Bible being the Sole Authority??

  • Thread starter Thread starter aidanbradypop
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh but it does. You are placing the scriptures above the church which is the fullness of Jesus. Now where does Scripture explicitly teach it is the final authority above the church?

I have yet to read it anywhere in the OT or NT.
You are mistaken. You assumed what my position was (right or wrong is irrelevant) and imposed your statement completely outside of what I asked. I asked a simple question and your response went past my inquiry to what you wanted to talk about.
 
Are you trying to say that “fullest extent” means it’s authority encompasses the previous 4000+ years?
Are you just trolling?

Christ’s authority is eternal. Before Abraham, He was. Nothing was ever made that was not made through Him. His authority goes beyond everything and anything. When He delegates authority, that authority carries His authority.

Are you still under the law?
 
And 4,000 + years is above an Eternal God? Show us where God explicitly teaches the Bible is all one needs and is the final authority? I’ll tell you where: NO WHERE!
This is a straw man argument. First of all, my response was not aimed at you. And second, you did not deal with my question as it was asked.
 
You are mistaken. You assumed what my position was (right or wrong is irrelevant) and imposed your statement completely outside of what I asked. I asked a simple question and your response went past my inquiry to what you wanted to talk about.
Your question was answered.
It sounds like YOU are imposing something completely outside the answers you were given.
 
Are you just trolling?

Christ’s authority is eternal. Before Abraham, He was. Nothing was ever made that was not made through Him. His authority goes beyond everything and anything. When He delegates authority, that authority carries His authority.

Are you still under the law?
No, I am not just trolling. And I’m not sure why you can’t answer the question. There is no doubt Christ’s authority is eternal but the Magisterium is not. I asked where in the CCC it showed that the Magisterium was given authority over the OT? I did not see it addressed in any of the sections you provided.
 
No, I am not just trolling. And I’m not sure why you can’t answer the question. There is no doubt Christ’s authority is eternal but the Magisterium is not. I asked where in the CCC it showed that the Magisterium was given authority over the OT? I did not see it addressed in any of the sections you provided.
You can only see what you want to see.

What do you understand the Old Testament to be and what books does it contain?

and

How exactly does the Old Testament holds authority?
 
I think your notions come from the idea that Scripture came before the Catholic Church was formed.
But it didn’t. Scripture was written, copied, translated, handed down, preserved and canonized by the Catholic Church (which proves the Church – not the Scriptures – came first). The Bible came from the Catholic Church. The Church was born on Pentecost Sunday, and not a word of New Testament Scripture was written until at least ten years later.
 
You can only see what you want to see.

What do you understand the Old Testament to be and what books does it contain?

and

How exactly does the Old Testament holds authority?
In Luke 24, Jesus chastised the two men on the road to Emmaus for not knowing what the OT (The Law and the Prophets) said. He called them “fools” and took them to task for not knowing what the OT had said. Jesus then proceeded to give them a Scripture lesson and He expounded unto them all the places in the OT where He was talked of.
 
I think your notions come from the idea that Scripture came before the Catholic Church was formed.
But it didn’t. Scripture was written, copied, translated, handed down, preserved and canonized by the Catholic Church (which proves the Church – not the Scriptures – came first). The Bible came from the Catholic Church. The Church was born on Pentecost Sunday, and not a word of New Testament Scripture was written until at least ten years later.
The OT Scripture came before the Catholic Church was formed.
 
Isaiah,

I don’t see anything in the CCC that you provided that addresses my question. Where does it state that the Magisterium is authoritative over the previously existing OT?
The OT specifically? It does not. Is the OT part of the bible? Yes. Pehaps you believe that the Jewish people are “authoritative over the previously existing OT”?
 
Not the “Bible” as you have stated, but I do give the Scriptures the sole and final authority in all matters of faith and morals to the Christian.
Couple questions I could not answer, as a former protestant:

That’s cool. :thumbsup:Let’s say that the Scriptures are the sole and final authority in all matters of faith and morals. Scripture, (a collection of inspired books) as the sole and final authority cannot discern truth; scripture, as the sole and final authority cannot interpret scripture. After all, people discern truth: people interpret scripture. With that said, who was given the sole and final authority to interpret scripture and discern the truths found within the pages of sacred scripture, in your opinion?

Please show me, in the holy Bible, where God teaches that the holy Bible is the Christians sole and final Authority?
 
In Luke 24, Jesus chastised the two men on the road to Emmaus for not knowing what the OT (The Law and the Prophets) said. He called them “fools” and took them to task for not knowing what the OT had said. Jesus then proceeded to give them a Scripture lesson and He expounded unto them all the places in the OT where He was talked of.
You have not answered my 2 questions.

You talk about this:

13 That very day two of them were going to a village named Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem, 14 and talking with each other about all these things that had happened. 15 While they were talking and discussing together, Jesus himself drew near and went with them. 16 But their eyes were kept from recognizing him. 17 And he said to them, “What is this conversation which you are holding with each other as you walk?” And they stood still, looking sad. 18 Then one of them, named Cleopas, answered him, “Are you the only visitor to Jerusalem who does not know the things that have happened there in these days?” 19 And he said to them, “What things?” And they said to him, “Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, 20 and how our chief priests and rulers delivered him up to be condemned to death, and crucified him. 21 But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since this happened. 22 Moreover, some women of our company amazed us. They were at the tomb early in the morning 23 and did not find his body; and they came back saying that they had even seen a vision of angels, who said that he was alive. 24 Some of those who were with us went to the tomb, and found it just as the women had said; but him they did not see.” 25 And he said to them, “O foolish men, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” 27 And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
28 So they drew near to the village to which they were going. He appeared to be going further, 29 but they constrained him, saying, “Stay with us, for it is toward evening and the day is now far spent.” So he went in to stay with them. 30 When he was at table with them, he took the bread and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 And their eyes were opened and they recognized him; and he vanished out of their sight. 32 They said to each other, “Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the scriptures?” 33 And they rose that same hour and returned to Jerusalem; and they found the eleven gathered together and those who were with them, 34 who said, “The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!” 35 Then they told what had happened on the road, and how he was known to them in the breaking of the bread.
(RSV)

Jesus interpreted the OT to show that it led to HIM.

Go a little before Luke 24 on Luke 22:

14 And when the hour came, he sat at table, and the apostles with him. 15 And he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer; 16 for I tell you I shall not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” 17 And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves; 18 for I tell you that from now on I shall not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” 19 And he took bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 20 And likewise the cup after supper, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood. (RSV)

And here you have the New Covenant.
 
You are mistaken. You assumed what my position was (right or wrong is irrelevant) and imposed your statement completely outside of what I asked. I asked a simple question and your response went past my inquiry to what you wanted to talk about.
Sorry,but I am not mistaken at all. Jesus is Eternal and existed long before anything was penned. No where does Jesus teach the Bible would be the final authority. Jesus founded His church and gave it authority…never makes reference to compiled book called the Bible has being the final authority. Sorry.
 
The OT Scripture came before the Catholic Church was formed.
Yeah and Jesus is the NT which we adhere to and not the Jewish laws,etc,etc. And God came before the Bible which you seem to dance around. Tell me what Bible did Abraham use as his final authority?
 
This is a straw man argument. First of all, my response was not aimed at you. And second, you did not deal with my question as it was asked.
It is only a strawman argument when one no longer can rebuke their challenger with logical answers.

Oh yes…I did and the church has been doing it long before the Bible was compiled as one volume. Read some history.

BTW: Tell me which Bible Jesus used to rebuke his challengers? Did His Bible have 66 books?
 
No, I am not just trolling. And I’m not sure why you can’t answer the question.
The question as been asked and answered, sir.
There is no doubt Christ’s authority is eternal but the Magisterium is not.
Indeed. This is very Catholic of you to say. No one has been positing that the Magisterium is “eternal”.

http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/double-facepalm.jpg
I asked where in the CCC it showed that the Magisterium was given authority over the OT? I did not see it addressed in any of the sections you provided.
The Magisterium has no authority over the Word of God, but is rather, its servant.

Please see the multitude of pridian posts that have already cited where the CCC proclaims to be the servant of the Word of God, not its authority.
 
Not the “Bible” as you have stated, but I do give the Scriptures the sole and final authority in all matters of faith and morals to the Christian.
okay…can you demonstrate how the Bible exercises its authority in all matters of faith and morals?

Where does the Bible say this is so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top