Shirleytowers said: Who can respect your opinion when you haven’t read the books?
to which liberalsaved responded:
It’s also as simple as that. People who don’t know what they are talking about and get all their info from biased, second-hand sources can yelp all they want, but I don’t listen.
I think that’s a very flippant way to disregard what’s been posted on this forum by many concerned Catholics.
I especially appreciated the posts by Bones IV.
Liberalsaved, did you read what was posted? And about what was found
within HP that twisted Catholic belief?
Shirleytowers, saying I or anyone else have to read HP to have an opinion about them is wrong. That’s like saying that I have to practice promiscuity to see if it’s bad for my marriage, or that my children should experiment with drugs or alcohol to find the evil in it. After all, not every kid who tries drugs or alcohol grows up to become a druggie or an alcoholic, right?
Anyone can practice prudence. Mine comes from understand and reading something else: the Catholic Catechism. I’ll repeat what someone else posted here.
*Paragraph 2117
All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one’s service and have a supernatural power over others - even if this were for the sake of restoring their health - are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another’s credulity*.
Have either one of you read this in your Catechism? What’s your response and justification for reading Harry Potter other than “I like it.”?
I don’t see how anyone can read this paragraph and think that* just reading about it* is permissible.
I have to assume you don’t have the grace to discern the evil in this book, and that maybe you’re a cafeteria catholic who chooses what’s “right for me.”
Maybe you could appeal to logic: the woman Rowling is an effective storyteller. For any writer to be an effective storyteller, they have to research their material to make their story believable and authentic. Any clues as to what she researched and incorporated into her books to draw you into her story?
Dump the books, read the Catechism and any other Catholic lit if you’re interested in the progression of your soul. Do the same for your children.
And for anyone who says, “They made my kid read,” I’d like to know how many books on saints your children have read. It should be more than 10, if they’re able to pick up one of those monster HP books.
What about the Catholic Catechism? Have they gotten started on that?
Begin with paragraph 2117…
SC