Best YEC argument

[RaisedCatholic]

I think we might skip any further discussion. That you aren’t even aware that theories cannot be proved

Which further demonstrates my point. Since the theory of evolution cannot be “proved,” then that further demonstrates that it’s not observable, testable, & repeatable. But I do agree that no further exchange will produce any good, since by your own admission, you even admitted that since theories cannot be “proved,” then there is no reason to believe in evolution, since - at best - it is just a theory, not a provable scientific fact.

BTW, I have a Bachelor in the Arts & Sciences at a secular university, where I completed enough science courses, including the “theory” of evolution, which qualifies me with “enough knowledge about the subject” to know that real, concrete, testable, observable science does not support the pseudoscience of evolution from a lower life form to mankind.

 

[Dan123]

Which further demonstrates my point. Since the theory of evolution cannot be “proved,” then that further demonstrates that it’s not observable, testable, & repeatable. But I do agree that no further exchange will produce any good, since by your own admission, you even admitted that since theories cannot be “proved,” then there is no reason to believe in evolution, since - at best - it is just a theory, not a provable scientific fact.

The point you’re missing is that no scientific theory can be proven, only demonstrated to be the best explanation given current evidence. It’s as true for gravity as it is for evolution. Scientific facts/laws aren’t the same as theories. Theories explain facts. As was pointed out above, the theory of gravity is changing, that doesn’t invalidate observations of its effects. Same for evolution, we learn more, nuances of the theory change, it doesn’t invalidate the findings of genetics, paleontology, embryology, biology, and so on.

 

[RaisedCatholic]

It’s as true for gravity as it is for evolution…the theory of gravity is changing, that doesn’t invalidate observations of its effects.

The difference thought is that you can test gravity. Let go of something in your hand, and it falls. You can observe & test this. Same with the gravitational pull of the sun on planets & other celestial bodies. You can observe, and even test, the gravitational pull, which is also observable. No so with the “belief” in the evolution of lower life forms “evolving” over millions of years to eventually become human. You can not observe millions of years of evolution, let alone test it or repeat it. At best, it is a hypothesis, not a theory like gravity. Evolutionists have hijacked the term “theory,” applying it to evolution which is neither observable, testable, nor repeatable. You cannot observe or test evolution. You can only surmise this occurs as the “best explanation,” but that is not employing the scientific method, like you can do with the theory of gravity.

 

[EndTimes]

I’ve read many arguments given by Young Earth Creationists against evolution - for example, the nearly total lack of scientific evidence for abiogenesis, the irreducible complexity of the cell, the structure of a bacterium and the eye - and for a young Earth - for example, the decay of Earth’s magnetic field and the salinity of the seas. However, I’ve seen that nearly all of them have been answered.
What I’m asking is: did any Young Earth Creationist ever try to answer the objections leveled against their arguments? Or to give more convincing ones?

YEC - must be a very very rare breed… I’ve only encountered one…

Man has not yet come to realize how Life emerged from Non-Life

More my concern are activist Atheists who likewise? reject Truth…