Bible Exhibition

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeanG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SeanG

Guest
:rolleyes: This morning I went to the ribbon-cutting ceremony of an exhibition (housed at a downtown hotel) called, “The Dead Sea Scrolls to the Bible in America.”

I was invited to it because I am a member of the local media. The folks involved with the exhibition (it is a traveling one, staying for a month in this city) wanted some free publicity.

Before I went, I had my suspicions when I looked over the advance pubicity material. It made me think that it was bankrolled by some evangelical group that thinks that the Declaration of Independence should be considered as an appendix to the KJV. :hmmm:

The first thing that I saw was a large reproduction of a portrait of John Wyclif. Following him were framed (print) paintings of Luther, Calvin, and Knox. The publicity lady gave me a book written by (I think) a minister or Bible college prof connected with the exhibit. The book’s title is “The Forbidden Book: The Story of the Chain-breakers” and was written by Dr. Craig Lampe.

On the back cover you can read the following: “During the Dark Ages, superstition and ignorance controlled the minds of the masses. A few brave men obeyed God and brought the Scriptures to the world.” Then there are quick bios of Wyclif, Luther, and Tyndale. :banghead:

At the top of the front cover you can read: “Many [read: the Catholic Church ] stopped at nothing [read: inquisitions killing millions of Christians] to conceal the light…A few risked everything [including their souls?] to reveal it.” There was also a picture on the front cover of a Bible that is chained shut with a enormous chain and a large padlock. :banghead:

Anyway, the exhibit was ok. They had some ancient artifacts, including some smaller-than-postage-stamp size fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls. They had some 16th century editions of some Bibles in English. They also had some pages from some medieval illuminated manuscripts of some psalms. They also had an early edition of the Douai-Rheims Bible. In the note to that they said that it was, in large part, the translation of an edition of the Vulgate authorized by Pope Clementine [that edition is often called the ‘Clementine Bible’, authorized by Pope Clement VIII in 1592–what utter lack of simple scholarship!!!]. :bigyikes:

In the section with the early English Bibles, there was a large chart that had a timeline and what languages the Bible was in at various times. They claimed, of course, that the Bible was only in Latin from the mid to late patristic era to the time of Wyclif. Whatever. :rolleyes:

Then there was a section about the history of the Bible in America. There were also reproductions of a couple of letters from Jefferson trying to show him to be a Scoville Bible reading fundamentalist. Whatever. :rolleyes:

At the ribbon cutting ceremony, Greg Garrison was the host. He is a local conservative radio talk show host, made famous for being the prosecutor in the Mike Tyson rape case. Various conservative state representatives and senators spoke, saying that the exhibit should quell all debate about the authenticity of the Bible, the Christian roots of our nation, and can be an answer to those who want to take God out of the pledge, the schools, etc.

Although I think that Catholics can join them in some of their sentiments, I think that the overall tone and, indeed, misinformation of the exhibit makes it one that I could never recommend to other Catholics or anyone else for that matter.

The media organization for which I work will not be giving any free publicity to the exhibition. 😉
 
Hey Sean,

Well, it sounds like a reformers ball up there in Indy. I was wondering if that exhibit will ever come down here to Evansville, but then I got an even BETTER idea.

Lets hear where this exhibit is being held at and I will arrange a squad to road trip up there and check out what kind of foolishness is being spread with that three ring pseudo scriptural display.

I wouldn’t even mind asking some specific questions particularly directed at dispelling some of the Wycliff-Tyndale-Luther-Calvin hero claims. I feel the apologetic adrenaline starting to surge. Good ol’ Henry G. Graham’s book about how we got the Bible has primed me for such an excursion. I am hoping to bring this to the attention of the folks in my weekly Cursillo group and spark some interest.

Look to hear from you Sean.
 
maybe you should write it up…but focus on the poor scholarship and bigotry in hte first three paragraphs 😃
 
Wow Sean…it must have been hard to take some of that garbage! From what you wrote, though…it didn’t sound like anything was blatantly anti-Catholic…so I guess that’s a good thing. I’m with Quasimodo, though- you should write a scathing review of the thing! 👍
 
" I’m with Quasimodo, though- you should write a scathing review of the thing! "

“They will know you are my disciples by your love for one another.” i understand your frustration when you think some one is wrong or attacking you but it is fairly unbiblical to attack back. to defend is fine but to instigate an attack is not. as mistaken as these people may be (and perhaps you too are mistaken in some of your views as well…luther did have a huge influence in getting the bible produced in the vernacular of the people and the others had enormous impacts on getting individuals reading the scriptures. i know that sola scriptura is wrong and self-interpretation can lead to wrong conclusions, but even the catholic church today encourages catholics to read and study the scriptures. this is directly related to the protestant reformation.) they are our brothers and sisters in Christ, and to attack them in public will always cause more harm than any good that could come out of it.
 
UHG! I went to that exhibit when it was in Akron and my mom and I just left angry. You’re right, it was very biased and it was anti-Catholic. It was sickening. Especially in the movie that they showed us when we first went in. The entire movie was about how the evil CAtholic Church kept the Bible from the public and cruelly executed those who did. :mad:

One thing I noticed is that in the entire exhibit that is supposed to tell the entire history of the Bible, not one thing was mentioned about how the New Testament Canon was established! Well, then they would have had to give the Catholics credit they didn’t even want to touch! It was like they deliberately skipped over a huge part of history. It went from the Old Testament material, straight to how the Bible was translated into vernacular languages. UH, Hello, your missing something here!

What I think is sad is that they are spreading their Anti-Catholic message all over the country. I saw entire church youth groups attending this thing and I’m sure they’re all leaving with a screwed up view of history at the expense of the Catholic Church.
 
I think that Bengal Fan has something of a point. Deliberately going to an exhibition like this one to pick a fight isn’t good. Anyway, they’re charging $15.00 to get in (WAY overpriced, in my opinion–you’d have to pay me to go back) and I think that deliberately starting conversations with the kind of folk who support these events in order to convince them of their errors probably wouldn’t be effective.

Now, if in the midst of a simple conversation with one of them there is an opportunity to point out the errors found in it, I think that it is right and good to bring it up. But I think that this is different than starting a conversation just to bring that point up.

In any case, what is always needed is prayer–prayer for these folks that the Holy Spirit might enlighten them to the truth and for ourselves that we might bear this cross as Christ did and to speak the truth in love.
 
The first Bible printed in the vernacular was printed in German in 1466. Matrin Luther had nothing to do with it as he was not even born then.
 
A chained Bible would actually be an epithet that should apply to the Great Bible translation that was authorized by Henry VIII. It was a revision of the Coverdale Bible, which was a revision of the Tyndale Bible. So, the term should properly be anti-Anglican. It does severely impugn one’s scholarship to miss such a point, but a Google search revealed that it is a popular theme in Evangelical (not Lutheran) circles.
 
While as Sean mentions, Bengal_Fan is right to avoid going out and picking fights with no provocation, it is not unwarranted to defend the Church from scurrilous claims that it lived in Dark-age superstition or subjected Europe to forced scriptural illiteracy. Jesus did not hesitate to battle the teachers in Israel, especially their ‘protestant’ sadducees who could see no scriptural basis for a resurrection or purgatory. Let’s try no to forget, in this age of apostasy and paucity of conversion miracles in Europe especially, that the one great miracle wrought there by God through an apologetical soul was the conversion of thousands of Calvinists in Zwingli’s hinterland by polemical tracts written and publicly debated by Francis de Sales. Collected by TAN books under the title ‘The Catholic Controversies’, these counterattacks by de Sales offer a great example of the desired ‘new evangelization’ needed today (countering not only secular-humanist beliefs, but also the bigotry that works a disunity of faith and reason, such as bad evangelical and other protestant scholarship begets). So remarkable was de Sales’ courage (and the power of grace with him) that under dire threat to his life so many were converted by his sincerity, charm, wit and entirely fair punching, and he won the title of patron saint of Christian writers (not Catholic writers alone, mind you).
The huge irony today is that sound Catholic and Greek Orthodox theology needs the help of committed protestant brethren to join forces in combating the most deleterious source of hypocrisy today: the pseudo-Catholic teaching of ultra-modernist pedagogues, thanks to whose overly symbolic and meatless ‘dialectics’ two generations of Christian children have been lost and a new crop of morally liberal politicians has arisen. Surely,the sophistry of reducing the content of faith to myths and symbols is the very sort of casuistry that (over)zealous souls like Martin Luther would have wanted to tackle head-on, teeth bared. So why should we allow our would-be allies to continue shooting us in the foot with outrageous inflammatory claims that predate (and were answered long before) the 20th century? It certainly does them no good to be left in a new ‘Dark Age’ of ignorance !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top