Beatification Rush?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CathApol
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stayed up way late and saw the live beatification. It’s Sunday morning and lines of people are still waiting to pass by Blessed Pope John Paul II.
My mind can’t follow the discussion points anymore. I’m just so happy with this.
There’s another papal Mass of Thanksgiving for the beatification in the wee small hours of Monday morning on EWTN, 1:30 my time in California. I don’t know if I can keep up with Pope Benedict’s schedule, and he’s way older than me. This has happened before on his apostolic journeys.
Signing off from this thread. And btw, I really like the little insert of the cat biting the hand that wants to start a new thread.

God Bless you all.
 
That was not my point, not by a long shot. A large following, like in the hundreds of millions only assure attention to the issue, as saints serve as role models. The Arian controversy is really irrelevant as canonization now is an exercise of the charism of infallibility.
Well, my point in bringing up Arianism was to demonstrate that if numbers mean something, then we should all be Arians now. I believe it is quite relevant as the putting down of heresy IS the role of St. Peter’s successor - and he should infallibly do so when necessary.
ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/CACANONI.htm

Note this does not extend to beatification.
Yes, I am aware it does not extend to beatification, thank you for acknowledging that too.
As to the role of the promotor fidei in the role of canonization, I think it should suffice that the Holy Father, who has absolute authority in this matter, has determined that such a role is not to have a place in the process. I question the whether it is prudent to try and take that role upon oneself.
And I have said all along that our answer may be reduced to just that. If St. Peter’s successor so binds something, then it is bound on earth as well as in heaven and therefore cannot be in error - for the Holy Ghost would not permit such an error to be bound in heaven.

My point in bringing this up at this time is that we’re still not in the realm of an infallible pronouncement regarding Bl. Pope John Paul II. If there are defenses for the things I have questioned - then we should ALL be prepared with those defenses. If there is no defense for these questions, then no matter how we feel emotionally about Bl. Pope John Paul II - we cannot support the continuation of the canonization process. And again, I say this as one who attributes at least part of my conversion to Catholicism on JPII, but no matter how much “good” he’s done - IF there’s been “bad” and IF we cannot defend him against the “bad” - then we have no business just blindly promoting his canonization process purely on the (selfish) basis that he, somehow, made us feel better.

I, for one, would like to promote someone like Abp. Sheen - whose character, so far as I know, is impeccable. The same would be true of Bl. Padre Pio. Their reach was not as worldwide as Bl. JPII, but then again - we’ve pretty much already dismissed this as a numbers thing - at least for the 21st century.

In JMJ,
Scott<<<

PS- I’m truly not trying to offend anyone here - I want to find good answers to the challenges out there - as we WILL be faced with them, whether we bury our heads in the sand at this time or not.
 
Well, my point in bringing up Arianism was to demonstrate that if numbers mean something, then we should all be Arians now.
I would say rather that if numbers meant everything, then we would all be Arians. Numbers do not mean everything and they have no bearing doctrine, but they still are meaningful on several levels.

I totally agree with you about AB Sheen. His cause has already been opened. I would point out though that unlike the Holy Father, his cause has to start locally and that is time added on. That phase ended in 2009 and now he is being considered by the Vatican. Hopefully he will soon be forwarded to the Holy Father for consideration. When given the Holy Father’s approval, he will be considered venerable. Now, if AB Fulton Sheen was not such a well known celebrity, would this case be going as fast as it is? Perhaps not. Just like the size of one’s following for the cause of sainthood, celebrity status is not relevant to the outcome, but it is relevant to having the case considered.

I think it is important to always view the canonization process as an individual procedure, not a race or contest. The cause of Bl. John Paul II did nothing to slow or hinder any other cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top