R
rhiannonh
Guest
One dresses how they would do normally? After all what the point of dressing different for church apart from like any other activity you might do. If its wrong for church then its wrong in the rest of your life???
I don’t think there are hard-and-fast rules re: modesty. Try to cover up tattoos if you can. A good rule of thumb is the “two-finger rule” (the lowest point on the collar must be no more than two index finger lengths from the collarbone – IMO, this is a very liberal standard and should probably be more modest than that) and the “knees covered” rule, i.e., skirt length sufficient to cover at least the knees, even while seated. Overall, though, use judgment and if you’re unsure, ask your priest.Hey everyone I had a few questions about Modesty and Mass. I know I am going to get all sorts of different answers and I am interested in hearing everyone.
What are general rules in mass for modesty? I mean I understand no short skirts and no cleavage but what are exact rules? Like how thick must the straps of shirts be? What about pants what is considered too tight?
Another question I have is regarding tattoos. I recently have returned to the Catholic faith but I have a total of 6 tattoos including one on each upper arm, one on my shoulder, a large piece on my chest and small words on my wrists. My chest tattoo stops just below my collar bone. My question is should I make sure that all of my tattoos are covered for mass? The only ones that would be seen would be the top of my chest tattoo and my wrists. Before anyone asks they are not offensive is any way. My wrists are the words “love” and “God” with roses and my chest is a tribal design with roses as well.
P.S. I have tattoos on my feet that I don’t cover up, but they are of the Chi Ro. My Priest always has me show them to people and he thinks they are cool. lol. I love my Priest, he is a cool cat.Well I am a lecturer at my church and the Priest and the lady who sets up the schedule says that when we lector we should be wearing something atleast knee-length, nothing really tight fitting, and a shirt that has no cleavage and covers your shoulders. That should be appropriate Mass attire. Also I like to use boleros, shrugs, blazers, and sweaters to change things up a bit. You don’t have to forget about fashion because you are going to church.
My priest is liberal on that kind of thing and he would say jeans are fine.I don’t think there are hard-and-fast rules re: modesty. Try to cover up tattoos if you can. A good rule of thumb is the “two-finger rule” (the lowest point on the collar must be no more than two index finger lengths from the collarbone – IMO, this is a very liberal standard and should probably be more modest than that) and the “knees covered” rule, i.e., skirt length sufficient to cover at least the knees, even while seated. Overall, though, use judgment and if you’re unsure, ask your priest.
Personally, I tend to think jeans are too informal for mass. But as long as they (a) cover at least the knees (i.e., capris or longer – no jorts), and (b) aren’t skin tight or anything, I don’t see that they would offend against modesty.My priest is liberal on that kind of thing and he would say jeans are fine.I had to make my own decision on modesty… and veiling.
The problem I run into here is the skin-tight qualifier. Even when not “skin tight” a pair of pants almost always leaves nothing of the lower half of the body to the imagination. I’ve never seen a woman in genuinely baggy pants that dont show off the curves of every portion of the lower half… Anyway, if it were up to me and my wife, every church would have a dozen “take, read, and return” copies of Hammond’s “Dressing with dignity” at the entrance.Personally, I tend to think jeans are too informal for mass. But as long as they (a) cover at least the knees (i.e., capris or longer – no jorts), and (b) aren’t skin tight or anything, I don’t see that they would offend against modesty.
That book is an anti-slacks book. I know traditionalists always love that book but pants aren’t a sin and Cardinal Siri while being a bishop of the Church was not given the gift of infallability. When the Pope says to stop wearing pants I will.The problem I run into here is the skin-tight qualifier. Even when not “skin tight” a pair of pants almost always leaves nothing of the lower half of the body to the imagination. I’ve never seen a woman in genuinely baggy pants that dont show off the curves of every portion of the lower half… Anyway, if it were up to me and my wife, every church would have a dozen “take, read, and return” copies of Hammond’s “Dressing with dignity” at the entrance.
I don’t remember anyone claiming he was infallible. There are many good practical arguments made by her and others against the wearing of slack by women (spec at mass). Infallibility is not required for them to make sense.That book is an anti-slacks book. I know traditionalists always love that book but pants aren’t a sin and Cardinal Siri while being a bishop of the Church was not given the gift of infallability. When the Pope says to stop wearing pants I will.
I like the comment that says If you wouldn’t wear it to a job interview, court etc…![]()
Scottish men wear kilts and no one says they are dressing like women. It just seems like it is an unfair burden that some Catholics place on women. A nice pair of slacks can be just as modest as a dress. If someone wants to dress that way then go right ahead but some of the preaching about skirts only are way over the top.I don’t remember anyone claiming he was infallible. There are many good practical arguments made by her and others against the wearing of slack by women (spec at mass). Infallibility is not required for them to make sense.
That’s interesting because I happen to think women wearing slacks at mass, the vast majority being too tight and showing off contours that men’s eyes are subconsciously drawn to (more so than women, scientific fact) is actually an unfair burden that women place on men. Granted, with healthy self control, eyes can be averted and brought back where they belong, but having to do that in and of itself is a distraction that is absolutely unnecessary and unfair. But then again I’m probably just “over the top”.an unfair burden that some Catholics place on women.
I know that this is geometrically true in theory, I’ve just never seen it manifest itself in the real world… except perhaps in the air force during morning PT in the winter time, but then again I wouldn’t want women wearing huge, baggy, blue clown pants to mass… The blunt fact is, slacks (almost without exception) show the hind end, and a modest skirt (usually) doesn’t. And to this the standard response is, “well I don’t want to see men’s butts in slacks either!” but this is just a biological non-reality. Women are simply not as easily distracted or drawn to this as men are, this is a burden for men, pure and simple.A nice pair of slacks can be just as modest as a dress.
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but to insist that women regularly wearing slacks is anything but a manifestation of early 20th century feminist ideologists’ desire to be seen as equal to men (and they weren’t talking equal in dignity and worth before God) inside and out, is a case of denial and an unwillingness (in my humble opinion) to be the nonconformists that Christians are supposed to be, to standup boldly and reject the “over the top” preaching of the world, the flesh , and the devil (not to say pants are from the devil, rather by that phrase I simply mean that this is all the product of the culture and we’re supposed to be able to reject the culture sometimes even when its unpopular or uncomfortable to do so).If someone wants to dress that way then go right ahead but some of the preaching about skirts only are way over the top.
I think you know how to dress from what you say and I commend you for your desire and intention to dress modestly. Someone said to you to wear your Sunday Best as you are in the Presence of God at Mass. I try to look clean and presentable but I love that Catholics usually wear ordinary clothes to Mass. If everyone who came to Mass wore suits or fine dresses, a poor person could easily be inhibited from coming to that Church for Mass. I do not wish to be a stumbling block to anyone so I wear clean, pressed but everyday clothes to Mass.Hey everyone I had a few questions about Modesty and Mass. I know I am going to get all sorts of different answers and I am interested in hearing everyone.
What are general rules in mass for modesty? I mean I understand no short skirts and no cleavage but what are exact rules? Like how thick must the straps of shirts be? What about pants what is considered too tight?
Another question I have is regarding tattoos. I recently have returned to the Catholic faith but I have a total of 6 tattoos including one on each upper arm, one on my shoulder, a large piece on my chest and small words on my wrists. My chest tattoo stops just below my collar bone. My question is should I make sure that all of my tattoos are covered for mass? The only ones that would be seen would be the top of my chest tattoo and my wrists. Before anyone asks they are not offensive is any way. My wrists are the words “love” and “God” with roses and my chest is a tribal design with roses as well.
I’m a woman and I don’t see where its unfair at all. In fact, it makes me feel more feminine to wear a dress or skirt. I used to wear whatever the trend was, including jeans and way too short shorts. I see where it took away from me as a person and I the only men who were attracted to me were undesired because they were only after me for my body. Now, I am happier actually! As for Mass, I used to think jeans or slacks were ok there too but then I realized how disrespectful it really is. Sure, God still loved me but why didn’t I show my love and devotion to him by dressing respectfully? I changed my ways and I’m happy I did!!! Besides, I am a woman, I want to dress like one… I think many people would say that a nice top and skirt is much more prettier than a hoodie and jeans.Scottish men wear kilts and no one says they are dressing like women. It just seems like it is an unfair burden that some Catholics place on women. A nice pair of slacks can be just as modest as a dress. If someone wants to dress that way then go right ahead but some of the preaching about skirts only are way over the top.
I’m bringing veiling back in style in my parish! LOLI really wish chapel veils were not out of style - but at a minimum I ask her to where a shirt with sleeves, and forbid tights (unless they are under a dress).
I wear tights or leggins’ under my dress. It keeps me just as warm… if not warmer.Many women wear them because it is more comfortable and/or they are cold.
Speaking of veils, Many women in my Parish wear veils including me lol.I’m bringing veiling back in style in my parish! LOL
Personally, I dress modestly. I never wear short dresses, skirts, or anything of that nature. In my opinion I think its ridiclous that so many women [and teens and I am one of them] go around just to be noticed for what they’e wearing. The Mass is the same sacrifice as that on Calvary. Would you really be at Calvary with your clothes falling off in fornt of the Crucified Lord. I would think not. In this day and age people need to wake up and realize what the Mass is.** Bl. Jacinta of Fatima mentioned that ‘‘Many fashions would be introduced that would offend Our Lord very much’’.** Its very clear we’re living in the times she talked about…