You already stated your feelings about Scott Hahn, now you’re just refusing to back them up with any evidence.
Oh really? Have his writings been pulled,banned?.You don’t determine who is heretical- the Church does.Raymond Brown was considered a bulwark between ultra-right and ultra left.
Okay what’s wrong with him ? Untrustworthy because he’s a convert? Yeah maybe he’s still in secret a protestant who has been sent to destroy biblical theology!!!LOLHe writes frequently for The Catholic Biblical Quarterly-(I guess that makes that publication suspect!). and is highly respected.He’s dynamic and brings a passion to biblical studies that many should emulate.:Isit because he teaches at Steubenville?
Monsignor George Kelly wrote an article for *Catholic Dossier *on Fr. Raymond Brown detailing his accomplishments but also his departures from truth. Also, a priest who is a personal friend of mine was in a class taught by Fr Brown, and he said Fr. Brown was always able to avoid getting into trouble because he would always present what the Church taught and then follow it with “but. . .” and his own particular heretical ideas.
OK, great news. I started a thread here about Scott Hahn, so you can post your opinions about him, complete with evidence from his writings of how he is not faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church.
So, what are you sceptical of then if it’s not what he’s written? You don’t like the way he looks?
Here’s what the Navarre Bible footnotes say about Exodus 20:16
Unfortunately, you cannot always rely on the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur. For instance, the Nihil Obstat for Fr. Brown’s *New Jerome Biblical Commentary *was issued by…Fr. Brown himself (along with 2 of his editors).
Why don’t you read Msgr Kelly’s article? He talks about a book authored by Fr. Brown that actually shook the faith of many of the Catholics who read it because it cast doubt on Jesus’ institution of the priesthood. I would call that heretical, wouldn’t you?By what standard are those ideas heretical ? Yours ? Your friend’s ? Father Kelly’s ? Father Brown’s ? C.A.F.'s ? The Church’s ?
So, saying “…but…”, as described, does not amount to anything.
What some people call heresy is very often nothing of the kind. So far, all we have is suspicion, but no substance whatever. Unless there is some substance in these accusations, rather than this endless whispering campaign, there is no case to answer. These attacks on a dead priest never even censured (let alone punished) for his alleged unorthodoxy are a disgrace; they are really scandalous. If this is orthodoxy, may God save us all from it.
.Feminine doesn’t mean feminist. Women are God’s creation also by the way worthy of dignity . - to even say so is silly to the extreme.
He is well within the parameters of Dei Verbum- and again unless the Magisterium corrects him- I have no problem with him.Whatever you may think he does know his stuff - he is erudite and well respected by Catholic Biblical scholars So no matter what some malcontents say- he is a catholic in good standing.