D
dutchcatholic
Guest
i’m just wondering that in baptism if it is better to get water just over your head ( like with babies) or full body under water ( like Jesus did ), is there any difference ?
Short answer is no, but I have a question for you, can you show me where it actually specifies that Jesus was fully submerged?i’m just wondering that in baptism if it is better to get water just over your head ( like with babies) or full body under water ( like Jesus did ), is there any difference ?
You are just as baptized by either method; it’s a matter of personal choice and the customs of your parish.i’m just wondering that in baptism if it is better to get water just over your head ( like with babies) or full body under water ( like Jesus did ), is there any difference ?
The words are the proper form. The water is the proper matter. A valid sacrament requires both.It’s the words, not the water!
Hope you’re in a parish that offers you that option.If Jesus was Baptized via immersion then that is the only way that Baptism of infants and adults should be practiced. When I get married and have children they will be Baptized as babies in the Catholic Church via immersion.![]()
If Jesus was Baptized via immersion then that is the only way that Baptism of infants and adults should be practiced. When I get married and have children they will be Baptized as babies in the Catholic Church via immersion.![]()
And a spouse that agreesHope you’re in a parish that offers you that option.
Since 2001 in my parish parents have been given the option of immersion or pouring. Most opted for pouring but about 15-20% chose immersion. When our last Pastor arrived he was surprised to hear that we offered immersion but he loved it and would have preferred to baptize all infants that way.If Jesus was Baptized via immersion then that is the only way that Baptism of infants and adults should be practiced. When I get married and have children they will be Baptized as babies in the Catholic Church via immersion.
Phemie;14673469:
Hope you’re in a parish that offers you that option.
felsguy;14673743:
And a spouse that agrees![]()
Not very good proof, but I believe I have seen Jesus being fully submerged in a movie once, not a Hollywood movie, but a quite religious one. Would the movie be wrong ?Short answer is no, but I have a question for you, can you show me where it actually specifies that Jesus was fully submerged?
I’ll you one “every depiction I’ve seen of the event shows John the Baptist pouring water over Jesus’ head.” Would the artist be wrong?Not very good proof, but I believe I have seen Jesus being fully submerged in a movie once, not a Hollywood movie, but a quite religious one. Would the movie be wrong ?
Oftentimes people who claim that Jesus was immersed reference the words in Mark 1, “And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him: …” They see coming up out of the water as evidence He was immersed. I find the evidence thin. After all, the Didache mentions the use of pouring.Short answer is no, but I have a question for you, can you show me where it actually specifies that Jesus was fully submerged?
Hi, Dutch!i’m just wondering that in baptism if it is better to get water just over your head ( like with babies) or full body under water ( like Jesus did ), is there any difference ?
Hi!The words are the proper form. The water is the proper matter. A valid sacrament requires both.
Hi!Hope you’re in a parish that offers you that option.
Hi!Not very good proof, but I believe I have seen Jesus being fully submerged in a movie once, not a Hollywood movie, but a quite religious one. Would the movie be wrong ?
The Didache or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, an anonymous book of 16 short chapters, is probably the earliest known written instructions, outside of the Bible, for administering baptism. The first version of it was written c. 60–80 AD.[65] The second, with insertions and additions, was written c. 100–50 AD.[65] This work, rediscovered in the 19th century, provides a unique look at Christianity in the Apostolic Age and is the first explicit reference to baptism by pouring, although the New Testament does not exclude the possibility of this practice."[66] Its instructions on baptism are as follows:
Before the baptism, moreover, the one who baptizes and the one being baptized must fast, and any others who can. And you must tell the one being baptized to fast for one or two days beforehand.[67][c (Baptism in early Christianity - Wikipedia”]Baptism in early Christianity - Wikipedia)Now about baptism: this is how to baptize. Give public instruction on all these points, and then baptize in running water, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit… If you do not have running water, baptize in some other. If you cannot in cold, then in warm. If you have neither, **then pour water on the head three times in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. **
Agreed. Ironically it is often the Baptists (who don’t believe in Baptismal Regeneration) that are most strenuous in insisting on full immersion.Oftentimes people who claim that Jesus was immersed reference the words in Mark 1, “And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him: …” They see coming up out of the water as evidence He was immersed. I find the evidence thin. After all, the Didache mentions the use of pouring.
Jon
Agreed. Ironically it is often the Baptists (who don’t believe in Baptismal Regeneration) that are most strenuous in insisting on full immersion.![]()