I mostly go to
NewAdvent.org as their front page curates Catholic-related news from many different Catholic news sources, as well as articles from mainstream news sources. But then, you have to realize you’re basically letting one guy (Kevin Knight) feed you your news stories. I tend to think he does a good job, but that’s a limitation.
I get annoyed with
Catholic Culture’s news blurbs as the stories I tend to come across there seem to be one paragraph that heightens your interest with no further sources given. But maybe that’s not the norm. I don’t go there often for news (I go there more often for their website reviews).
I like
National Catholic Register.
Cruxnow (at least the stuff from John Allen) is generally pretty good. He worked for years at the National Catholic
Reporter (which I do
not recommend), which would lead me to believe he’d be firmly on the theologically liberal side of the spectrum. But you can’t really tell from his reporting as he doesn’t (often) let his biases creep into his articles. Which is, I think, the hallmark of a good reporter. He has lots of Vatican connections, so his stuff analyzing the Vatican is pretty interesting.
Whispers in the Loggia is good, too, for looking at the goings on of the Church. It’s the first place I go to find out about new bishop appointments and what those new bishops are like. He’s very balanced and avoids turning everything into a liberal vs. conservative narrative.
I like
Crisis on many occasions, but they are definitely more editorial in their coverage of many things, which is not always helpful.
Of course,
Vatican News is a good place to go, especially for those times you are seeking to find exactly what Pope Francis said in context.
CNS (Catholic News Service) is connected to the USCCB, so they are generally going to be a good source.
I imagine
EWTN News is a good place to go, though I seldom think to go there.
Catholic World Report is generally pretty good, too.
I actively avoid LifeSiteNews. (Sorry if anyone’s a fan—I am not.) They editorialize to the point of being misleading, and they have way too many negative pieces on the pope (which, again, are often very misleading).
I’m sure there is more I am forgetting.
