M
MarysRoses
Guest
I’m starting a new thread. I was challenged to take on the Adventist interpretations of bible symbols. The links given contained several pages of material and only a few were relevant to the thread.
The bible is very rich in symbolism. Many of the interpretations I would agree with. However, I think it is very important, especially given how Adventists use these symbols, to highlight that often their interpretation is not the ONLY or even the best interpretation of a symbol. Doctrines, such as the Adventist ideas about prophetic interpretation, that are arrived at by interpreting symbolism, are only as credible as the source material used for arriving at those conclusions.
Interestingly, you said there was no code:
After having it pointed out that Adventists themselves call their complicated way of interpreting the bible a ‘code’, you now ask me to tell you why I don’t agree with it.
I refused to take up the subject within the other thread, because your links have many pages of material.
Symbolism is of course used in Scripture. I will probably agree with some of these. Some, I don’t think are definitively defined, others I’m likely to disagree with of course. I do think this thread is useful, because it is helpful to understand how Adventists arrive at some of their conclusions, and highlight what I see as a weakness of the approach, in that not every symbol is unambiguous, and many have alternate meanings.
MarysRoses
The bible is very rich in symbolism. Many of the interpretations I would agree with. However, I think it is very important, especially given how Adventists use these symbols, to highlight that often their interpretation is not the ONLY or even the best interpretation of a symbol. Doctrines, such as the Adventist ideas about prophetic interpretation, that are arrived at by interpreting symbolism, are only as credible as the source material used for arriving at those conclusions.
I did not say that Adventists keep their ‘code’ secret, I said they have their own way of looking at the bible through their own system of symbols. A ‘code’. I called it a ‘secret’ becuase it seems only Adventists and their forebears arrive at the same conclusions.Ok. I see what you are trying to say. But the problem is, the CODE being referred to is not an “Adventist secret” we actually broadcast it to the world. Pastor Doug, and others, refer to this CODE as secret, only because many doctrines cover their real meaning with falsehoods. The “keys” are widely available to anyone who has a Bible; so in that sense, there is no secret. The link you provided actually has a list of Bible verses depicting what the Bible uses various things as symbols for; especially in Bible prophecy. Perhaps you could tell us which one of those texts are wrong? Which example used there needs correcting?
Bible Symbols, and Bible numbers, are commonly used in the Bible as symbols of a truth God wants known, something like a parable is a symbol for truths that Jesus often wanted to communicate. Please examine the “Code” in these two links and tell us which ones are wrong!!
Interestingly, you said there was no code:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2385942&postcount=65The “secret code” is non-existent within Adventism.![]()
After having it pointed out that Adventists themselves call their complicated way of interpreting the bible a ‘code’, you now ask me to tell you why I don’t agree with it.
I refused to take up the subject within the other thread, because your links have many pages of material.
Symbolism is of course used in Scripture. I will probably agree with some of these. Some, I don’t think are definitively defined, others I’m likely to disagree with of course. I do think this thread is useful, because it is helpful to understand how Adventists arrive at some of their conclusions, and highlight what I see as a weakness of the approach, in that not every symbol is unambiguous, and many have alternate meanings.
MarysRoses