D
davidv
Guest
Given this definition:
It is doubtful that any instruction nor any evidence, would convince anyone committed to philosophical naturalism otherwise.
[snip]
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
[snip]
K
KingCoil
Guest
Well, Area Man, first I want to tell you that I really appreciate your reaction to my thoughts.Originally Posted by KingCoil
It is my foremost thought that God in relation to man and the universe in concept is the creator of everything that is not God Himself.
And that man can find God in the totality of existence starting with looking for God in man himself, and then in the universe that is studied by scientists, by tracking on evidence of God.
That is why I am always again and again repeating my concept of God and my invitation to everyone to join with me to search for God.
Now, and forgive me, you are not coming forth with your information of the concept of God that you are denying to exist, so please tell me affirmatively that for the sake of our exchange of thoughts and the purpose I have, namely, to search for God, will you just accept my concept of God as a piece of information by which you can already join me to search for God that corresponds to the concept of God as per my concept of God which is information for you.
Yes, you are invited to join a search but you need not insist that you are going to search for something that you don’t believe to exist or that you cannot understand.
Because in the first instance that you do not believe to exist, is that because you have no evidence? In which case that is why I am inviting you to look for evidence of God, etc.
In the second instance that you do not understand the concept of God as per the information I have provided in this forum again and again and again, please tell me what you don’t understand of the following words taken as a complete thought:
God in relation to man and the universe is the creator of everything that is not God Himself.
Forgive me, but if you don’t understand the thought in my mind in that sentence immediately above, then I cannot accept that you are capable of reading comprehension; wherefore, I don’t see how we can connect at all in our mind as to get to act together to search for the evidence of God so that we can ascertain that yes there is God.
The way I see you, you are into many words again and again, but you are thus obviously not keen at all to get on with the search for God.
My words are about my concept of God and my invitation to everyone to come together and look for God, and I am not going about it like Russell bringing in teapot in space, etc.
Not that I am kowtowing to this Roman Catholic forum, but I must commend the folks owners and operators of this forum, that to date I have not been banned forever, for pursing my thought about my concept of God and my invitation to everyone to come join me to search for God.
In another forum I was accused by atheists for wanting to by stealth proselytize them, by pushing my thought about my concept of God and my invitation to search for God, and I got banned.
I hope I can last here indefinitely with my idea which is very precise concise clear and definite, the presentation of my concept of God and my invitation to everyone including specially atheists (because they just simply only do not accept any deity which God is one, etc., etc., etc., or they only deny one more deity than the deities denied by theists, etc., etc., etc., but will talk on and on and on, instead of just going about with their life and having a good life).
KingCoil
A
Aloysium
Guest
You are inviting us to join you. Seems kinda lonely. Why did you leave us?. . . my invitation to everyone to come join me to search for God. . . KingCoil (Defector from Catholicism)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.