For others:
Went
here. Looked at the December 7th video. The rant begins at about 25:00 into the video.
For Shaolen.
Many partial truths.
I’ll just go into one here in this post (I may go into others in future posts). The point about Cana is just goofy. He forgot to say that Jesus’ reply (by His actions) to Mary eventually included fulfilling the Blessed Virgin Mary’s request.
He neglected to point out that “Woman” hearkens us back to Genesis 3:15.
Jesus is NOT disobeying the commandment to honor your father and mother (at Cana or anywhere else) as the preacher implies (but does not say).
Also in Jesus’ response at Cana there is a Hebrew idiom here being used by Jesus but is beyond the scope of this post to go into it.
This preacher also said the Blessed Mother was unmarried.
This is just plain wrong. When someone is betrothed, they ARE married. The Jews call this
kiddushin. This is translated as “betrothal” many times. Sometimes translated in a slipshod manner as “engaged”.
Then the HUSBAND (NOT the “engaged”) goes and prepares a place for his bride.
He might say to His bride: Where I am going you cannot come. I go to prepare a place for you." Can you think of anywhere where Jesus says THAT to His bride, the Church (see John 14:1-3)?
Incidentally. when the groom takes his bride into his home that he went and prepared, it is termed by the Jews,
nisuin.
Anyway. The Blessed Virgin IS married–that’s precisely WHY St. Matthew refers to Mary as Joseph’s “wife” in MT 1:20.
**
MATTHEW 1:18-20** 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child of the Holy Spirit; 19 and her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to send her away. 20 But as he considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, "Joseph, son of David,
do not fear to take Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit;
You might ask: “Well WHY is THIS important–I mean who cares if they were
married or merely
engaged?”
It matters for several reasons but I’ll name just one. Mary’s Perpetual Virginity.
It would be non-sense for an “engaged” Mary to ask an angel about having a son; “How can this be?”
But it makes even LESS sense if Mary is already married!
And Mary WAS already married to Joseph (but Joseph had not yet taken Mary into his home yet).
“The angel . . .came to a virgin of Nazareth
betrothed (they are already married) to a man named Joseph . . .”
It would be utter non-sense for a married woman to ask HOW can I have a son . . . . unless . . . . unless the woman had already taken a VOW of virginity (as you can see DOES occur in Numbers 30–a “vow to afflict herself”).
"How can this come about?"
The fact that a married woman asks such a question assumes at least a virginal intention.
Then this preacher went on and on birdshotting his gripes about many “issues” he had with the Blessed Mother and the Church.
Very shallow exegesis from him and if he wanted to criticize Catholic doctrine, instead of throwing barbs without any substance, he should do his homework first to avoid such a folly.
But if the preacher DID do his homework, he couldn’t have said and implicated the criticisms that he did . . . at least if he were honest.
And then he goes on about how we should give more honor to the Blessed Mother (he usually just calls Her “Mary”) after ripping Marian doctrine for 10 minutes implicitly and sometimes explicitly.
Nothing at all there, refutes Catholicism.
All his other implicit innuendos and explicit criticisms are fairly easily dealt with too.
I’ll look in on the thread later.
Do you have any specific questions?
Hopefully this is helping. If not I’ll leave it alone. If this is helping, I’d be glad to go further.
God bless.
Cathoholic