Bible verses for purgatory

  • Thread starter Thread starter evidence
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure, and many people also believed the Corban rule was from God, but Jesus proved that to be a tradition of men by the Scriptures. I don’t recall any mention of this practice anywhere in the New Testament. Also, if it was possible under the OT to make a sin offering for someone who died in mortal sin and expect God to forgive them, then in what way is it possible, under the New covenant, to get God to forgive someone who died in mortal sin? Please be sure to include the scripture verse to support your claim.
You were given NT examples…the passage from Maccabees (which I do not require you to accept as inspired in order to prove my point) simply illustrates the Jewish concept of the afterlife. Elsewhere in this forum, a Messianic Jew specifically stated that he believes in purgatory, and he is not a Catholic. Thus, it can be demonstrated that within the cultural milieu of Jesus and the Apostles, the concept of a place of cleansing after death was accepted. Jesus NEVER repudiated that belief, and it is my contention that some of His parables uphold it.
How can it be forgiven if I pay for it myself (in purgatory)? Perhaps the message here isn’t that there is another place between heaven and hell (wouldn’t that be Earth?), but to show just how deadly it is to blaspheme the Holy Spirit?
Are you suggesting that I have blasphemed, Cachonga?

Purgatory is a place of temporal punishment for sins…a purification before entrance into heaven. Those in purgatory have the joy (greater than any in this life) of knowing with certainty that they are going to be in heaven.
So just as there are degrees of reward in heaven (as shown from 1 Cor 3:1-15), there are also degrees of punishment in hell (unless you think St grandma will receive the same reward in heaven as St Paul, or Joe Apostate will receive the same punishment as Judas Iscariot).
I agree with this, but I don’t follow…sorry. What is your point?
Already covered!
Already rebutted in my post above.
Excuse me, but I thought purgatory was supposed to be a place of purification, not trying (or proving) one’s faith. 1 Peter 1:6-7 reads, “Wherein you shall greatly rejoice, if now you must be for a little time made sorrowful in divers temptations: That the trial of your faith (much more precious than gold which is tried by the fire) may be found unto praise and glory and honour at the appearing of Jesus Christ:” (DR emphasis added). When read in context (a strange concept for some, to be sure) it should be obvious that we are going through trials in this life (now), so that our faith may be found (or proved) genuine. This also makes it clear that our faith is “much more precious than gold which is tried by the fire”. This is not an indication of purgatory, but a comparison of our faith with gold.
The passages suggests that we may be refined after death so that we are PURE even if we die with some worldly attachments still staining our wedding garments.
 
What does this mean - “only as one escaping through the flames” (emphasis added)? What went through the flames? it wasn’t the man, but the works. This speaks of judgement and rewards (everyone’s works will pass through the fire, but only those whose works are not burned up will receive a reward).
The “one escaping” is a person, not a thing.

This is the heart of your misunderstanding of the passage.
 
Sure, AFTER his WORKS are burned up! Where does it say the MAN went through the fire? Notice that the others whose works are not burned up (even though they went through the same fire as the works that were burned up) receive a reward.
Actually if you read what I said you would be less frustrated. The works are burned up, but what suffers the loss? The MAN!! Works don’t float around suffering loss. Souls do.
Matt 5:26 is the last verse of a parable. What is the lesson of the parable?
A parable??? Says who? Even if it was a parable, the underlining message is the same. We cannot get out (of where?) until we pay the last penny.
Sounds like you’re suggesting that Jesus lied when he said “It is finished.” (John 19:30)
Not all. Jesus’ work is finished. However, we are not yet perfect and only perfection can enter Heaven. *Rom 2:5-6 you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. For he will render to every man according to his works. *You see we still play a part. We have to co-operate with God’s grace in order for that glorious work of Christ’s on the Cross to be complete in us. Paul knew this and so was “*working out his salvation with fear and trembling” *Philippians 2:12-13.
 
Purgatory is a work of Christ? Are you serious? Jesus spoke plainly about heaven and hell, but not one word on purgatory, so how can you even think it’s His work (apart from “because the Church says so!”)? And here you are, referring back to 1 Cor 3:14-15 (which has already been addressed), and stating “There is no ‘loss’ in Heaven”, but you seem to ignore the fact that this is a trying of our WORKS, and those whose WORKS survive will receive a reward! Are there rewards in heaven?
Yes Cachonga I’m serious. Jesus doesn’t have to state something explicitly for it to be true. Jesus never uses the word trinity, yet all Christians believe it. Or is that just because the Church told you so!

Yes I was referring back to 1 Cor 3:14-15 “(which has already been addressed)” - didn’t realise you had the final say on the issue. Yes it has been addressed, yet referral back to it seems necessary because you keep misrepresenting what has been said to you. Show me where anyone says that the WORKS will receive a reward. It has been said, however, that HE will suffer loss (just like it does in the bible).
Except when the scriptures are taken in context, and the fact that Jesus (who is God), never mentions any such place in the same way He tells us about heaven and hell. I find this “argument from silence” (“Nowhere does He deny its existence.”) to be very selective. Rather than go off on a tangent (and leaving the topic in the dust), I’ll just end this thought here.
Just wondering how you can explain (in context of course) what Paul means by a man suffering loss after he has died.
Of course, it couldn’t have been purgatory, since anyone in this place is destined for heaven anyway (right?). Of course, Peter tells us why this was done – “that they might be judged indeed according to men, in the flesh;” (DR). It seems clear that the preaching to the dead was so that they would have no excuse for their rebellion to God when they were alive.
These dead were not rebellious to God because they were not in hell. They are the OT saints. They were not in hell and they were not in heaven. Call it whatever you like, but they were someplace waiting.
What proof do you have that Onesiphorus was dead when Paul wrote this?
Paul is speaking of him in the past tense. See this link for Protestant commentaries backing up this opinion.socrates58.blogspot.com/2009/07/onesiphorus-2-tim-116-18-419-explicit.html
 
Dear Cachonga

You make reference in a negative fashion that Catholics only believe dogma because the Church tells us. For Catholics, this is not really problem because it is rooted in Sacred scripture that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth and Jesus tells us that we should go to the church if we cannot agree on issues.

I think the same can be said for protestants. Many I have come across believe what they believe because their particular church told them how to interpret scripture. Unfortunately, they claim that interpretation for themselves. They all say that the Holy Spirit led them to that conclusion. They are really just mimickers.

I can have certainty of interpretation that you cannot because you are left at your own devices. Acts 8:30-31 - Philip knew he needed a guide. 2 Peter 1:20 - NO prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation.
 
Cachonga,you wrote - “, but the Council of Florence (1439-43) removed it. As the canon is not the topic of this thread, I will end my comments on the subject here.”

First, I apologize for using the 30K denominations number…I truly didn’t know it was a false number. However, whether its 20K, or 10K or 500 or 2, my point still holds…it is not what Jesus had in mind.

Again you cite a council as having more authority than individual christians, even bishops…so there’s the council of jerusalem(acts 15), the council of florence, and the council of hippo, all declaring what the holy spirit wants…sounds like an authoritative church guided by the apostolic succession of bishops to me.
By the way, at what point after 400ad do you believe these councils had no more authority?
 
Paul’s letter to the Laodicians was never in the canon of scripture. The canon was first formulated in Hippo in 393 and then again at Carthage in 397. The Council of Laodicea had a list similar to list to what we have today. I think technically speaking, the official declaration of the canon was given at the Council of Florence in 1441. If we look at the list Hippo and Carthage had it is the same we have today.
 
Randy Carson:
You were given NT examples…the passage from Maccabees (which I do not require you to accept as inspired in order to prove my point) simply illustrates the Jewish concept of the afterlife. Elsewhere in this forum, a Messianic Jew specifically stated that he believes in purgatory, and he is not a Catholic. Thus, it can be demonstrated that within the cultural milieu of Jesus and the Apostles, the concept of a place of cleansing after death was accepted. Jesus NEVER repudiated that belief, and it is my contention that some of His parables uphold it.
And yet, when Jesus tells us the (true) story of Lazarus and the rich man, the only thing between the righteous and the damned is a great chasm (see Luke 16:19-31). I also notice that Abraham didn’t suggest that if the rich man’s brothers would make a sin offering for him that he could cross over to the other side.
Randy Carson:
Are you suggesting that I have blasphemed, Cachonga?

Purgatory is a place of temporal punishment for sins…a purification before entrance into heaven. Those in purgatory have the joy (greater than any in this life) of knowing with certainty that they are going to be in heaven.
I am not suggesting any such thing. I am pointing out that you are contradicting yourself. On the one hand, you say “Does this not imply that some sins can be forgiven in the age to come?” (in regard to Matt 12:32), but then you say “Purgatory is a place of temporal punishment for sins…a purification before entrance into heaven”. If I am forgiven, then what am I paying for? If I’m paying for my sin, then how can you say I have been forgiven? Maybe another way to ask the question would be like this – if you blasphemed Jesus as you were breathing your last breath, would you be in purgatory or hell? Could this sin be forgiven after you die? If so how? On the other hand, if you blaspheme the Holy Spirit, even if you live another 1,000 years, you cannot be forgiven. Isn’t this the lesson being taught here?
Randy Carson:
I agree with this, but I don’t follow…sorry. What is your point?
The point is that 1 Cor 3:1-15 speaks of our rewards for our works (which are tried), and has nothing to do with purgatory.
Randy Carson:
Already rebutted in my post above.
You didn’t rebut, you simply restated. Again, 1 Cor 3:10-15 shows that our works are tried in the fire, not us. Our reward is based on how well our works pass through the fire. I understand this in the same way that my workplace determines annual bonuses; that is, my work (job performance, accomplishments, use of company resources, etc…) is evaluated, and based on that (and overall company profit margin), I could get a bonus anywhere from nothing to thousands of dollars. This may not be a perfect analogy, but I hope it gets the point across.
Randy Carson:
The passages suggests that we may be refined after death so that we are PURE even if we die with some worldly attachments still staining our wedding garments.
I don’t see how you can get that idea from the 1 Peter 1:6-7. Are you suggesting that purgatory is a “trial of your faith”? If so, we have yet another contradiction. Furthermore, Peter wrote this to believers who were still alive, so his advice to greatly rejoice “if now you must be for a little time made sorrowful in divers temptations…” cannot apply to purgatory. What temptations do people face in purgatory? In verse 7, Peter compares our faith with gold that has passed through the fire. Notice, it’s a comparison of our faith with pure gold! How does our faith become like this? Through “diverse temptations” in this life!
Randy Carson:
The “one escaping” is a person, not a thing.

This is the heart of your misunderstanding of the passage.
I suggest it is you who is misunderstanding this passage. What about those whose works were not burned up? Did they escape anything? What does the Scripture say? “If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.” (1 Cor 3:15 KJV). The man’s work is burned. The man suffers loss (he gets no reward). Salvation was never an issue. The man gets heaven, but gets no rewards (has nothing to show for his life on Earth). To build on the previous anaology, I would still have my job, but no bonus.

<continued…>
 
40.png
dpgreen:
A parable??? Says who? Even if it was a parable, the underlining message is the same. We cannot get out (of where?) until we pay the last penny.
I stand corrected on this. I was looking at one thing and responding to another (hey, I never claimed to be infallible!). Sorry for the confusion.

What are the wages of sin? How can a man pay these wages? If one is cast into prison (hell) until he has paid the last penny, how long will he have to be “locked up” before he has paid for even the smallest sin? Furthermore, since purgatory is supposed to be a place of temporal punishment (not a place to “pay for” one’s own sins), then how would this apply to purgatory?
40.png
dpgreen:
Yes Cachonga I’m serious. Jesus doesn’t have to state something explicitly for it to be true. Jesus never uses the word trinity, yet all Christians believe it. Or is that just because the Church told you so!

Yes I was referring back to 1 Cor 3:14-15 “(which has already been addressed)” - didn’t realise you had the final say on the issue. Yes it has been addressed, yet referral back to it seems necessary because you keep misrepresenting what has been said to you. Show me where anyone says that the WORKS will receive a reward. It has been said, however, that HE will suffer loss (just like it does in the bible).
While it’s not the topic of this thread, I would say that the doctrine of the Trinity is obvious in the Scriptures, even though the word is not used.

I never said the works receive a reward, but those whose works are not burned up DO receive a reward. It is the one whose works are burned up that does not receive a reward. BTW – I never claimed to have the “final say on the issue”.
40.png
dpgreen:
Just wondering how you can explain (in context of course) what Paul means by a man suffering loss after he has died.
Explained above.
40.png
dpgreen:
These dead were not rebellious to God because they were not in hell. They are the OT saints. They were not in hell and they were not in heaven. Call it whatever you like, but they were someplace waiting.
Your logic is faulty. If it’s useless for Jesus to preach to those in hell because they aren’t getting out, it’s just as useless to preach to those in heaven because they’re already there. Furthermore, it’s equally useless to preach to someone in purgatory because they’re going to go to heaven already. Of course, He could have preached to both the OT saints AND those in hell (Lazarus and the rich man shows that either side could see and communicate with the other). But are you suggesting that the OT saints were in purgatory?
40.png
dpgreen:
Paul is speaking of him in the past tense. See this link for Protestant commentaries backing up this opinion.socrates58.blogspot.com/2009/…-explicit.html
I find other commentaries that put forth that Onesiphorus was not dead, but traveling and not at home when Paul wrote this. Since we know that he traveled to Rome, this seems to be a valid theory. However, just for argument sake, even if he was already dead (and based on the evidence presented, I concede it could be possible), I notice that Paul addressed the prayer to God (not any saint in heaven), and he didn’t ask for his release from purgatory (or ease of his punishment).
40.png
dpgreen:
Dear Cachonga

You make reference in a negative fashion that Catholics only believe dogma because the Church tells us. For Catholics, this is not really problem because it is rooted in Sacred scripture that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth and Jesus tells us that we should go to the church if we cannot agree on issues.

I think the same can be said for protestants. Many I have come across believe what they believe because their particular church told them how to interpret scripture. Unfortunately, they claim that interpretation for themselves. They all say that the Holy Spirit led them to that conclusion. They are really just mimickers.

I can have certainty of interpretation that you cannot because you are left at your own devices. Acts 8:30-31 - Philip knew he needed a guide. 2 Peter 1:20 - NO prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation.
This is off topic, so I’ll just point out that my decision to trust in Sola Scriptura is just as fallible as your decision to trust in the “infallible” magisterium.
40.png
evidence:
First, I apologize for using the 30K denominations number…I truly didn’t know it was a false number. However, whether its 20K, or 10K or 500 or 2, my point still holds…it is not what Jesus had in mind.
I accept your apology, and appreciate your attitude. Since this is not the topic of the thread, I will add no more to this here.
40.png
evidence:
Again you cite a council as having more authority than individual christians, even bishops…so there’s the council of jerusalem(acts 15), the council of florence, and the council of hippo, all declaring what the holy spirit wants…sounds like an authoritative church guided by the apostolic succession of bishops to me.
By the way, at what point after 400ad do you believe these councils had no more authority?
Again, this is not the topic of this thread.
 
I stand corrected on this. I was looking at one thing and responding to another (hey, I never claimed to be infallible!). Sorry for the confusion.
No problem. My question still stands. Where are they getting out of?
What are the wages of sin? How can a man pay these wages? If one is cast into prison (hell) until he has paid the last penny, how long will he have to be “locked up” before he has paid for even the smallest sin? Furthermore, since purgatory is supposed to be a place of temporal punishment (not a place to “pay for” one’s own sins), then how would this apply to purgatory?
You seem to be confused about the scripture passage and what purgatory is and is not. Hell is eternal punishment so, therefore, he cannot get out. There will be no payment made in Hell in order to get out of there. You are there forever and nothing will get you out of there. Not even God. Furthermore, purgatory is a place of temporal punishment for sins committed, so this passage very naturally does apply to purgatory, since this is a place where we can pay until the last penny. I think your “pay for” comes out of the myth that the Catholics can buy their way out of purgatory. Faulty thinking and proper investigation into the doctrine of purgatory would dispel your misunderstanding.
While it’s not the topic of this thread, I would say that the doctrine of the Trinity is obvious in the Scriptures, even though the word is not used.
Whilst purgatory is the topic of this thread, I think it obvious that the doctrine of purgatory is written in the pages of scripture.
I never said the works receive a reward, but those whose works are not burned up DO receive a reward. It is the one whose works are burned up that does not receive a reward. BTW – I never claimed to have the “final say on the issue”.
Actually, a careful reading of the passage suggests that those whose works are burned do, in fact, receive a reward (although they will also suffer loss). Their reward is their salvation. You see although they suffer loss, they are still saved. That is precisely what the passage says.

I still do not understand how you interpret this passage in light of the fact that those who suffer loss also are saved, after death. Please explain.
Your logic is faulty. If it’s useless for Jesus to preach to those in hell because they aren’t getting out, it’s just as useless to preach to those in heaven because they’re already there. Furthermore, it’s equally useless to preach to someone in purgatory because they’re going to go to heaven already. Of course, He could have preached to both the OT saints AND those in hell (Lazarus and the rich man shows that either side could see and communicate with the other). But are you suggesting that the OT saints were in purgatory?
Actually, your logic is faulty. I stand by what I said: no preaching in Hell (too late for them); no one in Heaven yet; very possible preaching going on in a third place, particularly when those there did not hear the Word. Please suggest to me where the OT saints were in your understanding.
I find other commentaries that put forth that Onesiphorus was not dead, but traveling and not at home when Paul wrote this. Since we know that he traveled to Rome, this seems to be a valid theory. However, just for argument sake, even if he was already dead (and based on the evidence presented, I concede it could be possible), I notice that Paul addressed the prayer to God (not any saint in heaven), and he didn’t ask for his release from purgatory (or ease of his punishment).
Paul does in fact ask for mercy from the Lord for Onesiphorus. Read v18. If he was in Heaven, then why would Paul be asking for mercy for him? Paul did not say purgatory - so what. It does not prove that Paul did not believe in it either. Paul wouldn’t have said purgatory because it is a Latin word. Not sure what the Greek equivalent is. Paul was an intelligent Jewish scholar who would have had no problem in a place of purification.

If Paul believed Onesiphorus to be as faithful as he suggests and believes what protestants believe today about salvation, then his suggestion to ask God for mercy for him after he died seems odd.
This is off topic, so I’ll just point out that my decision to trust in Sola Scriptura is just as fallible as your decision to trust in the “infallible” magisterium.
So why put your trust in something you believe to be fallible?
 
Dear Cachonga,

Whilst you say that reference to the canon of scripture is off topic, I think it plays a vital role in our understanding of the doctrine of purgatory. The canon which was first discussed at a council in the 4th century is the same canon that the CC has today. Jesus used the same OT canon (the septuagint) that the CC does today. That OT canon contains explicit details that prayers for the dead is a wholesome thing to do. Would Jesus use an OT that contained books contrary to His teaching?
 
I find it troubling to think that 99.98% of God’s creation is defective. I rather expect a better design from Him. My personal thought is that He should have a better than 50% success rate. On the other hand 1/3 of the angels failed the test. Humans are probably not going to do better. 30-50% loss would seem reasonable. [Strictly my :twocents:. I suspect He doesn’t care what I think reasonable. :D]

I recall from some apparition ]don’t remember which one or even if it is an approved one] Mary said that most go to Purgatory, many go to Hell, and a few straight to Heaven. That seems reasonable.
All men are defective except one man, Jesus Christ. All are deserving of hell according to the standards of God, which is what? Perfection! This is why it is all of grace and nothing more, on the basis of what? Faith! In who? Christ Jesus!

In His mercy and love toward man He chose to pull a remnant of humanity out of the deserved destination of hell. The real question is not one of purgatory, but whether you are part of that remnant.

I think we can all agree that God will not let anything with the stain of sin into Heaven. He did not dwell directly with the Israelites because of this stain and only allowed one man once a year to enter the Holy of Hollies. Upon the death of Jesus and He uttered the Words; it is finished, what was finished? All the work the Father had given Him, which was what? To redeem whosoever will call upon the Name of Jesus. Remember the Holy of Hollies was rent wide open upon His death; thus the official beginning of the New Covenant. Therefore, God now dwells in man and we, who truly believe, are a temple for God to dwell; therefore each person who is a true believer has to be cleansed on the inside before God will dwell there; this is why justification happens at the moment that one believes and then receives the Holy Spirit; if we did not have that perfect and stainless righteousness of Christ imputed to us, then there could not be any indwelling of God because we would have that stain of sin.

So for those that practice and teach that justification is part of sanctification ignores the very nature of God.

This is consistent, not only with Gods nature, but with all of Scripture concerning when we receive the Holy Spirit and are cleansed from all unrighteousness.

This should eleimante the notion of purgatory because we are thoroughly cleansed at the moment we are justified in His sight by the blood of Jesus the Christ.

And all of gods people say?
 
So for those that practice and teach that justification is part of sanctification ignores the very nature of God.
This is consistent, not only with Gods nature, but with all of Scripture concerning when we receive the Holy Spirit and are cleansed from all unrighteousness.
This should eleimante the notion of purgatory because we are thoroughly cleansed at the moment we are justified in His sight by the blood of Jesus the Christ.
Tanner
The Catholic Church teaches that there is an initial justification through Jesus Christ in baptism (John 3:5; Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38-39; Acts 22:16; Romans 6:3-6; 1 Cor 6:11; 1 Cor 10:1-2; Col 2:11-12; Titus 3:5; Heb 10:22; 1Peter 3:20-21; Matt 28:19). However, we are not completed in perfection yet.

John 14:21 - this verse indicates that we have to keep the commandments in order to show that we love Him.

Luke 1:6 - again, walking in all the commandments is a requirement.

Matt 24:13 - we must endure in order to be saved.

Matt 7:21 - a careful warning to all Christians.

Philippians 2:12-13 - Paul was certainly not assured of his initial justification being enough to gain entry into heaven. He knew he had to work in the grace of God.

James 2:24-26 - so Rahab was justified by her works not her faith alone.

1 Cor 10:12 - another warning that we should remain humble and call upon the grace of God to keep us from falling.

Rom 8:24-25 - if we are already saved in the protestant sense, then it is not hope but assurance. Paul clearly refutes this false doctrine.

1 Cor 9:27 - Paul is clearly not assured of his salvation and knows he is in desperate daily need of God’s grace in order to gain that final salvation that he hopes for.

1 Cor 13:4-13 - notice that the greatest of these virtues is love NOT faith. It is faith working in love not faith alone on a particular time in history that saves us.

1 Peter 3:20-21

The verses above indicate that salvation is a process. We are initially justified then through the grace of God he perfects us. It is not a case of either/or but it can be all of those things mentioned. Baptism, professing, enduring etc. that finally saves us. So when we look at verses like 1 Cor 3:14-15 purgatory makes perfect sense because as the passage tells us, we, through the work of Christ on the cross, are able to be cleansed of all impurities when we die - although salvation has still been obtained.

I find it interesting that many protestants insist that it is THEIR profession of belief in Christ that saves them. It seems to be a ‘salvation by works’ theology, because believing is a work of sorts. On the other hand, the Catholic Church teaches that is by God’s grace that we are saved. Even our works are a gift of grace given to us.

Perhaps Tanner, you could illuminate us with your interpretation of some of those verses, particularly the ones pertaining to purgatory that have been provided. I would be particularly interested in how you would interpret 1 Cor 3:14-15, because this seems to refute your understanding of us being totally cleansed permanently at the time of our justification. If we are made righteous, as you understand, then why do our works have to undergo a test and why do we have to suffer loss (after death)?
 
Tanner
The Catholic Church teaches that there is an initial justification through Jesus Christ in baptism (John 3:5; Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38-39; Acts 22:16; Romans 6:3-6; 1 Cor 6:11; 1 Cor 10:1-2; Col 2:11-12; Titus 3:5; Heb 10:22; 1Peter 3:20-21; Matt 28:19). However, we are not completed in perfection yet.

John 14:21 - this verse indicates that we have to keep the commandments in order to show that we love Him.

Luke 1:6 - again, walking in all the commandments is a requirement.

Matt 24:13 - we must endure in order to be saved.

Matt 7:21 - a careful warning to all Christians.

Philippians 2:12-13 - Paul was certainly not assured of his initial justification being enough to gain entry into heaven. He knew he had to work in the grace of God.

James 2:24-26 - so Rahab was justified by her works not her faith alone.

1 Cor 10:12 - another warning that we should remain humble and call upon the grace of God to keep us from falling.

Rom 8:24-25 - if we are already saved in the protestant sense, then it is not hope but assurance. Paul clearly refutes this false doctrine.

1 Cor 9:27 - Paul is clearly not assured of his salvation and knows he is in desperate daily need of God’s grace in order to gain that final salvation that he hopes for.

1 Cor 13:4-13 - notice that the greatest of these virtues is love NOT faith. It is faith working in love not faith alone on a particular time in history that saves us.

1 Peter 3:20-21

The verses above indicate that salvation is a process. We are initially justified then through the grace of God he perfects us. It is not a case of either/or but it can be all of those things mentioned. Baptism, professing, enduring etc. that finally saves us. So when we look at verses like 1 Cor 3:14-15 purgatory makes perfect sense because as the passage tells us, we, through the work of Christ on the cross, are able to be cleansed of all impurities when we die - although salvation has still been obtained.

I find it interesting that many protestants insist that it is THEIR profession of belief in Christ that saves them. It seems to be a ‘salvation by works’ theology, because believing is a work of sorts. On the other hand, the Catholic Church teaches that is by God’s grace that we are saved. Even our works are a gift of grace given to us.

Perhaps Tanner, you could illuminate us with your interpretation of some of those verses, particularly the ones pertaining to purgatory that have been provided. I would be particularly interested in how you would interpret 1 Cor 3:14-15, because this seems to refute your understanding of us being totally cleansed permanently at the time of our justification. If we are made righteous, as you understand, then why do our works have to undergo a test and why do we have to suffer loss (after death)?
Scripture interprets itself; but most people do not possess the Holy Spirit; but claim to know Christ. Part of the problem is they don’t bother to ask the proper question, which is “does Christ know me?” This takes a real heart examination of what the standard is and how to you measure up to that standard, then what to do about that deadly deficiency on Gods terms.

If you are interested in what God says I have already given you the most important part, which is God cannot dwell in a place of sin; therefore He cannot dwell in a person unless they have been cleansed by the blood of the Lamb. Justification is separate from sanctification in the sense that justification begins and ends at the moment a person truly believes and God knows the heart and cleanses it, then the sanctification process begins and lasts till the glorification at the death of the flesh.

Here is a definitive verse, right next to to the verse you asked me to address:
1 Corinthians 3:16-17 -
16 Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17 If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.

You do know what Holy means? The demons do.

Mark 1 -
23 Just then there was a man in their synagogue with an unclean spirit; and he cried out, 24 saying, “What business do we have with each other, Jesus of Nazareth? Have You come to destroy us? I know who You are–the Holy One of God!”
Hopefully you get the point and will consider this in your meditations on the Word; do not take what I say or think; do not take any person word, see for yourself via Scripture. If it is found to be true, then embrace it and be thankful; if not then reject it and be thankful.

To your question;
1 Corinthians 3:11-15 -
11 For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any man builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, 13 each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it because it is {to be} revealed with fire, and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. 14 If any man’s work which he has built on it remains, he will receive a reward. 15 If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.

Who is he speaking to? God’s children. What is the issue? Rewards based on works during the sanctification of the life of the child of God. If the works were done for God and not another motive, then you will receive a reward in addition to eternal life.
Where do you suspect these “rewards” are being given? Heaven or purgatory?

For more on what God says about Heavenly rewards see the following versus.
Matthew 5:12, 6:4, 6:6, 6:18, 10:40-42, Mark 9:41, Luke 6:23, 6:35, 1 Cor. 3:8, 9:17, 2 John 1:8,

Re 11:18 -
“And the nations were enraged, and Your wrath came, and the time {came} for the dead to be judged, and {the time} to reward Your bond-servants the prophets and the saints and those who fear Your name, the small and the great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”

Re 22:12 -
**"Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward {is} with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done. **
 
“…Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God…” (ebible.org/bible/kjv/) (accessed 4/ 29/ 09) (James, Ch. 2)

Above James, it seems to me, links Justification w/ Abraham offering Isaac to God.

Below, it seems to me, that Paul links Abraham’s Justification w/ believing God’s promise concerning Isaac.

“…And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb: 4:20 He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; 4:21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness…”

(ebible.org/bible/kjv/) (accessed 4/ 29/ 09) (Romans, Ch. 4)

Now perhaps we could start a new thread on Justification, but I believe this was relevant to your post Tanner. In your opinion when was Abraham Justified in the sense that you understand the word; in which passage above?
 
Scripture interprets itself; but most people do not possess the Holy Spirit; but claim to know Christ. Part of the problem is they don’t bother to ask the proper question, which is “does Christ know me?” This takes a real heart examination of what the standard is and how to you measure up to that standard, then what to do about that deadly deficiency on Gods terms.

“Scripture interprets itself”! Show me where in the bible that definitive statement is made. Acts 8:30-31 demonstrates this to be a false statement. 2 Peter 1:20 further demonstrates the error in your statement; and further 2 Peter 3:16 demonstrates that scripture is NOT self-interpreting. To add even further weight to the error of your statement, Matt 18:17-18 clearly tells us that we should listen to the church when there is disagreement among fellow believers.

Now as to your inference that perhaps I or the other Catholics do not possess the Holy Spirit and that is why our interpretation is false, then how do you answer to those fellow protestants that do not agree with your interpretation. It is the same old argument that I have never seen any protestant ably explain. I’m afraid you are just another of the many.

In terms of my own personal relationship, the questions are asked, the heart is examined and I still come up with the same interpretation - the Catholic one! But, of course, the Holy Spirit is missing. Explains it all doesn’t it.
If you are interested in what God says I have already given you the most important part, which is God cannot dwell in a place of sin; therefore He cannot dwell in a person unless they have been cleansed by the blood of the Lamb. Justification is separate from sanctification in the sense that justification begins and ends at the moment a person truly believes and God knows the heart and cleanses it, then the sanctification process begins and lasts till the glorification at the death of the flesh.
 
Here’s more proof…the jews and the early church father both believe in purgatory…
The Jews already believed it before the coming of the Messiah, as revealed in the Old Testament (2 Macc. 12:41–45) as well as in other pre-Christian Jewish works, such as one which records that Adam will be in mourning “until the day of dispensing punishment in the last years, when I will turn his sorrow into joy” (The Life of Adam and Eve 46–7). Orthodox Jews to this day believe in the final purification, and for eleven months after the death of a loved one, they pray a prayer called the Mourner’s Kaddish for their loved one’s purification. Jews, Catholics, and the Eastern Orthodox have always historically proclaimed the reality of the final purification. It was not until the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century that anyone denied this doctrine. As the quotes below from the early Church Fathers show, purgatory has been part of the Christian faith from the very beginning. Some imagine that the Catholic Church has an elaborate doctrine of purgatory worked out, but there are only three essential components of the doctrine: (1) that a purification after death exists, (2) that it involves some kind of pain, and (3) that the purification can be assisted by the prayers and offerings by the living to God. Other ideas, such that purgatory is a particular “place” in the afterlife or that it takes time to accomplish, are speculations rather than doctrines. * The Acts of Paul and Thecla “And after the exhibition, Tryphaena again received her [Thecla]. For her daughter Falconilla had died, and said to her in a dream: ‘Mother, you shall have this stranger Thecla in my place, in order that she may pray concerning me, and that I may be transferred to the place of the righteous’” (Acts of Paul and Thecla [A.D. 160]). * Abercius “The citizen of a prominent city, I erected this while I lived, that I might have a resting place for my body. Abercius is my name, a disciple of the chaste Shepherd who feeds his sheep on the mountains and in the fields, who has great eyes surveying everywhere, who taught me the faithful writings of life. Standing by, I, Abercius, ordered this to be inscribed: Truly, I was in my seventy-second year. May everyone who is in accord with this and who understands it pray for Abercius” (Epitaph of Abercius [A.D. 190]). * The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicity “[T]hat very night, this was shown to me in a vision: I [Perpetua] saw Dinocrates going out from a gloomy place, where also there were several others, and he was parched and very thirsty, with a filthy countenance and pallid color, and the wound on his face which he had when he died. This Dinocrates had been my brother after the flesh, seven years of age, who died miserably with disease. . . . For him I had made my prayer, and between him and me there was a large interval, so that neither of us could approach to the other . . . and * knew that my brother was in suffering. But I trusted that my prayer would bring help to his suffering; and I prayed for him every day until we passed over into the prison of the camp, for we were to fight in the camp-show. Then . . . I made my prayer for my brother day and night, groaning and weeping that he might be granted to me. Then, on the day on which we remained in fetters, this was shown to me: I saw that the place which I had formerly observed to be in gloom was now bright; and Dinocrates, with a clean body well clad, was finding refreshment. . . . [And] he went away from the water to play joyously, after the manner of children, and I awoke. Then I understood that he was translated from the place of punishment” (The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicity 2:3–4 [A.D. 202]). * Tertullian “We offer sacrifices for the dead on their birthday anniversaries [the date of death—birth into eternal life]” (The Crown 3:3 [A.D. 211]). “A woman, after the death of her husband . . . prays for his soul and asks that he may, while waiting, find rest; and that he may share in the first resurrection. And each year, on the anniversary of his death, she offers the sacrifice” (Monogamy 10:1–2 [A.D. 216]). * Cyprian of Carthage “The strength of the truly believing remains unshaken; and with those who fear and love God with their whole heart, their integrity continues steady and strong. For to adulterers even a time of repentance is granted by us, and peace * is given. Yet virginity is not therefore deficient in the Church, nor does the glorious design of continence languish through the sins of others. The Church, crowned with so many virgins, flourishes; and chastity and modesty preserve the tenor of their glory. Nor is the vigor of continence broken down because repentance and pardon are facilitated to the adulterer. It is one thing to stand for pardon, another thing to attain to glory; it is one thing, when cast into prison, not to go out thence until one has paid the uttermost farthing; another thing at once to receive the wages of faith and courage. It is one thing, tortured by long suffering for sins, to be cleansed and long purged by fire; another to have purged all sins by suffering. It is one thing, in fine, to be in suspense till the sentence of God at the day of judgment; another to be at once crowned by the Lord” (Letters 51[55]:20 [A.D. 253]).**
 
“…Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God…” (ebible.org/bible/kjv/) (accessed 4/ 29/ 09) (James, Ch. 2)

Above James, it seems to me, links Justification w/ Abraham offering Isaac to God.

Below, it seems to me, that Paul links Abraham’s Justification w/ believing God’s promise concerning Isaac.

“…And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb: 4:20 He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; 4:21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.…”

(ebible.org/bible/kjv/) (accessed 4/ 29/ 09) (Romans, Ch. 4)

Now perhaps we could start a new thread on Justification, but I believe this was relevant to your post Tanner. In your opinion when was Abraham Justified in the sense that you understand the word; in which passage above?
The highlighted area above on you response is the justification based on faith. Remeber this in studying James; God does not not need to SEE a works of any man for the man whom He justified He preordained and purposed the works He has every believer walk in; therefore who is object of the displayed works of the man of God? Is God? He already know the heart and prepared the works. Therefore it must be the outside world; the visible works are the fruits of righteousness that give testimony to the inward faith of the man of God. This is why James makes a definitive statement against those perople who say “I believe”, well the demons do to and shutter, so James says you say you believe and have nothing to show for it; I will prove my faith by my fruits as a testimony to the world for the glory of God. Therefore, James complements Ephesians 2 where Paul say no man is justified in His sight by works.

If you review Hebrews chapter 11 and count how many times “by faith” is used, then move over to the beginning of chapter 12; you wil see “such a cloud of witnesses” referring to all the heroes of the faith in chapter 11that believed God and persevered under much hostilities surrounding them.

If you want to start a thread on justification and works righteousness; i will be glad to add more insight from the Word of God, but like any peron, commentary, sermon or any other source of information; you must always test it against the Scripture to see if it is so; do not take my word for anything I just wrote above; test in in the refiners furnace, which is the Word.

God bless and I pray this helps answer your question and you will see if these things are true.
 
Again, 1 Cor 3:10-15 shows that our works are tried in the fire, not us.
Cachonga-

Two points to your lengthy post:
  1. You are correct to point out that sins may not be forgiven after death, and I will revise my document in which I stated otherwise. Purgatory deals with temporal punishment, but not with forgiveness. I regret that I mistated this.
  2. Robert Sungenis addressed this very passage in two lengthy rebuttals to arguments advanced by James White and they may be found here:
First Rebuttal
catholicintl.com/articles/OldArticles/01/First%20Rebuttal%20to%20James%20White%20on%20Purgatory.pdf

Second Rebuttal
catholicintl.com/epologetics/dialogs/lastthings/rebutal-white-purgatory1.htm
 
“Scripture interprets itself”! Show me where in the bible that definitive statement is made. Acts 8:30-31 demonstrates this to be a false statement. 2 Peter 1:20 further demonstrates the error in your statement; and further 2 Peter 3:16 demonstrates that scripture is NOT self-interpreting. To add even further weight to the error of your statement, Matt 18:17-18 clearly tells us that we should listen to the church when there is disagreement among fellow believers.
What do you suppose Philip answered; from the revelation of God? What is revelation from God? Scripture.
Now as to your inference that perhaps I or the other Catholics do not possess the Holy Spirit and that is why our interpretation is false, then how do you answer to those fellow protestants that do not agree with your interpretation. It is the same old argument that I have never seen any protestant ably explain. I’m afraid you are just another of the many.
I suspect no one can answer a question that is sufficient for you; because you demonstrated no desire to learn what God has actually said; rather you prefer to make God say, based on preconceived notion, that you are correct and everyone else is wrong; including God.
In terms of my own personal relationship, the questions are asked, the heart is examined and I still come up with the same interpretation - the Catholic one! But, of course, the Holy Spirit is missing. Explains it all doesn’t it.
On whose terms did you do that heart examination you speak of? Yours or Gods? It is a fact, if you do not have the indwelling the Spirit; one is, by default, a natural person and cannot know or understand the Word of God, but that doesn’t mean one cannot receive the Holy Spirit.
Perhaps you are the one not interested in what God actually says. The passage in 1 Corinthians tells us that the process of sanctification continues AFTER death.
So how does this “definitive” verse somehow negate the previous verses in which Paul tells us that we may still undergo purification AFTER death?
I addressed this in the post you responded to but you refuse to believe nor check to see if it is true. The fact that it is speaking of rewards based on the works of ones life; should give a clear indication to the least abled person that rewards will be given in Heaven.
The big question is, do you get the point. Do you get it that many have gone down the road you travel, breathing on one lung (i.e. bible alone) and cause the body of Christ to continue to split.
A man of Gods is united with Christ and is like-minded with his brothers and sisters in Christ.
You are a master of weaving and ducking when the hard questions are asked. Address the issue of suffering loss after death, although saved. Paul is not talking about a process undertaken whilst on earth, he is clearly speaking of a man’s work being tested after death. You are the second person on this thread that has avoided this verse. You know, the one that says “…you will suffer loss, although saved.” (paraphrased).
This is what I would label as a “little fruit Christian”; there is no such thing as a “no fruit Christian”.
The reward is heaven, of course, and this is precisely what Paul is telling us. We have received a reward but a purification takes place first in order that we may enter into God’s presence in a perfect condition.
The work is burned up to reveal the work wrought by God in the believer; whatever stands is what the reward is based on.

Sound like a broken record, I know:eek:

You have good questions but I think you need to open your heart and mind to receive the answers. Never take anyone’s word for anything. You know that if 2-3 witnesses agree on something; then it is deemed to be true. The same thing with the Word of God; if a minimum of 2 passages and preferably 3 prove or dispute, then you will have a good testimony and argument. But the passages must be in context of the topic to have validity and that will not be accomplished without the Truth Helper.

God bless you this Lords day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top