L
Liberalsaved
Guest
A: Take a joke.…yes, and we understand you’re not Catholic.
Which explains why you have yet to comment on paragraph 2117.
Once again, *paragraph 2117
All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one’s service and have a supernatural power over others - even if this were for the sake of restoring their health - are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another’s credulity.*
The literary debate and comparisons are enlightening, engaging and charming, but I have yet to hear an analysis of the “Catholic Rule Book” from any of you English professors as it pertains to reading Harry Potter.
Catholic Potter readers, especially, please.
SC
B: I feel no reason to take seriously the concerns of anyone who assumes a non-catholic is inherently more capable of evil behavior.