M
Maciosaig
Guest
Jesus already died for my sins, I confess my sins daily and every Sunday, I also try to live as good as I can. I fear no “purgatory”
It’s too early for a sense of humorGlad you saw the humor to it , that’s how it was intended. Who says my fellow beloved Catholics have no sense of humor?
You bring out a very important pint here…The matter of “Rules”.I think this is a topic where people tend to think that the rules apply to everyone else, yet they’re special and the Lord knows their heart, etc.
I’m painting with a broad brush here, but this is something that I’ve observed. People know the rules, but somehow certain individuals are exempt.
I tend to think rules are rules. They apply to everyone across the board, myself included.
So, are people less afraid of Hell nowadays? Perhaps. But I don’t think anyone likes to believe they’re bound for it.
Just my $.02.
Purgatory is not an invention of the CC. It was always there and even defined in Judaism. It is called Sheol in Hebrew while Hell is called Gehenna. All the confusion and doubt exist because we treat sin and vice as the same. Sin may be forgiven; but a vice can only be PURGED. We can either pardon or punish theft; how sure can we be that it would fully cure the vice of stealing and there will be no more theft committed. Sin is only the effect, caused by the vice. It is much better to let vices be purged through suffering during our earthly sojourn and avoid the terrible purgatory.This comes from a false understanding of Purgatory.
And, according to some Catholic exegetes, St. Paul also prayed for the dead on one occasion (Onesiphorus), showing that he probably didn’t have an issue with the concept.
The Early Church Fathers taught of Purgatory as the rightful corollary to God’s justice - “nothing unclean”, even a tiny bit unclean, could enter into Heaven, and so those of us who died with any sins on our souls - even if they were not mortal - require purification. They pointed out that the process would be painful, and that we should strive to avoid it at all costs.
The other concept relevant to Purgatory is temporal punishment. Even if we are forgiven of our sins sacramentally, some of our acts merit temporal punishment. (For an earthly example, even if you repent of committing theft and reform your life, you still have to “do time” in prison, or pay a fine.)
So Purgatory is entirely in keeping with the concept of a righteous God who is all good, and all just. It has nothing to do with “sneaking in through the back door” or “just getting a D+ in righteousness.”
Of course, the concept has been taught badly at times, and we often misinterpret it in like with our own desires rather than in keeping with God’s will. But that’s nothing to do with Purgatory, and everything to do with our own sinful nature. “Let God be true, even if every man be proved false.”
““I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either cold or hot. So, because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth” (Revelation 3:14-15).Why??? Paul walked daily with fear and trembling…
A great many Catholics that I know seem to think they will all squeek into Purgatory. No Matter how they lived or ar living. They have a false understanding of purgatory and make no or little effort into being better Christians, they believe all they need is to squeek into Purgatory with a C- or better, so to speak.
Has Purgatory when understood wrong, provoke people to live luke warm lives with no real fear of hell fire???
=YourAverageJoe;9895923]Why??? Paul walked daily with fear and trembling…
A great many Catholics that I know seem to think they will all squeek into Purgatory. No Matter how they lived or ar living. They have a false understanding of purgatory and make no or little effort into being better Christians, they believe all they need is to squeek into Purgatory with a C- or better, so to speak.
Friend, One does not “sweek into Purgatory”Has Purgatory when understood wrong, provoke people to live luke warm lives with no real fear of hell fire???
Purgatory is not an invention of the CC. It was always there and even defined in Judaism. It is called Sheol in Hebrew while Hell is called Gehenna. All the confusion and doubt exist because we treat sin and vice as the same. Sin may be forgiven; but a vice can only be PURGED. We can either pardon or punish theft; how sure can we be that it would fully cure the vice of stealing and there will be no more theft committed. Sin is only the effect, caused by the vice. It is much better to let vices be purged through suffering during our earthly sojourn and avoid the terrible purgatory.
Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you punish him with the rod, he will not die. Punish him with the rod and save his soul from Sheol. (Pro 23:13-14)
“If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out. ‘For everyone will be salted with fire’.” (Mk 9:43, 49)
*It is better to atone for sin now and to cut away vices than to keep them for purgation in the hereafter. In truth, we deceive ourselves by our ill-advised love of the flesh. What will that fire feed upon but our sins? The more we spare ourselves now and the more we satisfy the flesh, the harder will the reckoning be and the more we keep for the burning. *(Imitation of Christ, Book- I, Chapter 24)
If their motivation for being “better Christians” is to avoid Hell, then they are operating entirely out of selfishness anyway. Do you imagine that God is likely to be impressed by that?Why??? Paul walked daily with fear and trembling…
A great many Catholics that I know seem to think they will all squeek into Purgatory. No Matter how they lived or ar living. They have a false understanding of purgatory and make no or little effort into being better Christians, they believe all they need is to squeek into Purgatory with a C- or better, so to speak.
Has Purgatory when understood wrong, provoke people to live luke warm lives with no real fear of hell fire???
Very true…Of course we need to recognize that avoidance of punishment is a prime motivator if the immature. As such very many begin their journey toward God from that point of fear. However, it must be hoped that they do not stay there and instead grow in wisdom and holiness so that Love for God drives out fear.If their motivation for being “better Christians” is to avoid Hell, then they are operating entirely out of selfishness anyway. Do you imagine that God is likely to be impressed by that?
Negative motivations are a bad idea for precisely this reason: rather than encouraging people to do things as well as they can, such threats only encourage people to do the minimum necessary to avoid the punishment.
Amen…Have you noticed how the Bible, a rather long text, spends only a very tiny amount of its time upon the afterlife, and an enormous amount upon this present life? This present life is the one with which we should be concerned, because it is the one in which we can help or harm others.
God is not “impressed” by anything in the sense that you mean, but God is pleased by anything that moves us closer to Heaven. So if fear of punishment is the first step on that journey, God would be very pleased by our fear. If it’s the best we can ever truly do, and it keeps us from mortal sin God will be just as satisfied with that person as with any of the famous saints. I’m afraid your answer comes from pride. Do you remember the parable of the workers in the vineyard? Here’s the crucial part:If their motivation for being “better Christians” is to avoid Hell, then they are operating entirely out of selfishness anyway. Do you imagine that God is likely to be impressed by that?
"When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his foreman, ‘Call the laborers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last group to the first.’ When those hired about the eleventh hour came, each one received a denarius. When those hired first came, they thought that they would receive more; but each of them also received a denarius. When they received it, they grumbled at the landowner, saying, ‘These last men have worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden and the scorching heat of the day.’ But he answered and said to one of them, ‘Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for a denarius? Take what is yours and go, but I wish to give to this last man the same as to you. Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with what is my own? Or is your eye envious because I am generous?’ So the last shall be first, and the first last. Matthew 20: 9-16
I strongly disagree. Have you read very many accounts of saints who were shown visions of Hell? The fear and knowledge that they could easily fall into Hell stayed with them their whole lives. Of course they developed true and deep love for God as they progressed, but fear was still a great motivator for many people that we esteem as being near the pinnacle of holiness. St Alphonsus de Liguori wrote many wise things about cultivating the fear of Hell, such as this:Negative motivations are a bad idea for precisely this reason: rather than encouraging people to do things as well as they can, such threats only encourage people to do the minimum necessary to avoid the punishment.
'Oh, what strength has not the fear of Hell to rein us in from sin!
“And let Him be your dread, and He shall be a sanctification unto you.” [Is. 8:13]
The holy fear of God makes man holy. Wherefore David begged of God the grace of fear, in order that fear might destroy in him the inclinations of the flesh.
“Pierce Thou my flesh with Thy fear.” [Ps. 118:120]
Christ devoted a rather large part of His teaching ministry to descriptions of Hell and how people would end up there. While it’s true that we should be mindful of our thoughts and actions in this life, St Paul tells us:Have you noticed how the Bible, a rather long text, spends only a very tiny amount of its time upon the afterlife, and an enormous amount upon this present life? This present life is the one with which we should be concerned, because it is the one in which we can help or harm others.
Setting our mind on Heaven makes us aware that we might lose our reward as St Paul also frequently warns us.“Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ, keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your mind on the things above, not on the things that are on earth. For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God.” Colossians 3: 1-3
Actually, what you are talking about is God being impressed, right there in the expression “God is pleased”. Pure selfishness, however, is really not very good at moving us closer to Heaven.God is not “impressed” by anything in the sense that you mean, but God is pleased by anything that moves us closer to Heaven.
That is remarkably judgmental, considering how little data you have.I’m afraid your answer comes from pride.
I do. It presents the owner giving the same reward to those who have worked long and to those who have worked only a short time. It does not refer to fear or to selfishness as a motivator.Do you remember the parable of the workers in the vineyard?
The most important point is right there in your last sentence: the development away from a fear of punishment.I strongly disagree. Have you read very many accounts of saints who were shown visions of Hell? The fear and knowledge that they could easily fall into Hell stayed with them their whole lives. Of course they developed true and deep love for God as they progressed, but fear was still a great motivator for many people that we esteem as being near the pinnacle of holiness.
Actually, my search engine counts only 15 references to 'Αιδης and Γεεννα combined across all four Gospels.Christ devoted a rather large part of His teaching ministry to descriptions of Hell and how people would end up there.
Impressed and pleased are different, at least in the way I use those terms. Beings of lower natures can be impressed by other beings of equal or higher natures. God is above all others so He is pleased in the way a father is pleased with the well-meaning, but awkward efforts of a small child. If God is impressed with anyone it would be the Virgin Mary…but for you or I to claim that we “impress” God is not understanding the infinite divide between His nature and ours.Actually, what you are talking about is God being impressed, right there in the expression “God is pleased”. Pure selfishness, however, is really not very good at moving us closer to Heaven.
I’m sorry if I offended you.That is remarkably judgmental, considering how little data you have.
That’s one reading of it. Another reading would be that those who worked long represent saints with extraordinary virtue, and those who worked a short time represent saints who just barely made it to Heaven…probably with a fair amount of time in Purgatory. In the first class would be those who loved God perfectly, not out of fear of punishment. I agree with you that fear of punishment is a base motive and comes from selfishness. That would be the “short-timers”…those whose work for God was relatively minor in that they followed the rules but only out of fear. Fear generally won’t motivate us to perform abundant works of charity, but it can produce some.I do. It presents the owner giving the same reward to those who have worked long and to those who have worked only a short time. It does not refer to fear or to selfishness as a motivator.
On the other hand, the Parable of the Talents talks about precisely that…
You’ve just said that this parable teaches that we can be sent to Hell if we’re afraid of going to Hell…I’m sorry but that can’t be true. Even if the best motivation we could ever manage was fear of Hell, and it kept us out of mortal sin, we would go to Heaven. I’m sure you wouldn’t disagree with that, would you? I’m afraid of Hell, not because I think I’m going there but because it’s a possibility (however slim) for everyone. I’m trying to learn to love God as perfectly and purely as possible, as I’m sure you are too…but we’re not safe until death. We could always have a moment of weakness and commit a mortal sin. It will always be in our fallen nature to do that in this life. If I had to use the fear of Hell to keep me from a really tempting mortal sin, I’d do it in a heartbeat.Jesus really does not represent the fear of punishment there as at all positive.
The most important point is right there in your last sentence: the development away from a fear of punishment.
I agree with you on all this. It’s better to develop genuine love for God.Thus,
"Fear of suffering hereafter and the suffering it engenders are beneficial to all who are starting out on the spiritual way …
It depends on the person in question. For a beginner, true love of God isn’t usually possible, without extraordinary graces. So for that person, negative reinforcement is probably essential for a period of time…and who knows how long we’ll have to grow in faith before we die? For more advanced souls, positive motivation is of course the preferred route - BUT lets all remember that those souls are only advanced because of God’s grace in offering them the initial gift of faith as well as any subsequent graces they asked for to grow in holiness. Goes back to the parable of the workers. The first workers thought they deserved more because of their efforts. The owner says both groups of workers are paid the same because of His generosity.What they all point out consistently is what Plato identified regarding adherence to the Law, what Kant identified regarding adherence to religion, and what modern psychology has identified regarding motivation generally: negative motivations are far less effective in producing genuine changes in people than positive ones are.
That’s not a significant amount?Actually, my search engine counts only 15 references to 'Αιδης and Γεεννα combined across all four Gospels.
Er, no, I haven’t said that. I said that the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard “does not refer to fear or to selfishness as a motivator. On the other hand, the Parable of the Talents talks about precisely that”, because it does explicitly identify fear as a motivator (Mt 25:25) , and the one who acts on that basis is condemned for his actions (Mt 25:30).You’ve just said that this parable teaches that we can be sent to Hell if we’re afraid of going to Hell…
Unless I am misunderstanding a fairly major element of Catholic theology, we would go to Purgatory. What happened there would subsequently get us to Heaven.I’m sorry but that can’t be true. Even if the best motivation we could ever manage was fear of Hell, and it kept us out of mortal sin, we would go to Heaven.
I’m not afraid of Hell, in part because I do not consider the possibility to be nearly as great as you suggest. According to your catechism, “Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent.” Full knowledge and deliberate consent on a grave matter require more than just “a moment of weakness”.I’m afraid of Hell, not because I think I’m going there but because it’s a possibility (however slim) for everyone. I’m trying to learn to love God as perfectly and purely as possible, as I’m sure you are too…but we’re not safe until death. We could always have a moment of weakness and commit a mortal sin. It will always be in our fallen nature to do that in this life. If I had to use the fear of Hell to keep me from a really tempting mortal sin, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
And so you think that we should focus on the essential minimum, rather than on the optimum?For a beginner, true love of God isn’t usually possible, without extraordinary graces. So for that person, negative reinforcement is probably essential for a period of time…and who knows how long we’ll have to grow in faith before we die?
The same search engine counts 46 uses of “forgive” in its various inflections, three times as many; “love” gets 75, by the way. This is something which non-Christians in particular frequently misunderstand about Scripture: the major focus is on this life, not the next.That’s not a significant amount?How many times did Jesus speak about forgiving others?
I think it’s more to do with our easy life style, and democratic society. When Christ was walking around at the time of the Roman Empire, judgement meant something. If you didn’t toe the line, punishments were harsh.Why??? Paul walked daily with fear and trembling…
A great many Catholics that I know seem to think they will all squeek into Purgatory. No Matter how they lived or ar living. They have a false understanding of purgatory and make no or little effort into being better Christians, they believe all they need is to squeek into Purgatory with a C- or better, so to speak.
Has Purgatory when understood wrong, provoke people to live luke warm lives with no real fear of hell fire???
Judgement still waits for all of us, and it won’t be like a human court. There will be no jury, no defending or prosecuting lawyers (they’ll probably be in hell anyway), not one hidden fact, and no grounds for appeal.“I the LORD do not change. So you, O descendants of Jacob, are not destroyed.”
My friend, you just said it again…Er, no, I haven’t said that. I said that the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard “does not refer to fear or to selfishness as a motivator. On the other hand, the Parable of the Talents talks about precisely that”, because it does explicitly identify fear as a motivator (Mt 25:25) , and the one who acts on that basis is condemned for his actions (Mt 25:30).
Can still get where, Hell or Heaven? We can all end up in either destination at any moment in our lives through a single mortal sin. That is Catholic teaching.I am afraid that your fear of “a moment of weakness” sounds far more like a claim that someone who is afraid of Hell can still get there.
I’m speaking of the ultimate destination. The Catholic Church lists four “Last Things” that we must believe in: Death, Judgment, Heaven or Hell. Purgatory, while not desirable, is considered getting to Heaven because everyone in Purgatory will eventually be admitted to Heaven.Unless I am misunderstanding a fairly major element of Catholic theology, we would go to Purgatory. What happened there would subsequently get us to Heaven.
So say you. Many saints and Doctors of the Church say otherwise and were extremely cautious up to the moment of their death to avoid just such a moment of weakness. I’m going to listen to them.I’m not afraid of Hell, in part because I do not consider the possibility to be nearly as great as you suggest. According to your catechism, “Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent.” Full knowledge and deliberate consent on a grave matter require more than just “a moment of weakness”.
I trust in God to be good…I don’t trust in myself to always be good. “The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak”. Trusting God doesn’t preclude believing that we might do something stupid just before we die. “Be watchful, for you know not at what hour the Master will come.”I am not afraid of Hell mostly because I have faith in God, not to “look after me”, but to be Good. Being Good, God is not going to set people up to fail, and is not going to go to all of the effort of the Incarnation only to let it go to waste because someone is led astray by their hormone balance, or someone holds the wrong view of some abstruse element of metaphysical philosophy which cannot be proven by any means available to us.
I never said anything of the sort, my friend. For some people, the essential minimum is all they will likely have time in this life to acheive, and for them it will be enough. Everyone should strive after absolute perfection. “Be perfect, as your Father in Heaven is perfect.”And so you think that we should focus on the essential minimum, rather than on the optimum?
I think the major focus is on both. There are four different ways we can interpret Scripture. Please check out this article: mark-shea.com/scrip6.htmlThe same search engine counts 46 uses of “forgive” in its various inflections, three times as many; “love” gets 75, by the way. This is something which non-Christians in particular frequently misunderstand about Scripture: the major focus is on this life, not the next.
I wanted to share with you one of today’s readings from the Liturgy of the Hours. It is a letter from St Ignatius of Antioch to his supporters. St Ignatius had been condemned to die in the Colosseum while he was serving as Bishop of Syria in Antioch, and he wrote this letter to the Church in Rome while he was being transported there for execution. In it Ignatius asks them not to attempt to free him from captivity because he wants to die as a martyr. He is afraid that if someone gave him the chance, he might chicken-out and try to escape death.I’m not afraid of Hell, in part because I do not consider the possibility to be nearly as great as you suggest. According to your catechism, “Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent.” Full knowledge and deliberate consent on a grave matter require more than just “a moment of weakness”.
No, I didn’t. Please stop reading what you think I mean, and read what I am actually saying. When the parable says that he was motivated by fear, it means that he was motivated by fear; when the master condemns him for this, it means that he was condemned for this. To get from there to “we can be sent to Hell if we’re afraid of going to Hell” requires a leap; to get from my referring to it to “You’ve just said” requires another leap. Please read the actual words.My friend, you just said it again…![]()
Verse 25 says he was afraid. You can disagree with the text if you wish, but do not expect me to follow you.Besides, the primary motivator for the servant in the parable was sloth, not fear. I know the servant said it was fear, but the Master (who truly knows men’s hearts) said, “You wicked, lazy slave…”
“the one who acts on that basis is condemned for his actions (Mt 25:30)” as stated previously.And besides that, you’re twisting the message of this parable pretty severely. The wicked servant was condemned because he produced nothing of value through his laziness.
Again, I’m sorry if I offended you. Let me ask you, what does it mean in the parable when the Master condemns the servant? Does it not mean he goes to Hell? I feel like I’m reading the words. Not trying to make you angry.No, I didn’t. Please stop reading what you think I mean, and read what I am actually saying. When the parable says that he was motivated by fear, it means that he was motivated by fear; when the master condemns him for this, it means that he was condemned for this. To get from there to “we can be sent to Hell if we’re afraid of going to Hell” requires a leap; to get from my referring to it to “You’ve just said” requires another leap. Please read the actual words.
Verse 25 says, “And I was afraid, and went away and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.” Those are the words of the servant. What did the Master accuse him of though? Being wicked and lazy, not afraid.Verse 25 says he was afraid. You can disagree with the text if you wish, but do not expect me to follow you.
Can I ask which translation you’re using? I don’t see that phrase in verse 30. But either way the “basis” would be laziness in this parable. Haydock’s Catholic Bible Commentary has this to say:“the one who acts on that basis is condemned for his actions (Mt 25:30)” as stated previously.
I’m sorry you feel that way. I think I’ve tried to respond to each of your comments and provided plenty of support for my interpretation. Do you always leave when others have different opinions?Sorry, but there really does not seem any point in pursuing a conversation with someone uninterested in listening. Good day to you.