Right… but that answer is incomplete. It’s like saying “having a drink or two after a tough day of work isn’t a sin”, but it leaves out the rest of the issue: “… but it’s not a good example to give others, either”…!
I agree with you. If you read all of my posts, you’ll see that I don’t think she should partake, at all. However, I am not going to publicly speak against her priest and say that he is wrong, either. If he said it’s not a sin for her, then it wouldn’t be.
(I don’t think I would say that it’s a SIN for anyone, but I think it can cause scandal and the wrong impression, certainly. However, only God knows our hearts and intentions.)
To go a little further, I completely agree with the points you brought up. Why would we partake in Baptist communion when they are not allowed to participate in ours? As the OP said, the symbolic Baptist communion is just a pale shadow of the true Eucharist, and she shouldn’t feel coerced into participating against her will or through peer pressure.
As a Protestant my whole life until recently, I have participated in many, many such “cracker and juice” communions, and I did it as reverently as I could. Now, I wouldn’t participate because it would feel like I was being false to Christ.
When I was Episcopalian, we thought we were receiving the Body of Christ. Now, I wouldn’t participate at an Episcopalian communion either, because I do not agree with all of their doctrines and disciplines.
And as an aside, not once in all those years as an evangelical protestant did I ever see anyone point out or ask why someone else wasn’t participating in the communion. It was assumed they had their reasons, like they probably weren’t a Christian. No preacher ever said to not partake if you were in sin, so I agree that’s not on people’s minds there. But the people at the OP’s husband’s church do seem rather nosy.