R
RyanL
Guest
To echo what Daniel Marsh is saying, please keep in mind that to be faithful to Christ we must not doubt His word. Question, sure, but doubt, never. To use the old saying, “a thousand questions does not a doubt make.”
As the CCC states:
[%between%](javascript
penWindow(‘cr/2088.htm’)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"
As you have seen, these “contradictions” are all answerable. The Church has survived 2000 years of people trying to tear her down (sometimes from inside), but no one has yet to be able to do so. There is a story that Napoleon Bonaparte once told a cardinal, “The Church is my enemy. I will destroy her.” The cardinal replied, “I don’t think you will. We cardinals have been trying to destroy her for centuries and haven’t been able to do it.” If the “pillar and bulwark of truth” (1 Tim 3:15) can withstand critics, heretics, atheists and persecuation for twenty centuries, she can withstand people pulling verses out of context, divorcing them from cultural understanding and common sense, and alleging “contradictions” in her sacred writings. Have no fear. If resolving these “difficulties” is all you are after, have faith and question on.
If, however, you are trying to resolve all of these difficulties so that someone you know will believe, I would start by preaching the Good News of Jesus Christ. If you just keep knocking down straw man arguments, they will keep erecting them. You will never finish. Start with substance. Start with Christ. You may have to start with the reasonableness of faith (arguments for the existence of God, arguments for the Bible as history, arguments for the existence of Christ, then arguments for the divinity of Christ based on the Bible as history) and proceed onward from there, but I wouldn’t get stuck arguing hermeneutics with someone who won’t believe once their “contradictions” are resolved because faith seems “unreasonable”.
You may be interested in Peter Kreeft’s Handbook of Christian Apologetics, which you can check out from your local library or buy at most any Barnes & Noble. It has excellent answers to hundreds of questions, the response you can expect, and the answer to the response. Kreeft is a Catholic, though the book is very ecumenical in its approach.
I hope this helps.
God Bless,
RyanL
As the CCC states:
[%between%](javascript
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :o :o"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"
[2088](javascriptpenWindow(‘cr/2088.htm’)
The first commandment requires us to nourish and protect our faith with prudence and vigilance, and to reject everything that is opposed to it. There are various ways of sinning against faith: Voluntary doubt about the faith disregards or refuses to hold as true what God has revealed and the Church proposes for belief. Involuntary doubt refers to hesitation in believing, difficulty in overcoming objections connected with the faith, or also anxiety aroused by its obscurity. If deliberately cultivated doubt can lead to spiritual blindness.
Questioning is fine, doubt is not. Believe based on the credibility of the Church and the objective reasonableness of faith until you find your answers.[2089](javascriptpenWindow(‘cr/2089.htm’)
*Incredulity *is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it. "*Heresy *is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same;
As you have seen, these “contradictions” are all answerable. The Church has survived 2000 years of people trying to tear her down (sometimes from inside), but no one has yet to be able to do so. There is a story that Napoleon Bonaparte once told a cardinal, “The Church is my enemy. I will destroy her.” The cardinal replied, “I don’t think you will. We cardinals have been trying to destroy her for centuries and haven’t been able to do it.” If the “pillar and bulwark of truth” (1 Tim 3:15) can withstand critics, heretics, atheists and persecuation for twenty centuries, she can withstand people pulling verses out of context, divorcing them from cultural understanding and common sense, and alleging “contradictions” in her sacred writings. Have no fear. If resolving these “difficulties” is all you are after, have faith and question on.
If, however, you are trying to resolve all of these difficulties so that someone you know will believe, I would start by preaching the Good News of Jesus Christ. If you just keep knocking down straw man arguments, they will keep erecting them. You will never finish. Start with substance. Start with Christ. You may have to start with the reasonableness of faith (arguments for the existence of God, arguments for the Bible as history, arguments for the existence of Christ, then arguments for the divinity of Christ based on the Bible as history) and proceed onward from there, but I wouldn’t get stuck arguing hermeneutics with someone who won’t believe once their “contradictions” are resolved because faith seems “unreasonable”.
You may be interested in Peter Kreeft’s Handbook of Christian Apologetics, which you can check out from your local library or buy at most any Barnes & Noble. It has excellent answers to hundreds of questions, the response you can expect, and the answer to the response. Kreeft is a Catholic, though the book is very ecumenical in its approach.
I hope this helps.
God Bless,
RyanL