C
ConstantineTG
Guest
No. Only Christ judges.If someone is excommunicated from the Catholic Church, does this mean that they are now condemned into hell unless they are restored to the Church?
No. Only Christ judges.If someone is excommunicated from the Catholic Church, does this mean that they are now condemned into hell unless they are restored to the Church?
By means of proper ordination. When Jesus commissioned the Apostles he said, “As the Father sent me so I send you”, He then layed on hands and breathed on them giving them the Holy Spirit. So - having received this authority from Jesus directly, they likewise directly pass on that authority in each ordination.The main question is does this power retain only in peter and no other person? If it is to be possessed by others, by what means?
Not sure what you mean here by “doddering”…We read later that the ‘‘church’’ has the power of the keys (binding/loosing abilities) which seems to be a wider structure than peter as an individual. Lets say this Church is referring to local bodies in each city. It is not a wild thought that Jesus taught Matthew 18 while doddering the spread of various churches in the world. If we grant this, then the power of the keys is in the hands of church clergy, bishops.
Well - Bishops (so far as I know) were never ordained by their congregations. They might be selected by the congregation but they would be ordained by another bishop.Since the first few centuries of the church consisted of many fellowships across the board of the world who had no contact with peters successors in Rome, how could they possess the power of the keys? And If in some cases, bishops were ordained by their congregations, how do they retain succession?
I suppose Protestants believe that, and for THEM, it may be true, for they have no lineage. But for Catholics, that will never happen, because we have the promise of Jesus to be with us always, and that the Church will never fail. It would make His words false, yes?So is it heretical to believe that someone is ordained through the holy spirit and the congregation?
What if there was a break in all of the ordinations from the twleve apostles.
It is important that we be careful in how we answer this. From the Catechism:So is it heretical to believe that someone is ordained through the holy spirit and the congregation?
Such what if’s have no point. It did not occur nor would God have allowed it to occur, so is not an issue.And if it is, what if there was a break in all of the ordinations from the twelve apostles. For instance, what if in the persecutions, a set of bishops were martyred and then there was no more bishops. The people who took their place, did they not ordain themselves through the holy spirit? Or the congregation?
‘What if… what if…’… what if there was a break in all of the ordinations from the twleve apostles.
For instance, what if in the persecutions, a set of bishops were martyred and then there was no more bishops.
There are a number of link in Catholic answers and even posts on CAF that can help you.The answers were very helpful. Only thing now to tackle is sorting and praying through the Marian doctrines. Does anyone know where one could see the historicity of this?
THIS might help get you started.The answers were very helpful. Only thing now to tackle is sorting and praying through the Marian doctrines. Does anyone know where one could see the historicity of this?
could you respond a bit on the issue of ordination in the protestant Church. This particular church was started by a seminarian (baptist) who planted the church back in 1995. Just two years ago, he was arrested for child molestation. Then the assistant pastor, who was ordained by the previous pastor (the one arrested) became the Senior Pastor and now ordained a new assistant Pastor.
**How would a Catholic argue or disprove the validity of this type of ordination?/**QUOTE]
The proper type of ordination…since the time of the Apostles…also requries the proper form and intent…it is of a sacramental nature…to confect the Eucharist. As you already know, the CC views the priesthood as a sacrament…and the sacraments are the channels of God’s grace.
My question is…what is the intent of this pastor getting laid hands for, or being ordained for?
Is it just some sort of ceremony to show a laying of hands…but not sacramental intent?
Here is the earliest account of laying of hands…in Numbers 27 (that I know of):
15 Moses said to the Lord, 16 “May the Lord, the God who gives breath to all living things, appoint someone over this community 17 to go out and come in before them, one who will lead them out and bring them in, so the Lord’s people will not be like sheep without a shepherd.”
18 So the Lord said to Moses, “Take Joshua son of Nun, a man in whom is the spirit of leadership,[a] and lay your hand on him. 19 Have him stand before Eleazar the priest and the entire assembly and commission him in their presence.
You can see from this passage…there is the involvement of the Eleazar…the Priest.
22 Moses did as the Lord commanded him. He took Joshua and had him stand before Eleazar the priest and the whole assembly. 23 Then he laid his hands on him and commissioned him, as the Lord instructed through Moses.
Now look at Paul’s in Acts 13…1 Now in the church at Antioch there were prophets and teachers: Barnabas, Simeon called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen (who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch) and Saul. 2 While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” 3 So after they had fasted and prayed, they placed their hands on them and sent them off.
One does not choose to be ordained…one is chosen and ordained.
So is it heretical to believe that someone is ordained through the holy spirit and the congregation?
The ordination is through the HS…and not the congregation. Look at the examples I posted previously…in Joshua, there was no congregation involved…and Paul’s in Acts 13.
And if it is, what if there was a break in all of the ordinations from the twleve apostles. For instance, what if in the persecutions, a set of bishops were martyred and then there was no more bishops. The people who took theiir place, did they not ordain themselves through the holy spirit? Or the congregation?
Let me give you a little anecdote…a true story. There is poster here who also was thinking of converting…and, just like you, his last hangup was Mary. I recommended this book below. Anyway, somehow, after a few days, he just suddenly stopped by a bookstore…a catholic one at that…he found himself looking at this book…and bought it. He recounted this in his later post…and after reading it…he said he understood better.The answers were very helpful. Only thing now to tackle is sorting and praying through the Marian doctrines. Does anyone know where one could see the historicity of this?
I did not understand it that way, but I will let him explain to you.I was responding to the previous post. It sounded like he was saying that the holy spirit ordains anyone even if they are disconnected from the catholic church.
But I appreciate your reccomdation!
Can you cite the post number…on the upper right…and the particular statement in the post?I was responding to the previous post. It sounded like he was saying that the holy spirit ordains anyone even if they are disconnected from the catholic church.
But I appreciate your reccomdation!
Hello everyone,
I was wondering what the Catholic Church has historically understood the passages dealing with the binding and loosing of sins.
If someone is excommunicated from the Catholic Church, does this mean that they are now condemned into hell unless they are restored to the Church?
In my case, I was excommunicated from my protestant church a couple of years ago, and I have tried to reconcile with them but they don’t believe I am really repentant, and so they have not restored me. I’ve tried a number of time, and perhaps I need more wisdom, but I think i’ve laid myself before them in repentance.
Does this mean that I am bound in my sin and guilt until the church remits me?
Now this protestant church believes that the binding/loosing function is merely declarative, it is not effectual. In other words, they do not believe in forgiving sins or binding men’s sin literally, but that they can no longer testify to that person’s salvation and so they are removed from the church.
In the case of my old protestant church, you may be thinking of the validity of their ordination. Well, they pastors there told me that the Holy Spirit chooses who is going to be in authority, and the with the people’s consent (congregations).