Biden repeats gaffe that he's running 'for the Senate,' appears to not remember Mitt Romney's name

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Forgetting Mitt Romney’s name is acceptable; normal people in their fifties start having failure in name recognition. But Biden’s forgetting he is running for President and saying he’s running for the Senate is another matter. As I’ve said before, I think he is simply not mentally fit to be President. Trump may be incoherent at times, somewhat crazy, and ethically challenged, but at least he is clear-minded. His politics are another problem (for me).

Fifteen-million-dollar minimum wage sounds pretty good, though. Socialist!
 
Last edited:
This thread quotes partisan media and in no way is a factual report. The headline is deceptive, also.
 
i agree. are we allowed to reply with a video of the many Trump gaffs?
 
As someone with a father with Alzheimer’s it really is disgusting his family is doing this to him.
 
Thanks. Luckily it’s very early still but the decline is visible. It’s pretty rough, he’s always been very independent so getting him to start going along with the program of being checked in on and following the doctors recommendations is… challenging to say the least. He doesn’t want to admit the danger he can pose to himself now.
 
Nepperhan . . .
This thread quotes partisan media and in no way is a factual report.
Click to expand...
To the readers here.

Nepperhan is wrong. The quotes are right on. And they are in appropriate context too.

Here is one quote from the OP calling Romney “the Mormon”.
Biden forgot who Mitt Romney was while getting off his plane, instead
calling him “the Mormon.”
Click to expand...
Bold mine.

Here again is the video of Biden forgetting Romney’s name, and calling Romney “the Mormon”.


.

Here is the other quote posted from my OP . . . .
Joe Biden: “I’m running as a proud Democrat for the Senate”
Click to expand...
Bold mine.

Here yet again is the video of Biden saying exactly this . . .


.

To the readers: Draw your own conclusions concerning Nepperhan’s criticism against my OP.

I stand by my OP.

.

Nepperhan . . .
The headline is deceptive, also.
Click to expand...
The headline was right-on.

Here it is again.
Joe Biden’s Probable Dementia Was on Full Display Today Forgets Romney’s name. Forgets what office he is running for … again
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I’m not going to go around and around on this. It state Biden’s ‘probable dementia’. That is just an allegation and is in no way proved. No reputable media outlet would have a headline like that.

Plus the thread title is even worse than the headline.
Deal with some issues. State some facts and opinions based on those.
 
Nepperhan . . .
It state Biden’s ‘probable dementia’ . . . No reputable media outlet would have a headline like that.
Click to expand...
Do you consider CNN reputable? (I don’t but if you do, I probably have diiferent reasons WHY I know CNN is not reputable).

Would you say MSNBC is “reputable” Nepperhan?

How about The UK Independent? USA Today?

Here is Newsweek on MSNBC from back in 2017 . . .

Trump In ‘Early Stages of Dementia,’ ‘Morning Joe’ Scarborough Claims​

BY JESSICA KWONG ON 11/30/17 AT 11:33 AM EST
Click to expand...
From The UK Independent about three years ago (August 2017) . . . .

Donald Trump may have early-onset dementia, says CNN commentator​

Comments come following President’s meandering, angry speech to supporters in Arizona​

Click to expand...
From a USA Today OpEd from over a year ago . . .

Trump’s cognitive deficits seem worse. We need to know if he has dementia: Psychologist​

Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
A lot of this could be solved for Catholics if the church would assert itself and guide its flock more carefully. Instead of side stepping and leaving it up to individuals, it would be helpful to have clear, straightforward directives. Candidate A’s stated policies are incompatible with church teaching, candidate B is not perfect but in an areas less grave, therefore a vote for either is not good, but B is less bad. Or even, Catholics should refrain from voting until such time as a viable candidate arises who is more compatible with our faith.
 
RhodesianSon said:
A lot of this could be solved for Catholics if the church would assert itself and guide its flock more carefully. Instead of side stepping and leaving it up to individuals, it would be helpful to have clear, straightforward directives.
Click to expand...
We have to vote on the recorder of deeds and the trustees of the water reclamation district in my county. You think the Church should take up a position as to these? What if court clerk (another elective position) favors same sex marriage. The clerk has nothing to do with marriages.

Should Catholic judges grant no fault divorces if that is the law?
 
Nepperhan said:
We have to vote on the recorder of deeds and the trustees of the water reclamation district in my county. You think the Church should take up a position as to these?
Click to expand...
Your parish priest should be able to help with local matters. But mainly I was speaking to national elections.
Nepperhan said:
Should Catholic judges grant no fault divorces if that is the law?
Click to expand...
No ideally they’d recuse themselves.
 
Nepperhan . . .
You think the Church should take up a position as to these?
Click to expand...
As Karl Keating has said.

You don’t vote for a pro-abortion politcian for dog catcher.

Also as Keating warns, you realize almost nobody gets their start in politics as a Senator, etc. They may BEGIN their political career as “dog catcher” so you don’t allow these guys to get a proverbial leg-up in politics.
 
puer.dei . . .
I don’t see why not. Covfefe on, dude.
Click to expand...
But dude. People ALREADY post Trump gaffes here on CAF.

Why not begin yet another thread on whatever Trump gaffe you want?

But my advice to those guys is,
don’t come here and poison this thread
that is not associated with “Trump”, with more anti-Trump items to clutter up this thread.

Covfefe on, dude.
 
Last edited:
RhodesianSon said:
No ideally they’d recuse themselves.
Click to expand...
The judge cannot recuse himself or herself if assigned to the domestic relations division – divorce is 40% of what they do. Also, judges have to be (in rotation), the ‘marrying judge’. Should a Catholic judge refuse to marry a couple?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top