No bite to you personally, but I am weary of the liturgical minimalism and iconoclasm that has infected the Church in North America. Not only bells (which the GIRM does not require but states may be used) but sacred art, music, and overall liturgical reverence have all but disappeared in many places. It is true that most of these things are not required for a valid Mass, but they serve to remind us of our heavenly goal.
I think that the problem is a clash of cultures, not a disagreement in values. While I agree with what you say, I also see the liturgy from the perspective of one who belongs to an international religious community with an 800-year history, one who has been on three continents and five countries. When I see some posts and comments about liturgy, I cringe; because they often make absolute statements about things that are not absolutes.
I think of the many people whom I’ve met along the way who do things differently. I think of our brothers and sisters who have a rich tradition that embraces 114 countries, 1.7 million Franciscans and spans 800 years. I think of the many other religious and diocesan clergy in other parts of the world with very different situations. The fact that people belong to the same Church and know nothing about the rest of the Church is sad. Today, we make a great effort to study world cultures, international business, international law, and to stay on top of the news around the world. Yet, we know so little about the Church beyond our backyard.
I think it’s good for people to have a liturgical celebration that lifts the heart and mind to God and that points to eternity. At the same time, it is important that all of us be well educated in that which is outside of our corner of the Church, if for no other reason, to be knowledgeable of Catholic culture.
There is a risk of seeing Catholic culture only from our reality. This can happen to those who lean toward tradition as well as those who lean toward creativity.
Personally, I believe that there is no need to be creative in liturgy. You can’t improve on what is already holy. However, I also believe that every Catholic should be knowledgeable about our rich Catholic liturgical tradition and diversity. We no longer live in a world where people are isolated from others. Today, we have the means of communication, such as what we’re using right now. There is no reason why a Catholic should not know what different religious orders do at mass, what different cultures do, what different Churches do or what the choices are.
To remain in the mindset that says, "I’m in this place and what happens over there has nothing to do with me”, is very limiting. St. John Baptist de La Salle once told his brothers to bring culture into the heart of good Catholics. By bringing culture into the heart and mind of good Catholics, they would be serving the command of Christ “that all may be one.” John de La Salle understood that unity depended on knowledge and understanding. It depended on stepping outside of our space and looking around.
In matters of liturgy, St. Francis always said, “Simpler, simpler, simpler”. Cluny said, “Richer, richer, richer”. Both are right. That’s why they have co-existed in the same Latin Church for 800 years. Most people don’t know this; because we didn’t have the means to know it. We knew what we experienced. As I said above, today, because of the gift of the means of communication, we can know Francis and Cluny. We should know about both and appreciate their contribution to the Church.
By knowing both, we can adapt to different circumstances without distress. We can have a very elaborate and well choreographed liturgy or we can have a very simple and austere liturgy. Both can be equally holy and equally beautiful, while they are different kinds of beauty, just as the sun and the moon are both beautiful, but very different.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
