T
trustinyou
Guest
Some denominations say you should not baptize your children until they are of age,or when they are old enough to decide on their own…Is there any biblical references to this??? I personally see none.
I think a lot of it comes from Matthew for starter… Look at Matthew 3:6,11 when John was talking to the crowds before Jesus started His main ministry (emphasis mine):Some denominations say you should not baptize your children until they are of age,or when they are old enough to decide on their own…Is there any biblical references to this??? I personally see none.
Verse 6 just says the people who were baptized there confessed their sins (it was also not a Christian Baptism, which didn’t begin until v. 16). And verse 11 says Baptism imparts the Holy Spirit.6Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River
11"I baptize you with[a] water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.
I never said it forbade it… I only offered some verses as to where the thought process comes from. Verse 11 may invoke the Holy Spirit but it specifically says that John was baptizing for REPENTANCE, then he tells of Christ who will come and baptize with the Holy Spirit. Water baptism is for repentance according to John.Verse 6 just says the people who were baptized there confessed their sins (it was also not a Christian Baptism, which didn’t begin until v. 16). And verse 11 says Baptism imparts the Holy Spirit.So I don’t see where children are forbidden as the OP asked.
If it wasn’t a Christian Baptism, then what was it?Verse 6 just says the people who were baptized there confessed their sins (it was also not a Christian Baptism, which didn’t begin until v. 16). And verse 11 says Baptism imparts the Holy Spirit.So I don’t see where children are forbidden as the OP asked.
Acts 2:38 said:Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins
andGo therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you
I don’t know of any that ever say it the other way around. You first repent or becomes a follower of Christ and THEN you get Baptized.He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned
Is this an infallible teaching? or is this just a “what I believe in”?I assume you really mean baptizing infants, not children (which is a separate issue).
The pastor at my previous church, when teaching on baptism, stated that although he did not consider infant baptism unscriptural, that he considered it not wise. This seems reasonable.
You are forgetting that the baptism that John the Baptist practised was NOT the Baptism that Jesus commanded the Apostles to give to people.I think a lot of it comes from Matthew for starter… Look at Matthew 3:6,11 when John was talking to the crowds before Jesus started His main ministry (emphasis mine):
6Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River
11"I baptize you with[a] water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.
Baptism is an act of obedience to God. It is for us to choose to seek and obey Him. We can’t make that decision for anyone else. How could an infant repent if (1) they have nothing to repent of and (2) they can’t know what repentance is?
Because God said it would be different!Now, if children were given the sign of the old covenant while they were only newborn, why should there be anything different about the sign of the new covenant?
Jeremiah 31:31-34
So right off it tells us the new covenant will NOT be the same as the one before it and that all people under it will know God and be forgiven.31 “The time is coming,” declares the LORD,
“when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.
32 **It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers **
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they broke my covenant, **
though I was a husband to a] them, (“http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah+31:31-34#fen-NIV-19724b”)] "
declares the LORD.
33 “This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time,” declares the LORD.
“I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
34 No longer will a man teach his neighbor,
or a man his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest,”
declares the LORD.
"For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more.”
John 1:11-13 (New International Version)
The first part refers to the old covenant, He came to those who were His own through that covenant, but they didn’t receive him, the second part is about the new Covenant that replaced it, God will allow people who believe in Him to be Born of him as His children.Code:11He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12**Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name**, **he gave the right to become children of God**— 13children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but **born of God.**
Can you link to that Justin?but the book of mormon has a hilarious one in the section titled moroni.
I’m not Justin but… scriptures.lds.org/moro/8Can you link to that Justin?
Thanks!
None of the pastors of any churches I have attended are incapable of being incorrect.Is this an infallible teaching? or is this just a “what I believe in”?