Those “prepared” readings are from the Bible. Can you think of something that should properly take the place of the prepared readings?
First of all, not all of the prepared readings are from the Bible and I want to make it clear that I’m not against responsive reading or corporate affirmations (or whatever a given denomination may call them) on principle. I grew up in the Methodist church which has many responsive readings and I have no problem with them, in and of themselves.
I was only stating that they did not seem authentic to me when I was in the Catholic church and that reciting readings is not a way that encourages me to worship of that creates a worshipful or reverent atmostphere to me. Again, the key words here being TO ME.
Second, why do they have to be replaced with anything? Why can’t we just use that time for other kinds of corporate worship or the preaching and teaching of God’s word or perhaps for someone to ask for prayer or to offer a testimony?
The canned prayer is also found in the Bible. The Psalms–again from the Bible.
First, not all of the Psalms are prayers. Second, not all prayers in the Bible are meant to be prayed by us.
sixofseven:
One thing I love about the Catholic Church is that I can go to any Catholic Church, anywhere in the whole world and know that I am getting the same thing.
Precisely why I love being a Baptist.
I can go into any Baptist church and have a very good idea what I’m going to hear. And that doesn’t stop with Baptist churches. I can go into Methodist or Presbyterian church or a Calvary Chapel or a non-denom, and know that I’m going to hear the same Gospel, the same texts, the same hymns, the same creeds and confessions.
Tonks:
That’s the gist in the differences between the Catholic Mass and a Baptist service. There is meaning, history, revelation, purpose, Divine Providence, Biblical support, tradition, beauty, unity, awe, and the Real Presence at each and every single Mass all over the world!
Other than “real presence”, how is that different from a Baptist service?
We have “meaning, history, revelation, purpose, divine providence, Biblical support, tradition, beauty, unity, and awe”, as well.
Sure at Baptist church services, they may have a scripted agenda at best, but it was established because the pastor felt this would be the best way to conduct an hour or two.
First of all, it may interest you to know that the pastor usually doesn’t dictate the order of worship.
Second, are you saying that it’s a bad thing to have an order of worship?
Cody:
I go to an Independent Baptist Church. My Pastor preaches from the NT and OT in the King James Bible. I’m not sure why that Baptist Church didn’t preach from the OT, since there is a lot of references in the OT that relate to the NT, especially when reading the Book of Revelation.
Yeah, I thought this was a pretty odd claim when I heard it, too. That has to have been an issue with that individual church.
Of course, more likely is that the text just wasn’t on the OT the day the person in the OP went.
Every Baptist church I know of teaches and preaches extensively on the OT. In fact, our church has a small, unaccredited Bible school and we offer several classes on the OT. In addition, this past Easter, our preacher preached a series that had to have been at least 75% OT.
Also, the name of my church is actually, Trinity Baptist Church. We believe the Trinity; Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
Again, I noticed this was a strange claim, too.
By definition, Baptists affirm the Trinity. Just because we’re not preaching on it on a given day doesn’t mean that we don’t believe in it or that it is not a crucial doctrine.
Not all Baptist churches are the same. If you want to hear the preaching from my church you can go to this link and listen to the sermons posted…
Unfortunately, we don’t have a website, but if you want to hear some outstanding Baptist preaching, go here:
hcmissions.org/resources/sermons