Birth control in less developed nations

  • Thread starter Thread starter St_Francis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All very interesting.
However it is sorely lacking as a rational (logical) defense of the claim that abc is moral.
A prime example of cognitive dissonance:

“Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time, or is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values” (Wikipedia)

One way of getting rid of cognitive dissonance is to ignore new incoming information.
 
It has been said here that the only practical answer to avoid having 18 children is birth control. That is false. The only practical and healthy answer is ecological breastfeeding. Among the Inuit Eskimos in Canada, families only had 3 to 4 children due to traditional nursing. It was only when they took up bottle-feeding obtained at the trading posts and shortened lactation that they begin having babies every year. God has a natural plan to space babies without abstinence and it all involves the maternal behaviors of the mother. To have menstruation return within 3 months after childbirth should be the rare exception if you take nature as the norm. To go one, two or even three years without menstruation is normal if the mother is following the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding. The Church needs to promote this form of natural family planning as it is God’s way. It is healthier for both mother and baby and the research shows the benefits last years after the breastfeeding has ceased.
Not many married women in the workforce then! Will teachers and nurses have to take their babies to work?
You would have to EXCLUSIVELY breast feed - not easy for a 3yr old…

Once your baby stops exclusively breastfeeding and suckling at the breast for comfort, breastfeeding becomes less effective as a method of contraception. So if you start combining breastfeeding with formula feeds or solid food, even if your periods still haven’t returned, you could be fertile.

Some women have lower levels of the hormone progesterone than others in the months after giving birth. If this is the case, you are more likely to become fertile earlier. The average for the return of periods in breastfeeding women is about 28 weeks after having a baby.

However, periods can return anywhere between 15 weeks and 48 weeks after you’ve had your baby. So it’s possible to be menstruating again about three-and-a-half months after you’ve had your baby, or as late as 11 months.

babycentre.co.uk/x543046/how-safe-is-breastfeeding-as-a-form-of-birth-control#ixzz3L3AEWJli
 

A prime example of cognitive dissonance:

“Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time, or is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values” (Wikipedia)

One way of getting rid of cognitive dissonance is to ignore new incoming information.
I did say I’d leave the subject…but I forgot the elephant in the room - AIDS.
In Africa AIDS has caused a huge, huge problem. We could go into the reasons it’s got so bad and play blame games but as Tony Blair is so fond of saying…we are where we are.
Cultural beliefs and/or practices have something to do with its getting so bad and they are often part of the reason it’s still a huge problem. Let’s not confuse countries…in the west, AIDS is generally no longer a death sentence. But in Africa it is. There are young orphans looking after their siblings and there are young children looking after their dying parents. Many of these children are infected themselves through birth. The young girls marry an infected widower etc etc. please use your imagination or just look it up on charity websites.

medwiser.org/hiv-aids/around-the-world/aids-in-africa/

You are NOT going to persuade African men and women to never have sex again - so many are infected or don’t know if they are or not, that this is, in effect, what you are suggesting to a large percentage of the population. Such is the hugeness of this epidemic…how can anyone know who is infected? Abstinence is a concept which is not easily understood in African cultures. An abstinence campaign will not stop AIDS. Safe sex education will protect innocent victims being infected…some before they are even born. If you take the view - better a soul created with AIDS than a soul not being conceived …well…words and understanding fail me.
Get a grip on this epidemic before you go in and try to change the culture that has made this problem. By all means encourage fidelity but don’t ignore reality.
From the luxury of a world without AIDS people can be free to make up their OWN minds about the morality of contraception.
 
I did say I’d leave the subject…but I forgot the elephant in the room - AIDS.
In Africa AIDS has caused a huge, huge problem. We could go into the reasons it’s got so bad and play blame games but as Tony Blair is so fond of saying…we are where we are.
Cultural beliefs and/or practices have something to do with its getting so bad and they are often part of the reason it’s still a huge problem. Let’s not confuse countries…in the west, AIDS is generally no longer a death sentence. But in Africa it is. There are young orphans looking after their siblings and there are young children looking after their dying parents. Many of these children are infected themselves through birth. The young girls marry an infected widower etc etc. please use your imagination or just look it up on charity websites.

medwiser.org/hiv-aids/around-the-world/aids-in-africa/

You are NOT going to persuade African men and women to never have sex again - so many are infected or don’t know if they are or not, that this is, in effect, what you are suggesting to a large percentage of the population. Such is the hugeness of this epidemic…how can anyone know who is infected? Abstinence is a concept which is not easily understood in African cultures. An abstinence campaign will not stop AIDS. Safe sex education will protect innocent victims being infected…some before they are even born. If you take the view - better a soul created with AIDS than a soul not being conceived …well…words and understanding fail me.
Get a grip on this epidemic before you go in and try to change the culture that has made this problem. By all means encourage fidelity but don’t ignore reality.
From the luxury of a world without AIDS people can be free to make up their OWN minds about the morality of contraception.
Another red herring.

How does taking a pill (abc) prevent AIDS?
 
It has been said here that the only practical answer to avoid having 18 children is birth control. That is false. The only practical and healthy answer is ecological breastfeeding. Among the Inuit Eskimos in Canada, families only had 3 to 4 children due to traditional nursing. It was only when they took up bottle-feeding obtained at the trading posts and shortened lactation that they begin having babies every year. God has a natural plan to space babies without abstinence and it all involves the maternal behaviors of the mother. To have menstruation return within 3 months after childbirth should be the rare exception if you take nature as the norm. To go one, two or even three years without menstruation is normal if the mother is following the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding. The Church needs to promote this form of natural family planning as it is God’s way. It is healthier for both mother and baby and the research shows the benefits last years after the breastfeeding has ceased.
This is, of course, how we evolved - like other mammals. Offspring stay close with their mother, continually feeding on demand until they are weaned. Primates carry their offspring all the time as they forage etc, they don’t put them down and go off anywhere - that would be too dangerous. Women in primitive society would have strapped their babies to them, where the baby had the continual comfort and food. Some societies still do that. In the society the extended family group would help out with any difficulties a new mother might have - the grandmother was probably still suckling a child and could wet-nurse for her daughter. Our society has moved on in many ways so that this constant demand of the child cannot be met by most women ( primitive societies still do it but don’t have much choice, but then again they may get a lot of satisfaction from it - not having the demands of a modern society).
Like I said, most women today just cannot or would not be prepared to spend their whole life as an ‘earth mother’ type, attached to a child pretty much the whole of their family rearing time - without a break! Personally I could not have physically done it when I had a baby who wanted tiny feeds pretty much every half hour. Painful doesn’t describe it.
Women also need other exercise for their brains and bodies other than being - let’s face it - a pretty obsessive mother. By the time a child can ask for breast milk, I think most people in today’s society would find that a bit obsessive and strange on the mother’s part. I also think that the average husband would get pretty fed up with ‘losing’ his wife for so long to a small child - mind AND body.
As for sleeping with the child - does anyone ask the poor father? I reckon THAT is the birth control part of this theory - only it IS a barrier method…the barrier being a small child constantly between a couple in the marital bed!!!
 
Do you know so little of what I know?
Your question suggested to me that you don’t know much about AIDS prevention and the use of condoms. If you do know about it then I assume you are just using a style of questioning to be provocative.
How effective are they? Aren’t these even more available than the pill?
The ABC method stands for “Abstinence, Be faithful, and Condom use”. It seeks to promote a different cultural view regarding safer sexual behavior, with an emphasis on fidelity, fewer sexual partners, and a later age of sexual debut. One successful example statistically demonstrates that the ABC method assisted in a 10% drop in the percentage of HIV cases in Uganda between the years 1990-2001. Thus, it seems that the foundation for an effective national response is a strong prevention program. For this to occur, there are necessary changes in the health sector, both cultural and monetary, which currently present huge challenges. Still, the global response to HIV/AIDS has recently seen a substantial improvement, as funding has come from many sources, largely the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the US initiative known as PEPFAR.

Religious factors
In Kenya, safe-sex commercials are banned. In addition, in 2009, the Pope Benedict, on a trip through Africa, banned the use of condoms in general. In 2013 the catholic church renewed banning of condoms in catholic schools. Muslim leaders have taken a similar stance in 2008. These are just a few examples demonstrating the significant pressure – and in some cases, condemnation – from both Christian and Muslim religious leaders in regard to AIDS and preventative-care education. Unfortunately, these stances have significantly impeded progress of a variety of safe-sex campaigns.

medwiser.org/hiv-aids/around-the-world/aids-in-africa/
 
Your question suggested to me that you don’t know much about AIDS prevention and the use of condoms. If you do know about it then I assume you are just using a style of questioning to be provocative.

The ABC method stands for “Abstinence, Be faithful, and Condom use”. It seeks to promote a different cultural view regarding safer sexual behavior, with an emphasis on fidelity, fewer sexual partners, and a later age of sexual debut. One successful example statistically demonstrates that the ABC method assisted in a 10% drop in the percentage of HIV cases in Uganda between the years 1990-2001. Thus, it seems that the foundation for an effective national response is a strong prevention program. For this to occur, there are necessary changes in the health sector, both cultural and monetary, which currently present huge challenges. Still, the global response to HIV/AIDS has recently seen a substantial improvement, as funding has come from many sources, largely the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the US initiative known as PEPFAR.

Religious factors
In Kenya, safe-sex commercials are banned. In addition, in 2009, the Pope Benedict, on a trip through Africa, banned the use of condoms in general. In 2013 the catholic church renewed banning of condoms in catholic schools. Muslim leaders have taken a similar stance in 2008. These are just a few examples demonstrating the significant pressure – and in some cases, condemnation – from both Christian and Muslim religious leaders in regard to AIDS and preventative-care education. Unfortunately, these stances have significantly impeded progress of a variety of safe-sex campaigns.

medwiser.org/hiv-aids/around-the-world/aids-in-africa/
When did this definition of abc arrive. On these fora, abc = artificial birth control. My comments were made with this in mind.

“safe sex” in another distracting phrase in the sex crazed society in which we live. It is one of many rationalizations use to justify sin.
 
When did this definition of abc arrive. On these fora, abc = artificial birth control. My comments were made with this in mind.

“safe sex” in another distracting phrase in the sex crazed society in which we live. It is one of many rationalizations use to justify sin.
I too took ABC to mean artificial birth control too, but abc is not limited to pills so when the discussion was on AIDs I knew Kelt was talking about condoms.

The term should be “safer sex” as no type of sex is 100% safe. Sex crazed or not ignorance of safer sex methods can be a killer.
 
When did this definition of abc arrive. On these fora, abc = artificial birth control. My comments were made with this in mind.

“safe sex” in another distracting phrase in the sex crazed society in which we live. It is one of many rationalizations use to justify sin.
Yes, we have all been taking abc to mean artificial birth control in these posts. We can all see the difference in the A BC on the posted website quote, as it is explained in the text.
As frobert points out, safe sex or safer sex, can be a matter of life and death - and not just one’s own death if a woman becomes pregnant.
You don’t seem to have a clear idea of the reality on the ground in Africa.
They don’t live in the ‘sex crazed society’ in which you live…they live in a society which is in so many ways different from yours. Read up on it - information is easy to get hold of these days. They still cling to cultural practices that we find horrifying. Aid agencies have been trying to better the lot of women in the third world for years. But remember - they cling to their beliefs as much as you do. You can’t wipe out centuries of cultural practice easily. And even the population who don’t share these beliefs and practices are being affected by AIDS as it is an EPIDEMIC ! Some countries cope worse than others.
If you look at the reality of the devastation wreaked by AIDS in Africa, you can see why the policy there is now ABC ( capitals to differentiate it from abc).
It’s all very well to grumble on about sin…how do you solve the problem? Like I said before, you ain’t going to stop the African population having sex…and that’s how AIDS is spreading right now.
It is far more of a sin to judge AIDS sufferers and their aid workers, from the comfort of our own armchairs without even having a clear understanding of the epidemic, thereby condemning FUTURE generations in Africa.
avert.org/children-and-hiv-aids.htm

This is interesting…I just looked it up…
Pope Paul VI issued the Humanae Vitae Encyclical Letter on the Regulation of Birth in 1968, which outlined opposition to “artificial birth control” on the basis that it would open a “wide and easy a road… towards conjugal infidelity and the general lowering of morality”.[5] The AIDS epidemic emerged from the 1980s. In 2010, Pope Benedict XVI characterized condom use as not a “real or moral solution” to the spread of AIDS, **but potentially a “first step” in the direction of moralization and responsibility, when used with “the intention of reducing the risk of infection”. **
(My emphasis).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top