No, Ben. Jumping at conclusions means that you neglected one link in your chain of thought, that’s all. The way you have done up to now, the conclusions simply didn’t seem to automatically and solidly follow. It’s a flaw, in fact.Okay, so I jump to conclusions, and that’s not good. What do you suggest, that I should wait for you to conclude for me, then adopt your conclusions? But then I would end up by becoming a Catholic just like you.
Flaws that you guys cannot prove or fix them.No, Ben. Jumping at conclusions means that you neglected one link in your chain of thought, that’s all. The way you have done up to now, the conclusions simply didn’t seem to automatically and solidly follow. It’s a flaw, in fact.
We can feel it though, just like you do about saint Paul…Flaws that you guys cannot prove or fix them.
Something does not have to be written to be proved. Logic sometimes helps a lot.Also, in many cases in court there are people who are known to be the ones guilty of crimes but for a variety of reasons they could not be charged for lack of… proof!
And in matters of faith, what can you prove per se? Which seems to be why you start saying something and then ask us to disprove it. Even when it’s false, the kind of proof you are asking would have to be material. Yourself wouldn’t dare try to really “prove your point” because of that… which is strange behaviour for a real truth-seeker, don’t you agree?
How? What do you mean? Moreover, not all the true things are “proven” per se, especially when it comes to faith (religion) matters…Something does not have to be written to be proved. Logic sometimes helps a lot.
**Faith does not prove anything. Only knowledge as a result of research. **How? What do you mean? Moreover, not all the true things are “proven” per se, especially when it comes to faith (religion) matters…
And how many get away with faith? Whenever you get to be taken to Court, tell the Judge that you live by faith and not under the Law. The Judge will surely have some saying to share with you.In Court, some guilty party gets away for lack of … proof!
Like it or not, accurate knowledge is not always something able to be proven, period.**Faith does not prove anything. Only knowledge as a result of research. **
Have you ever heard about the criminal who is innocent until what he did is proven true? In other words: If you cannot prove something, it’s because it is not true.And that sometimes it can’t be “proven” does not mean that it is necessarily not true.
You are digging contradictions from your own words.Like it or not, accurate knowledge is not always something able to be proven, period.
Sometimes, maybe, but not ALL the time, Ben, objectively speaking!Have you ever heard about the criminal who is innocent until what he did is proven true? In other words: If you cannot prove something, it’s because it is not true.
And yours. You don’t see them, or maybe you don’t care much about the truth. You care about winning, but not much about your argument being true or not. Winning doesn’t mean always that you are in the truth!You are digging contradictions from your own words.
Can’t you try to use solid arguments rather than to SEEM solid, Ben?Flaws that you guys cannot prove or fix them.
I will try after you find the third night of the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40.Can’t you try to use solid arguments rather than to SEEM solid, Ben?
Excuse me, Ben. It’s not on this thread! And I DID gave you my answer.I will try after you find the third night of the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40.