their doctrines, seeking guidance not from post-biblical writings of men, but from illumination by God upon the Bible. Post-biblical church history is deemed by Oneness people to be of interest, but not binding upon them for their doctrinal views. Thus, they are unorthodox in the literal sense of the word.[2]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneness_Pentecostal#_note-Oneness.Trinity.and.orthodoxy
 
My church is the church of Jesus Christ. “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18). I will follow His words and His lead in my life and no other doctrine will I trust. “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:8) I am baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, I am baptized in the name of Jesus, that name of which Jesus spoke of. “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” (Matthew 28:18-20) The apostles taught what things Jesus had taught them to observe.

“Your religions was founded in the 20th Century. The Catholic Church been there longer over, 2,000 yrs. I trust the Church.”

My religion was “founded” when God spoke this world into existence, I follow Christ. I have not spoken of a church, have I quoted anything but the bible, other than some of those outside references in which someone else had found, not myself. I do not deny the Trinity, I believe that God is one God, but exists in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, however I will not pretend to understand how He exists, if He wants me to understand it He will show me through His scripture and His Spirit.

“There is a heresy called Sabellanism, which denies it, and your Church is similiar to that ancient heresy as well as modalism.”

Again I don’t even know what you are talking about when you say my church. What I have told you and quoted is straight from the bible. Please point out scriptural points that I have made rather than a vague description of what Pentecostals believe, or what Onenessism believes. I have not eluded that I believe like either, nor do I really know all of what they believe. I have given you scripture, which is given from God.

However, I will say, that salvation comes from none other but Jesus Christ. Not me, you, your church, your pastor, preacher, pope… None other but Jesus. “Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” His name brings salvation.

The grace of God saves men. That Grace is Jesus Christ. What other grace is there that we could be saved?

I write so that God’s will shall be done. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

It doesn’t matter to me if you believe me for my sake, but for your sake that you would turn to Jesus and believe and follow Him, and not only what your church says but what He says.

God Bless,
Daniel.
 
Again I don’t even know what you are talking about when you say my church. What I have told you and quoted is straight from the bible. Please point out scriptural points that I have made rather than a vague description of what Pentecostals believe, or what Onenessism believes. I have not eluded that I believe like either, nor do I really know all of what they believe. I have given you scripture, which is given from God.
However, I will say, that salvation comes from none other but Jesus Christ. Not me, you, your church, your pastor, preacher, pope… None other but Jesus. “Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” His name brings salvation.
The grace of God saves men. That Grace is Jesus Christ. What other grace is there that we could be saved?
I write so that God’s will shall be done. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).
It doesn’t matter to me if you believe me for my sake, but for your sake that you would turn to Jesus and believe and follow Him, and not only what your church says but what He says.
God Bless,
Daniel.
I received Jesus during Mass in the Blessed Sacrament because as a Catholic I believe the Blessed Eucharist is Truly Jesus, His presence Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity is there. The Catholic Church honor and give adorations to the Blessed Lord Jesus Christ. Through his name, people are baptized, sins are forgiven, and demons are cast out.

The Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ and he built it upon Peter Matthew 16:18. I’m fine with being Catholic.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states regarding the Messiah.

430 Jesus means in Hebrew: “God saves.” At the annunciation, the angel Gabriel gave him the name Jesus as his proper name, which expresses both his identity and his mission. Since God alone can forgive sins, it is God who, in Jesus his eternal Son made man, “will save his people from their sins”.in Jesus, God recapitulates all of his history of salvation on behalf of men.

2466 In Jesus Christ, the whole of God’s truth has been made manifest. “Full of grace and truth,” he came as the “light of the world,” he is the Truth. “Whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness.” The disciple of Jesus continues in his word so as to know “the truth [that] will make you free” and that sanctifies. To follow Jesus is to live in “the Spirit of truth,” whom the Father sends in his name and who leads “into all the truth.” To his disciples Jesus teaches the unconditional love of truth: “Let what you say be simply ‘Yes or No.’”

Jesus also built a Church;

552 Simon Peter holds the first place in the college of the Twelve; Jesus entrusted a unique mission to him. Through a revelation from the Father, Peter had confessed: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Our Lord then declared to him: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.” Christ, the “living Stone”, thus assures his Church, built on Peter, of victory over the powers of death. Because of the faith he confessed Peter will remain the unshakable rock of the Church. His mission will be to keep this faith from every lapse and to strengthen his brothers in it.
 
I said nothing bad about being Catholic, or that you shouldn’t be, that is just a name people give themselves, just as Pentecostal, Baptists, Pharisee, etc. All that matters is that you follow Christ in every word and deed. Not what church we belong to or what pastor we sit under. Attending church and learning under a pastor is great, even biblical: “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.”(Hebrews 10:25). “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?” (Romans 10:14).

But the main thing is that we follow Jesus and study to show ourselves approved, not just what someone tells us, but to know it and know why we believe it from God. “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15). That we turn from all sin, and not continue in that sin, we as Christians (Christ’s followers) should have no sin in us. Just going to church is not enough. That day we stand before Christ in judgment we will be held accountable for all of our sins not covered and forgiven by him. We must Repent, be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for remission of sins, and we shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. But to do all that we must also believe on His wonderful name.

“Christ, the “living Stone”, thus assures his Church, built on Peter, of victory over the powers of death. Because of the faith he confessed Peter will remain the unshakable rock of the Church. His mission will be to keep this faith from every lapse and to strengthen his brothers in it.”

Seeing and realizing this, that Jesus gave Peter the keys to the kingdom, “And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matthew 16:19), then why not believe what Peter said in Acts 2:38 and that the apostles taught in many other places? To be baptized in Jesus’ name.

God Bless,
Daniel.
 
"“430 Jesus means in Hebrew: “God saves.” At the annunciation, the angel Gabriel gave him the name Jesus as his proper name, which expresses both his identity and his mission. Since God alone can forgive sins, it is God who, in Jesus his eternal Son made man, “will save his people from their sins”.in Jesus, God recapitulates all of his history of salvation on behalf of men”

Yeah, I agree, this pretty much explains, or restates, John 3:16. However, there is no salvation apart from Jesus. “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).

“2466 In Jesus Christ, the whole of God’s truth has been made manifest. “Full of grace and truth,” he came as the “light of the world,” he is the Truth. “Whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness.” The disciple of Jesus continues in his word so as to know “the truth [that] will make you free” and that sanctifies. To follow Jesus is to live in “the Spirit of truth,” whom the Father sends in his name and who leads “into all the truth.” To his disciples Jesus teaches the unconditional love of truth: “Let what you say be simply ‘Yes or No.’””

We must walk in truth, I agree, with this too, to come out of the darkness and out of sin. “…go and sin no more…” (John 8:11)."
 
Hello again,

First of all, I would like to apologize to both Manny and Drifter that I was not able to get back to you today. After I posted I was caught in a swarm of activity until just about ten minutes ago.

I would like to comment on the discussion you two are having on baptism concerning “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” (Matt. 28:19)
And also, Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” (Acts 2:38)

Just so you know what I am about, I am a follower of Christ. I have no membership with any certain denomination. For as Paul said, Now I say this, that each of you says, “I am of Paul,” or “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of Cephas,” (Peter) or “I am of Christ.”
He goes on to say in the next verse, "Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul (1Cor. 1:12-13)

And as Jesus prayed, “I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they may all be one, as you Father, are in Me, and I in you; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me.” (John 17: 20-21)

Which brings me to the original point. One says, We are to baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. And, the other says that we are to baptize in the name of Jesus.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that Drifter said somewhere (and I’m paraphrasing) that to baptize in the name of Jesus, is to baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
Now, that being said, is it not also true that when one baptizes in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit they are baptizing in the name of Jesus?
Code:
Jesus Himself said that he and the Father are one. And Jesus also said to His disciples, "It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper (Holy Spirit) will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you." (John 16:7)
This is the proof of the Holy Spirit also being present in Him...as it is written: "For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily." (Col.2:9)
Which as we know was the reason it was necessary for the disciples to tarry in Jerusalem to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.   Isn't the Trinity doctrine evident throughout the scriptures?
Yet, consider this, do you think that the reason we have so much trouble understanding the Oneness of the Holy Trinity is because we do not understand the Oneness of the body as Paul explains in (1Cor.12:12-20).
Isn’t he saying the same thing? Is it possible we do not understand it because we do not apply it? I mean, since we are so divided, how can we possibly understand Oneness?
Code:
When Jesus prayed, "I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they may all be one, as you Father, are in Me, and I in you; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me." 

Look at this: Since Jesus is in the Father, and the Father in Jesus, and the Holy Spirit indwells us...it is necessary in order for the Holy Trinity or Jesus' body to be manifested to the world that the body be one in Christ!  Again, "Is Christ divided? 

Just as the "Fullness of the Godhead dwelt in Jesus bodily" (or in His physical body); now,  when the Father and the Son and the and the Holy Spirit are One in the church, then Christ is manifested to the world!  "That the world may believe." Because as it stands right now the Godhead hasn't been completed on earth, because we are divided. thus the reason for the ineffectiveness of the body on earth.
Because in Ephesians Paul wrote: “till we all come to the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of Christ.” (Eph.4:13)
Code:
Do you realize that if we as the body were one, and exact representation of Christ Jesus (The Trinity) how the power of Christ to heal the sick, to open the eyes of the blind, and the ears of the deaf, to feed the multitudes would be possible? 

Just as the people flocked to Jesus when He was here on earth, they would flock to the church the body of Christ!  Not this denomination or that one...but they would pursue Christ just as they did when He was here on earth.

"Behold, I say to you, lift up your eyes and look at the fields, for they are already white for harvest" (John 5:35b)
Thanks be to God for this indescribable gift!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top